Re: [Musicpd-dev-team] server to server connection

2009-10-25 Thread Stefan Monnier
That's the point though. Why introduce this complexity when it's unnecessary? Let's state a much simpler way without complicating how things currently work. I agree that the underlying functionality is already provided in enough ways. But maybe MPD could provide a bit of help here and there

Re: [Musicpd-dev-team] server to server connection

2009-10-25 Thread Avuton Olrich
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote: That's the point though. Why introduce this complexity when it's unnecessary? Let's state a much simpler way without complicating how things currently work. I agree that the underlying functionality is already

Re: [Musicpd-dev-team] server to server connection

2009-10-25 Thread Avuton Olrich
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Steffen 'stefreak' Neubauer stefr...@stefreak.de wrote: On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:12:17 -0700 Avuton Olrich avu...@gmail.com wrote: Point is MPD can /easily/ do what you're looking for without reworking a wheel. No that's not true. You can _not_ do it easily,

Re: [Musicpd-dev-team] server to server connection

2009-10-25 Thread Metyl Methylius
Hi *, I have the same problem about mpd. I need a transparent access to my setuped instance of mpd anywhere on the network (i like to listen music from my collection from work. No decoding and encoding only transparent data transfer. Only then the quality of the record stays same as was in the

Re: [Musicpd-dev-team] server to server connection

2009-10-25 Thread Avuton Olrich
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Metyl Methylius the.me...@gmail.com wrote: Hi *, I have the same problem about mpd. I need a transparent access to my setuped instance of mpd anywhere on the network (i like to listen music from my collection from work. No decoding and encoding only