hard defining what the difference is between a project and
a
group.
-Dustin (Kerensky97)
joan WHITTAKER wrote:
Given that it was Beth and I who originally put forward this idea, and
at
the moment Beth is ill and unable to be on mb, then I would be more than
willing to be champion
Given that it was Beth and I who originally put forward this idea, and at
the moment Beth is ill and unable to be on mb, then I would be more than
willing to be champion for this idea.
To reiterate my original reasoning:
Roger Glover is and has been for a long time a part of Deep Purple.
Discussion starts on the July mbstyle - first post by Beth, second from me:
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2006-July/003269.ht
ml
Joan
- Original Message -
From: Kerensky97 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 10,
: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 12:18 AM
Subject: Re: RFC: BonusDisc ammendment (was: Re: [mb-style] x (disc 1)
x(disc 2), vs x x (bonus disc) / version info for special releases)
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, joan WHITTAKER wrote:
Okay - this may be over simplistic. To my mind, the issue of a bonus
disc
That's two things we are in agreement on.
Initial capitalisation
and
I also hate Pink Floyd.
Joan
- Original Message -
From: Dave Smey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MusicBrainz style discussion musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 5:18 PM
Subject: Re:
As one of the original authors of this thread, I thought we had reached a
general consensus that the where a track began with an apostrophe, i.e.
'round, then it should be capitalised.
However, where it occurred in the middle of a track name, then it should be
lower case.
Am I over
Don
I do not at all think this is a problem that you are encountering alone,
neither do I think that you are being overly sensitive.
I really do think the problem is that quite a lot of people have time and
effort invested in this project. The larger it gets the more demands are
made upon
I would obviously like to say go for option 2, but in the interests of
fairness, then I think we ought to go to option 3.
Joan
- Original Message -
From: Robert Kaye [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MusicBrainz style discussion musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
Sent: Thursday, July 13,
You already know my opinion on this, but to
reiterate it, I definitely think that project should be added and as we have
already discussed this at some length, then it should be taken to the Request
for Veto stage.
Joan
- Original Message -
From:
Stefan
Kestenholz
To:
I also write to support Beth. A classic case in point is
http://musicbrainz.org/showalbum.html?albumid=504290
Roger Glover would in this context be the owner of the project and
participants would be Glenn Hughes, David Coverdale, Ronnie James Dio, Jimmy
Helms, John Gustafson, etc.
This is
should post it to the page Zout added. ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joan
WHITTAKER
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 7:19 AM
To: MusicBrainz style discussion; MusicBrainz style discussion
Subject: Re: [mb-style] Announcing style changes
I
]
To: MusicBrainz style discussion musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: [mb-style] Net Releases
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:36:41 +0200, Chris Bransden wrote:
On 18/06/06, joan WHITTAKER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do I take it that once Don Redman has spoken
I do not intend to get into this whole argument over meritocracy until I
have had a chance to read up on all the correspondence so far.
What I will say is that having brought a subject Net Releases to this
forum, I have become very frustrated indeed at the seeming inability of a
failure to
But in my very first post I specifically excluded iTunes, Napster and other
such from this debate, because most if not all of their titles are of albums
commercially available as CD's and I wanted this debate to concentrate on
those which were purely net releases.
Joan
- Original Message
Excuse me for being somewhat obtuse, but does this then mean that if an
album, track or whatever is put out on the INTERNET, then at that time it
becomes to all intents and purposes a worldwide release
- Original Message -
From: Don Redman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MusicBrainz style
Surely the fact that all users cannot access the
http://www.mastik.org/?page=releases site is not the fault of Mastik. They
had an expectation when they uploaded their music that it would be
available. The fact that it is not is surely more to do with the ISP
providing the service to the
Of joan
WHITTAKER
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 12:38 PM
To: MusicBrainz style discussion
Subject: Re: [mb-style] Net Releases
Surely the fact that all users cannot access the
http://www.mastik.org/?page=releases site is not the fault of Mastik.
They
had an expectation when they uploaded their music
discussion musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: [mb-style] Net Releases
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:13:31 +0200, joan WHITTAKER wrote:
Excuse me for being somewhat obtuse, but does this then mean that if an
album, track or whatever is put out
and couldn't put it on my psp.. I never liked it much anyways, but, I
certainly have a problem with it now. If Klayton didn't release songs
through there I'd never touch it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joan
WHITTAKER
Sent: Sunday, June
/18/06, Schika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/18/06, joan WHITTAKER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excuse me having to ask, but how do we now get this put into the
guidelines?
OK our Country field is for the distribution area. This is very clear
for internet releases or releases are known
]
To: MusicBrainz style discussion musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: [mb-style] Net Releases
On 6/19/06, joan WHITTAKER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pardon me asking, but what have a bunch of vinyls got to do with net
releases.
Aren't we
I totally agree with Nikki. The perception of most people is that if it is
available on the internet, then it is available worldwide.
This is exactly the reason why I brought this up. We have many rules, and
that is exactly as it should be if we are to keep a database that is
reasonably
First of all let me make it clear that I am not talking about music released
through iTunes, Napster or similar, which invariably are commercial
releases, available in most retail stores, being released on the net.
What I would like to get a consensus of opinion on is those releases which
The problem here is to define what you mean when you say grouping single
artist. This thread started because objection was made to the inclusion of
Tyrannosaurus Rex (who issued four albums under that name, and whose
re-issues have all been under that name) and T Rex, who evolved out of the
24 matches
Mail list logo
