On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:24:38PM -0800, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
> I also like the Gecks suggestion in
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ConsistentOriginalData . I made a couple of
> minor suggestions there.
Yes, I like Gecks rewrite of COD. I'd prefer to have that implemented
over the split up I sugge
Kuno Woudt-2 wrote:
>
> So, I propose to split [ConsistentOriginalData] into two new pages, and
> throw away
> the current name to avoid any further confusion.
>
Support.
Kuno Woudt-2 wrote:
>
> The two new pages would be:
>
>
> ConsistentOfficialData
>
> "If, something is consistently
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:56:25PM +, Chris B wrote:
> rename ConsistantOriginalData to ConsistantOfficialData makes sense to
> me, but otherwise i don't see what the conflict is between what the
> StylePrinciple says and ConsistantOfficialData says (other than the
> fact the former is slightl
On 25/02/2008, Kuno Woudt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:44:39PM +, Chris B wrote:
> > On 25/02/2008, Kuno Woudt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > i disagree with the use of 'style' here.
>
>
> Please then discuss that in a seperate RFC. This definition has
> existed
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 05:02:35PM -0500, Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> > They would both be at point #3 of the StylePrinciple, if you
> > think one of these shouldn't trump regular guidelines, etc..
> > please also discuss that seperately and not as part of this
> > RFC.
> >
> > -- kuno / warp.
>
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:44:39PM +, Chris B wrote:
> On 25/02/2008, Kuno Woudt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i disagree with the use of 'style' here.
Please then discuss that in a seperate RFC. This definition has
existed in this form since atleast 2005. I am merely giving it
a less confus
> The two new pages would be:
>
>
> ConsistentOfficialData
>
>
> ConsistentData
>
>
> They would both be at point #3 of the StylePrinciple, if you
> think one of these shouldn't trump regular guidelines, etc..
> please also discuss that seperately and not as part of this
> RFC.
>
> -- kun
On 25/02/2008, Kuno Woudt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> As some of you will know, I am getting a bit annoyed with
> ConsistentOriginalData having two different meanings, which in
> certain situations even contradict eachother.
>
> So, I propose to split it up into two new pages, an
(for those interested, i've opened #3601 on the bugtracker to track this issue)
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Kuno Woudt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> As some of you will know, I am getting a bit annoyed with
> ConsistentOriginalData having two different meanings, which in
> certain situations even contradict eachother.
>
> So, I propose to split it up int
Hello!
As some of you will know, I am getting a bit annoyed with
ConsistentOriginalData having two different meanings, which in
certain situations even contradict eachother.
So, I propose to split it up into two new pages, and throw away
the current name to avoid any further confusion.
The two
11 matches
Mail list logo
