Hi,
While Kuno and I were talking about the special purpose track titles, we
ended up completely disagreeing about when the same recordings should be
used.
My opinion on [silence] is that 2 seconds of silence is 2 seconds of
silence so it would be the same recording regardless of the artist or
Don't all silent tracks on a release have an artistic purpose? Otherwise I
don't think they would be on the release. I'd keep them separate.
-- Inviato dal mio cellulare Android con K-9 Mail.
Nikki ha scritto:
Hi, While Kuno and I were talking about the special purpose track titles, we
ended u
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Maurits Meulenbelt
wrote:
> Don't all silent tracks on a release have an artistic purpose? Otherwise I
> don't think they would be on the release. I'd keep them separate.
> -- Inviato dal mio cellulare Android con K-9 Mail.
Not all of them. We have the [silence] t
2011/3/23 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren :
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Maurits Meulenbelt
> wrote:
>> Don't all silent tracks on a release have an artistic purpose? Otherwise I
>> don't think they would be on the release. I'd keep them separate.
>> -- Inviato dal mio cellulare Android con K-9 Ma
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:29, Maurits Meulenbelt
wrote:
> Don't all silent tracks on a release have an artistic purpose? Otherwise I
> don't think they would be on the release. I'd keep them separate.
Following the guidelines technically, all “[silent]” tracks should be
recordings of the same wo
Bogdan Butnaru wrote:
> That said, this does seem silly, and I’m not sure I see the point.
Yes, it does seem rather silly.
Speaking of silly... The only [silence] track in the database at the
moment which has any relationships is
http://musicbrainz.org/track/3ee3c8f1-107e-4c05-94cd-cfe7c4b60b59
Jan van Thiel (MusicBrainz) wrote:
> 2011/3/23 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren :
>> Not all of them. We have the [silence] tracks that are just there to
>> separate "normal" tracks and "bonus" tracks, and that are just
>> 2-second long computer silence. Those are the ones I'd consider
>> merging as one r
This one for example:
http://musicbrainz.org/track/eb10bbd8-4078-474c-bb15-0004a9bc1018.html
2011/3/27 Nikki
> Jan van Thiel (MusicBrainz) wrote:
> > 2011/3/23 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren :
> >> Not all of them. We have the [silence] tracks that are just there to
> >> separate "normal" tracks and
Maurits Meulenbelt wrote:
> This one for example:
> http://musicbrainz.org/track/eb10bbd8-4078-474c-bb15-0004a9bc1018.html
That one's not called [silence]. I'm only asking about [silence], not
tracks with an actual name (I said something like that in my first email
too).
Nikki
