Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 09:22:09PM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 02:36:30PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> > I don't like to wait for a second there. Since I'm also a subscription
> > moderator, I get 5-6 of these mails a day and growing..
>
> You obviously need a slow
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=NBQMqqtZQBFxm+aD; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=UK1lfQXsnwKrySH9; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 02:36:30PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> I don't like to wait for a second there. Since I'm also a subscription
> moderator, I get 5-6 of these mails a day and growing..
You obviously need a slower computer. On my box starting and quitting my
editor takes longer so I neve
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> lbdb will never be incorporated into Mutt, because it is a separate
> package which can be used by Mutt using a clear interface. So it
> shouldn't be a problem to combine Mutt and lbdb. For new versions of
> lbdb see http://www.spinnaker.de/debian/#l
Hello Mutts,
I noticed that if one's current dir does not exist (ie. remove an interactive
shell's CWD in another shell), mutt will only open the user's mailbox(es)
read-only -- regardless of the directory in question. Why would this be the
case if '.' is not a meaningful dir to mutt?
To be tho
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999, Roland Rosenfeld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
|
| The compressed folders patch is a bigger problem. The patch works but
| it isn't checked against all possible problems. Additionally it is not
| programmed very clean. So Thomas seems to be waiting for someone
| cleaning up the s
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 04:27:37AM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote
> sources. I didn't hear that someone except me is using this patch, so
> I fear that nobody needs it and wants it. But maybe this only means
I am using it, and it works fine for me and others here.
I wrote a mail to mutt-user
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 12:06:55PM +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 10:04:17 +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> > When replying to a message, after entering vi, when doing :wq within 1 second (or
> > actually in the same second, I think) mutt thinks it should abort because the
>m
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 10:57:54AM +0200, Stefan Leupers wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 10:04:17AM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>
> > When replying to a message, after entering vi, when doing :wq within
> > 1 second (or actually in the same second, I think) mutt thinks it
> > should abort becau
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=FCuugMFkClbJLl1L; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Renaud Colinet wrote:
> the 'a' key makes it possible to create an alias based on the From
> header. Is there any way for mutt to take addresses from a group
> message (i.e. including the To and Cc fields, and if possible
> removing my own address) to create a list alias, rat
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 10:04:17 +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> When replying to a message, after entering vi, when doing :wq within 1 second (or
> actually in the same second, I think) mutt thinks it should abort because the message
> is unmodified.
I have a patch called patch-0.95.3.bj.ed_mtime
the 'a' key makes it possible to create an alias based on the From header. Is
there any way for mutt to take addresses from a group message (i.e. including
the To and Cc fields, and if possible removing my own address) to create a
list alias, rather than picking all addresses manually?
TIA
--
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 04:27:37AM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> I didn't hear that someone except me is using this patch, so
> I fear that nobody needs it and wants it. But maybe this only means
I know at least 3 persons (includes me) who use this patch.
It's VERY usefull under Solaris,
When replying to a message, after entering vi, when doing :wq within 1 second (or
actually in the same second, I think) mutt thinks it should abort because the message
is unmodified.
Greetz, Peter.
--
.| Peter van Dijk | stoned worden of coden
.| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | dat is de levens
On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, Christian R Molls wrote:
> Are there plans to incorporate the
>
> - compressed folders patch
> - lbdb
>
> into mutt? I guess quite a number of people will miss those two
> enhancements, and that is, at least IMO, a shame.
lbdb will never be incorporated into Mutt, because
21 matches
Mail list logo
