On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 18:20:57 -0500, Rob Reid wrote:
> Thanks, Byrial, for fixing the my_hdr Subject: problem.
>
> At 2:55 AM EST on March 12 Byrial Jensen sent off:
> > BTW someone told me that all 3 things aren't bugs, but intentional
> > (and undodumented!) features. It may be so, but then
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Petr Hlustik wrote:
> Peter van Dijk wrote:
>
> >
> > Sure you can, just put all folders in a 'mailboxes' line in your .muttrc
>
> I have used the following entries to emulate Pine defaults (I have
> occasionally switched back and forth for a while):
>
> # Make the m
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 10:53:14PM +1100, Russ Pitman wrote:
> Ok as above, now could let me know what has to be done to get mutt to see
> my mail. mutt looks in /var/spool/mail/rjpp which is always empty.
> I use procmail to stash the incoming in ~/mail/INBOX,etc,etc,etc.
> Would m
> BTW, doesn't Majordomo generate X-Mailing-List: entries in the
> header? I use procmail to copy everything from coming from a
> mailing list to the appropriate +inbox.. However
> Majordomo does _not generate_ it and i haven't found another
> criteria to detect mutt-user mails.
TO_ works pr
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 01:23:56PM +0100, Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 10:53:14PM +1100, Russ Pitman wrote:
>
> > Ok as above, now could let me know what has to be done to get mutt to see
> > my mail. mutt looks in /var/spool/mail/rjpp which is always empty.
> > I us
Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mutt always asks me if I want my read mail to be moved to mbox.
> I find that rather anoying and don't want that.
>
> Is there a way to make Mutt stop me asking?
> I either keep my mail in my spool dir - or move to folders - bui I never
> use mbox...
The m
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 02:12:58PM +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> > BTW, doesn't Majordomo generate X-Mailing-List: entries in the
> > header? I use procmail to copy everything from coming from a
> > mailing list to the appropriate +inbox.. However
> > Majordomo does _not generate_ it and i have
never heard any response from this, so I'm re-asking
tw
On 03/09/1999 09:10 -0600, Tim Walberg wrote:
>> Just a little nit. When sending a message via command line (at least in
>> mailx emulation mode - I ought to try without that flag), my PGP se
This is actually a really lame default. We discussed this a long time
ago, and everyone, including Michael Elkins, agreed that the default
should be no. Why has it changed back? We should change it back to
"no" in 0.96.x, because it makes mutt more usable out of the box.
-Daniel
On Mon, Mar 1
On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 06:27:07PM +, Andreas wrote:
> Hi Ron Johnson,
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, you wrote:
>
> > The move configuration variable in your .muttrc controls moving read
> > messages from your spool to your mbox. It is a quadoption, so you
> > should be able to just set it from the a
You should add:
set move=no
to your .muttrc. Check out:
http://www.mutt.org/manual-6.html#ss6.3
for more details.
Cheers,
Ron
Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Ron Johnson,
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, you wrote:
>
> > The move configuration variable in your .muttrc controls moving read
>
Hi,
I'm getting this error mesg from time to time:
imap_error(): unexpected response in imap_check_mailbox(): * BYE Autologout; i
Specifically, I get this when I haven't touched index for a while. That
means, I'm either in pager reading mails or composing mail. Then when I
go back to index, i go
Someone kindly replied direct suggesting using
mutt -f ~/mail/INBOX as a test. That worked,however while trying to get a
mailboxes entry to work,switching from editor to mutt each time in another
tty, pine got the stitch and deleted all in my INBOX file!
So I lost your address. W
Try:
set reply_regexp="^((re:|\\[mylist\\])[ \t]*)+"
This will of course lose you the advantage of the sort_re variable,
since in terms of pseudo-threading, mutt will think everything is a
reply. This might make messages that have the same subject but are
actually not really in the same thread g
On 03/15/99 Nathan Treadway uttered the following other thing:
> First off, I've tried to look for this answer in the mailing list
> archives but have found that www.findmail.com (following the link from
> http://www.mutt.org/) hasn't been responding for a couple of days.
> If someone can point
First off, I've tried to look for this answer in the mailing list
archives but have found that www.findmail.com (following the link from
http://www.mutt.org/) hasn't been responding for a couple of days.
If someone can point me to another archive site that I could search I'd
be happy to do that.
Nathan Treadway wrote:
> Has anyone else solved this problem?
My reply_regexp is
^((\[[-[:alnum:]_:/]+\]|([A-Z]|[0-9][A-Z])[-[:alnum:]_:/]+:)[
\t]*)*(re|aw|wg|be|Re|Aw|Wg|Be|RE|AW|WG|BE):[ \t]*
which seem to work on lists which have subjects like "Re: [listname]
subject", but I haven't tested
17 matches
Mail list logo
