Re: [mb-style] Separate works for instrumental version?

2011-05-24 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 20:45, Nikki wrote: > Philip Jägenstedt wrote: >> That sounds pretty good, but it wouldn't really be accurate for >> karaoke tracks where the background singers are usually left in and >> only the lead singer is left out. Perhaps a karaoke attribute would >> work, but I'm n

Re: [mb-style] Separate works for instrumental version?

2011-05-22 Thread caller#6
On 05/22/2011 11:45 AM, Calvin Walton wrote: > On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 16:41 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: >> How should we handle recordings that differ from the original only in >> that some or all of the vocals have been removed? This would be the >> case for both instrumental versions and for k

Re: [mb-style] Separate works for instrumental version?

2011-05-22 Thread Nikki
Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > That sounds pretty good, but it wouldn't really be accurate for > karaoke tracks where the background singers are usually left in and > only the lead singer is left out. Perhaps a karaoke attribute would > work, but I'm not sure if it's going to be possible to draw a line

Re: [mb-style] Separate works for instrumental version?

2011-05-22 Thread Calvin Walton
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 16:41 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > How should we handle recordings that differ from the original only in > that some or all of the vocals have been removed? This would be the > case for both instrumental versions and for karaoke tracks. > > It seems rather silly to have

Re: [mb-style] Separate works for instrumental version?

2011-05-22 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 18:37, Aurélien Mino wrote: > On 05/22/2011 04:41 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: >> It seems rather silly to have separate works, but it also seems silly >> that the instrumental versions should get a lyricist relationship if >> they are linked to the single work. Ideas? >> >

Re: [mb-style] Separate works for instrumental version?

2011-05-22 Thread Aurélien Mino
On 05/22/2011 04:41 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > It seems rather silly to have separate works, but it also seems silly > that the instrumental versions should get a lyricist relationship if > they are linked to the single work. Ideas? > What about an "instrumental" attribute to the performance AR

[mb-style] Separate works for instrumental version?

2011-05-22 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
How should we handle recordings that differ from the original only in that some or all of the vocals have been removed? This would be the case for both instrumental versions and for karaoke tracks. It seems rather silly to have separate works, but it also seems silly that the instrumental versions