In track and album titles there are instances of both , although No. 1
is much more popular,and this continues for most numbers. For example
there are 18,523 tracks using No. 1 and 3,293 using No.1, 18,426 using
No. 2 and 2,761 using No.2 , there are cases for most numbers below 100.
Also appli
Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Paul Taylor <mailto:ij...@fastmail.fm>> wrote:
>
> In track and album titles there are instances of both , although No. 1
> is much more popular,and this continues for most numbers. For example
> there
On 18/11/2011 17:54, Alex Mauer wrote:
Discussion on IRC[1] brought up the idea that perhaps it would be useful
to remove the possibility of setting track durations from releases which
don’t have clearly-defined track boundaries or durations (I believe this
is mostly analog releases, but there ma
On 23/11/2011 18:01, Alex Mauer wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 05:11 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
>>> The situation is:
>>> * phonograph records (in particular) have no clearly-defined duration
>>> (especially since the last groove locks and loops forever
>> We don't act
On 24/11/2011 17:55, Alex Mauer wrote:
On 11/24/2011 4:29 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
We don't actually add release times, just track times so I don't see
that this is that relevant,
It's relevant to the last track of each side, no?
Surely the point at which it reaches the last gr
On 25/11/2011 19:12, Alex Mauer wrote:
> On 11/25/2011 03:22 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
>> So, you seem to be saying don't store a time for the vinyl because if
>> you have a time for a cd release that is going to be better, that just
>> isn't true. Somebody may have put
On 10/12/2011 19:39, Alex Mauer wrote:
> On 12/10/2011 11:48 AM, lorenz pressler wrote:
>> Am 10.12.2011, 08:04 Uhr, schrieb Alex Mauer:
>>
how can i enter the time of a vinyl only release then?
>>> You’d enter it on the recordings associated with that release.
>> i can't see the benefit and l
On 12/12/2011 15:57, Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This discussion is a little off-topic here, but I can't think of a
> better group of active MB users to discuss a feature like this.
>
> I'd like MB to have some support for genres. This was apparently
> discussed at the last MB summit, but I don
On 29/10/2014 23:24, Ian McEwen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:55:53PM +, Tom Crocker wrote:
>> Out of interest, does this mean we're getting rid of the distinction
>> between official style guidelines and docs? Or are docs still open to
>> community editing?
> Any moving things into the c
On 30/10/2014 13:54, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Paul Taylor <mailto:ij...@fastmail.fm>> wrote:
I disagree, although one person is currently has now been put in
charge
of the style process this is a new change that may need twea
10 matches
Mail list logo
