On Tuesday 25 April 2006 15:55, Don Redman wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:55:57 +0200, derGraph wrote:
I guess we're back on the RFC phase, then?
I have not followed the whole thread, but I guess not.
Noone has issued a veto and that is what counts. This is the whole point
of the RFV
It seems like my post got lost somewhere, so I send it again. Please
excuse if it arrives twice.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Satire vs. Parody ... Re: [mb-style] new relationship
type parody
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:28:34 +0200
From: derGraph [EMAIL
On Monday 24 April 2006 11:02, derGraph wrote:
Again: Veto?
derGraph
I'm not saying this is actually going to be an issue, but felt it should be
brought up before this is actually implemented in case it might cause issues
later.
That is the difference between satire and parody. Many of the
Joe wrote:
That is the difference between satire and parody. [...]
The difference can be the difference between fair use and a lawsuit,
apparently (referring to U.S. copyright laws, at least).[...]
This is not a veto, and if it's chosen to just use parody rather than
separate parody and
