This RFC is to add a "live" attribute to the recording<->work "performance of"
relationship. It should expire on June 15.
There is a current revision at:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Bitmap/Performed_Relationship_Type_Live_Attribute
As you can see, the attribute "indicates that the recording
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Michael Wiencek wrote:
> This RFC is to add a "live" attribute to the recording<->work "performance of"
> relationship. It should expire on June 15.
>
> There is a current revision at:
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Bitmap/Performed_Relationship_Type_Live_Attrib
2011/6/8, Michael Wiencek :
> This RFC is to add a "live" attribute to the recording<->work "performance
> of"
> relationship. It should expire on June 15.
>
> There is a current revision at:
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Bitmap/Performed_Relationship_Type_Live_Attribute
>
> As you can see, th
+1 here as well, would be great to differentiate pre-recorded
recording and live recordings (at least for POP, Jazz, Rock, etc...)
With classical, Opera, well, it's almost always Live, but I'm sure
there's exceptions
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria
wrote:
> 2011/6/8, Michael
On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
> 2011/6/8, Michael Wiencek :
>> This RFC is to add a "live" attribute to the recording<->work "performance
>> of"
>> relationship. It should expire on June 15.
>>
>> There is a current revision at:
>> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Bitmap
On 06/08/2011 11:15 AM, Michael Wiencek wrote:
> This RFC is to add a "live" attribute to the recording<->work "performance of"
> relationship. It should expire on June 15.
Why a separate attribute rather than just storing it (along with the
date if available, similar to Live Bootleg Style) in the
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Alex Mauer wrote:
> On 06/08/2011 11:15 AM, Michael Wiencek wrote:
>> This RFC is to add a "live" attribute to the recording<->work "performance
>> of"
>> relationship. It should expire on June 15.
>
> Why a separate attribute rather than just storing it (along wit
On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Alex Mauer wrote:
> On 06/08/2011 11:15 AM, Michael Wiencek wrote:
>> This RFC is to add a "live" attribute to the recording<->work "performance
>> of"
>> relationship. It should expire on June 15.
>
> Why a separate attribute rather than just storing it (along with
On 06/08/2011 12:09 PM, Michael Wiencek wrote:
> When a work has a hundred different recordings, it makes it much easier to
> view and manage the list because they are sorted and grouped by the link
> phrase.
Interesting, I think it makes it more difficult because you have to look
in several diffe
On Jun 8, 2011, at 12:35 PM, Alex Mauer wrote:
> On 06/08/2011 12:09 PM, Michael Wiencek wrote:
>> When a work has a hundred different recordings, it makes it much easier to
>> view and manage the list because they are sorted and grouped by the link
>> phrase.
>
> Interesting, I think it makes it
It's been more than a week, you can send an RFV now.
Nikki
Michael Wiencek wrote:
> This RFC is to add a "live" attribute to the recording<->work "performance of"
> relationship. It should expire on June 15.
>
> There is a current revision at:
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Bitmap/Performed_
11 matches
Mail list logo