Re: save-hook II

1999-09-27 Thread Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE
David DeSimone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The problem here is that the default behaviour for mutt for the save > > command (using the user's username from the email address) can not be > > re-established in any way once you have specified a def

Re: save-hook II

1999-09-27 Thread Mikko Hänninen
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 27 Sep 1999: > save-hook . =%O Without trying that out, if it works, it's exactly what I was after. Thanks. :) Mikko -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer // net.f

Re: save-hook II

1999-09-27 Thread David DeSimone
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The problem here is that the default behaviour for mutt for the save > command (using the user's username from the email address) can not be > re-established in any way once you have specified a default save-hook > (save-hook . +folder, or using ~A, o

Re: save-hook II

1999-09-27 Thread Mikko Hänninen
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 27 Sep 1999: > For instance, perhaps I am reading mail in my mutt-users folder. Then > something jogs my memory, and I realize I need to send mail to my friend > Joe. Are you saying that, just because I am viewing mail in my > mutt-users folder, t

Re: save-hook II

1999-09-27 Thread David DeSimone
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've asked this before. Since nobody has answered, I think it means > it can't be done. Once you've established a default save hook, you > can't get rid of it, you can only change it (?). I think that's right. > The proper solution would probably b

Re: save-hook II

1999-09-27 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 27 Sep 1999: > yes, this is simple, but I want to keep "default" behavior, which is save mail to > folder with name "=from.who". I've asked this before. Since nobody has answered, I think it means it can't be done. Once you've

Re: Number of Lines

1999-09-27 Thread David DeSimone
Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is unfortunately no way to get a line count from the server > without downloading the messages. But, you can see the size of the > messages in bytes. Change your $index_format variable to use > something like (%4c) instead of (%4l). On a relate

Re: save-hook II

1999-09-27 Thread Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE
Staffan Hamala ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE wrote: > > > I define one save-hook (folder-hook +work 'save-hook .* =work-done') and when I > > change to another mailbox save-hook is still =work-done. I find, that I can > > You have to set a d

Re: save-hook II

1999-09-27 Thread Staffan Hamala
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE wrote: > I define one save-hook (folder-hook +work 'save-hook .* =work-done') and when I > change to another mailbox save-hook is still =work-done. I find, that I can You have to set a default for mutt to change back after you've visited a fo

Re: .saves-{pid}-{machine} files

1999-09-27 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-09-24 14:01:39 -0400, Alec Habig wrote: > .saves-1074902-budoe.bu.edu > This isn't the editor temporary file (this current editing session is > mutt-1093277), but rather is a file which contains the names of the > edited mail messages. The current one looks like These files are no

Re: segmentation fault

1999-09-27 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-09-25 19:31:24 +0200, peter pilsl wrote: > I was using mutt for a long time without any problems. A few days > ago I decided to upgrade to mutt1.0pre2i and now I am doomed. There have been several reports of this kind of bug before. Typically, they were caused by incomplete or incorrect

save-hook II

1999-09-27 Thread Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE
hi I have still probl. with save hook. I define one save-hook (folder-hook +work 'save-hook .* =work-done') and when I change to another mailbox save-hook is still =work-done. I find, that I can define save-hook to ~f or ~F but it's not good. Example: if From adress is "Mutt Users <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Error building mutt

1999-09-27 Thread Heinz Diehl
On Sun Sep 26 1999, Heinz Diehl wrote: > can not guess host type: you must specify one I'm quoting myself here, the solution to this problem is trivial, the GCC-2.95.x install routines does not create a simple link "cc" to "gcc" :) ~ hd