Re: secure tunnel and IMAP

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
On Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 11:11:19PM -0400, Adam Lazur wrote: > I've looked at still attempting to move my email over to imap, and am > a little weary of sending my password over the internet in > plaintext. Is there a method currently available in mutt to setup a > secure tunnel (via ssh) to the im

secure tunnel and IMAP

1999-06-24 Thread Adam Lazur
I've looked at still attempting to move my email over to imap, and am a little weary of sending my password over the internet in plaintext. Is there a method currently available in mutt to setup a secure tunnel (via ssh) to the imapd before I open an imap mailbox? I gave the manual a look, but ca

Re: mailboxes

1999-06-24 Thread Terry Reid
On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 09:06:18PM +0200, Holger Eitzenberger wrote: > mailboxes +inbox* > > instead of > > mailboxes +inbox_1 +inbox_2 ... +inbox_n A similar wildcard solution (Michael Elkin's .muttrc distributed with 0.92.5) does not need a specific ("inbox") pattern: mailbox

Re: mailboxes

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
On Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 11:54:17AM +0200, Holger Eitzenberger wrote: [...] > 1. put the line "|/usr/bin/procmail" into you ~/.forward file. You > actually need and MTA (mail tranfser agent) like sendmail or exim > properly configured to recognise the forward file. [...] As an aside: Whe

Re: Mutt+Netscape?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
On Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 12:46:33PM -0700, Brian D. Winters wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 08:36:23AM -0400, Michael Sanders wrote: > > Is it correct that this works with Netscape Communicator, and *not* with > > current versions of Navigator? That is my experience, but not what is > > stated on

Re: Mutt+Netscape?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 08:36:23AM -0400, Michael Sanders wrote: > Is it correct that this works with Netscape Communicator, and *not* with > current versions of Navigator? That is my experience, but not what is > stated on Netscape's Web site. Ok, so maybe I should test these things before I spe

*argh* - html-mails (war: Re: problem with mutt/mailcap)

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Lars Hecking hat ueber "Re: problem with mutt/mailcap" geschrieben: > > But now I get all mails from OE-users, they send each message in > > "text" and "text/html". > > Well, they're bloody lusers and should be asked (kindly ...) to > switch off whatever option is responsible for this behavio

Re: problem with mutt/mailcap

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
David DeSimone hat ueber "Re: problem with mutt/mailcap" geschrieben: > There is a command "alternative_order" that you can use to tell Mutt > which formats it should prefer to show you. I've chosen this: > > alternative_order text/enriched text/plain text/html > > So in this scheme, te

Re: Mutt+Netscape?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 02:12:04PM -0700, Brian D. Winters wrote: > I would expect that is correct, but I haven't confirmed it myself. > The last time I installed Navigator I found no support for mailto: > urls at all, although this was some time ago (maybe an early 4.0?). I have the latest Navi

Re: Mutt+Netscape?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
On Jun 23, 1999, Brian D. Winters wrote: > > Is it correct that this works with Netscape Communicator, and *not* with > > current versions of Navigator? That is my experience, but not what is > > stated on Netscape's Web site. > > I would expect that is correct, but I haven't confirmed it myself.

Re: problem with mutt/mailcap

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Hi All, > There is a command "alternative_order" that you can use to tell Mutt > which formats it should prefer to show you. I've chosen this: > > alternative_order text/enriched text/plain text/html > > So in this scheme, text/plain is preferred over text/html. Yes I tripped over thi

Re: problem with mutt/mailcap

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Michael Thies writes: > Ronny Haryanto hat ueber "Re: problem with mutt/mailcap" geschrieben: > > > text/html; lynx -dump %s ; nametemplate=%s.html ; copiousoutput > > > > text/html; lynx -force_html -dump %s ; copiousoutput > > It's nice, but I would like to get this only working, if the tex

Re: problem with mutt/mailcap

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Michael Thies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > text/html; lynx -force_html -dump %s ; copiousoutput > > It's nice, but I would like to get this only working, if the text/html > is the only or first part of the mail. It depends on how the message is formatted. > But now I get all mails from OE-u

Re: problem with mutt/mailcap

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Ronny Haryanto hat ueber "Re: problem with mutt/mailcap" geschrieben: > > text/html; lynx -dump %s ; nametemplate=%s.html ; copiousoutput > > text/html; lynx -force_html -dump %s ; copiousoutput It's nice, but I would like to get this only working, if the text/html is the only or first part

Re: No colors after upgrade

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
you may also want to check which libraries you are linking against in your upgraded version of mutt. Slang and ncurses have different ideas about what kind of terminals do colour. You may be linking against slang now where you were previously using ncurses... - Original Message - From: Ro

Re: problem with mutt/mailcap

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
On 23-Jun-1999, David Shaw wrote: > > and the following in my ~/.mailcap: > > text/html; lynx -force_html %s; needsterminal; > > However, when I open a message that has html content attached, I get: > > mailcap entry for type text/html not found > > Try: > text/html; lynx -dump %s ;

Re: uudecode .html -> Text/html

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 10:32:47AM -0400, RH Linux User wrote: > My apology if this has been addressed before. > > Anybody has a working configuration of .procmailrc or emil.cf to > uudecode .html email to mime type text/html? > Placing this in emil.cf should work: Match MIME"tex

Re: mailboxes

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 09:39:23PM -0500, Alex Lane wrote: > Please pardon what must be a newbie question, but there must be > something I'm missing in the documentation to mutt. How does one > arrange it so that mail from various lists (which invariably arrives > addressed "To:" that list) is so

Re: No colors after upgrade

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 10:18:14PM +0200, Holger Eitzenberger wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 07:04:17PM +0200, Robert-Jan Kuijvenhoven wrote: > > I used mutt 0.95.3i for a few months and I had perfect colors in > > mutt. Now I have upgraded to 0.95.6i and I lost all colors in > > mutt. The collo