On Tuesday 25 April 2006 15:55, Don Redman wrote: > On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:55:57 +0200, derGraph wrote: > > I guess we're back on the RFC phase, then? > > I have not followed the whole thread, but I guess not. > > Noone has issued a veto and that is what counts. This is the whole point > of the RFV mechanism, the simple fact that someone has another grain of > salt to add should not stop the process.
My only intention was to make it known. If anyone else thinks it's a problem, they can veto. I'm not saying it will be a problem, but mentioning it in case someone who's more familiar with past AR situations might see a problem with it. Better they see it now than 6 months after it's in use or so. If nobody sees this as being an issue that will cause us problems down the road, then it can just be ignored. -HairMetalAddict _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
