> $record certainly is the default fcc location specification. The other
> two variables that might affect things are $save_name and $force_name.
> Do you have them set, perhaps? (Check with ":set ?save_name") They
> both are unset by default.
>
> > I tried an fcc-hook to rememdy the problem,
Got this error, when trying to print
sh: mp: command not found
lpr: stdin: empty input file
Press any key to continue...
when it exited to the shell, came back, doesn't look like anything went
to spool
My two cents on formatting...
On 00-01-29 23:31, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> There's one more reason: mutt and vim (and I think this is the most
Formatting made easy with vim...
Try this:
set editor=vim_for_mutt
Script vim_for_mutt:
#!/usr/local/bin/bash
if [ $# -ne 1 ]
then
echo "Usage: $0 "
Does anyone know if there is a hack/patch for mutt to enable the Role
selection as in Pine ? I have a need to answer email based on the sender
and respond as various addreses andneed to do so quickly. Any Ideas?
Jander Sunstar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- "Watch the Watchers"
2000-01-29-19:41:36 Christopher Uy:
> In the mean while, adding that 'h' flag to your rule should get
> you by until then.
Since the "h" makes it more efficient, it seems like a good idea to
include anyway.
Here's what I'm using these days, purely swiped from the
PGP-Notes.txt that comes with mu
PGP message
* Christopher Uy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000130 01:25]:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 11:19:48PM +0100, Terje Elde wrote:
> >
> > I'm really tired, but unless I've misunderstood something, you wanted:
> >
>
> I was too literal with my writing. :-) I indented the example out of
> habit. :-)
>
> Do wh
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 11:19:48PM +0100, Terje Elde wrote:
>
> I'm really tired, but unless I've misunderstood something, you wanted:
>
I was too literal with my writing. :-) I indented the example out of
habit. :-)
Do what you did, but put it at the beginning of the line with no
indentation
* Christopher Uy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000129 23:06]:
> Try signing the following in-line - without using mutt's built in PGP
> handling.
>
> E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> When it's signed in-line and flows through procmail, the body get
> rewritten to:
>
> E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 02:36:10PM -0500, Jim Breton wrote:
> As some of you may remember I just "discovered" Mutt only a few days
> ago. Well, those few days have been awesome, Mutt is unbelievable!
I felt like this too :)
> I do have a few questions though. :)
>
> For one, I'm always wonder
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 09:08:57PM +0100, Terje Elde wrote:
>
> I have no problems with the mentioned procmail version under FreeBSD. I'm
> able to handle both encrypted and signed messages. The only patch applied
> by the FreeBSD port system to the source code itself is in recommend.c,
> thus it
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 02:31:20PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> ...and then Jim Breton said...
> % Do people generally find it annoying if I don't use line wrap in my editor
>
> Actually, yes. It's only because everyone here is so polite that you
> haven't been flamed for it already, but it's a pre
Jim Breton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 29 Jan 2000:
> As some of you may remember I just "discovered" Mutt only a few days
> ago. Well, those few days have been awesome, Mutt is unbelievable!
I'm glad you think so. And I wholeheartedly agree! :-)
> I do have a few questions though. :)
Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 29 Jan 2000:
> Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 12:30:04 -0600
> From: Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: fcc's to sent
Hmmm, as a tip, if you want a remail a message originally sent to a
different address, you can b(ounce)
* Christopher Uy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000129 20:17]:
> Will lose a whitespace before the colon. I was pulling my hair out
> for a while trying to find out why some of my signed messages were
> coming back with bad signature errors.
I have no problems with the mentioned procmail version under Fre
Jim Breton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 29 Jan 2000:
> If I want to trigger a command in the "mutt" folder but not in
> "mutt-sent" how can I do this? The hook seems to make a match on either
> one.
>
> I've tried "mutt" and "=mutt" for the hook. There must be some regexp
> pattern that wo
Sorry if anyone gets this twice. I sent it yesterday but for some reason it didn't
show up on the list, and a couple msgs I wrote just a few mins ago have already shown
up so I figure it's pretty safe to say this msg got lost somehow.
I'm also taking this opportunity to add another question. :
Jim --
...and then Jim Breton said...
% Do people generally find it annoying if I don't use line wrap in my editor
Actually, yes. It's only because everyone here is so polite that you
haven't been flamed for it already, but it's a pretty big peeve.
Oh, wait; this is the mutt-users list. I gue
Yep you were right. Thanks. :)
Btw, this leads me to another question. Suppose I have two folders, one called "mutt"
and the other one is "mutt-sent"
If I want to trigger a command in the "mutt" folder but not in "mutt-sent" how can I
do this? The hook seems to make a match on either one.
I am not sure why this is happening, but I would like all mail I send to
only go to "sent" folder inside of my Mailbox (~/Msgs). ~/Mail is
symlinked to ~/Msgs for Procmail.
I have a referrece of "set record = +sent"
However mail likes to go to "clug", for a mailing list, and to "Sent".
I t
* Jim Breton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat Jan 29 13:18 -0500:
> I've been doing this on my qmail system; however, qmail still puts
> a "Return-Path" header on the message which indicates the local
> username who called "sendmail." I haven't found any way around
> this yet.
>
> You can set the $QMAILU
Quick question. Do people generally find it annoying if I don't use line wrap in my
editor (vim)? I see that most other people on this list appear to be using line wrap
in their editors, I always left mine disabled figuring the client's reader/pager would
handle the wrapping. Is this a bad i
* Jim Breton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000129 12:40]:
> folder-hook =mutt "my_hdr From: Jim Breton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
>
> But if I load mutt like this:
>
> mutt -f ~/mail/mutt
A guess (untested because I don't have time right now to test it) is
that it's noticing that "~/mail/mutt" != "=mutt
Haha -- guess what. :) Just on a whim I tried setting the Return-Path with a
"my_hdr" command and qmail did honor it! Perfect!
I was all excited about it, but you beat me to the punch. :)
Thanks!
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 08:42:58PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Jim Breton <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Jim Breton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 29 Jan 2000:
> I've been doing this on my qmail system; however, qmail still puts a
> "Return-Path" header on the message which indicates the local username
> who called "sendmail." I haven't found any way around this yet.
Ahh. That's the envelope se
Hi, it seems that my folder hooks are not run when I load a specific folder from the
command line.
For instance, I have a folder hook that looks like this:
folder-hook =mutt "my_hdr From: Jim Breton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
But if I load mutt like this:
mutt -f ~/mail/mutt
It does not set
I've been doing this on my qmail system; however, qmail still puts a "Return-Path"
header on the message which indicates the local username who called "sendmail." I
haven't found any way around this yet.
You can set the $QMAILUSER and $QMAILHOST env vars to specify what you want in the
Return
Hello,
I've been using mutt for sometime now, but just signed up for this
list today, so I apologize if this has already been discussed. :-)
There is a bug in the current version of procmail (3.14 - not sure if
it goes back further than that) that does not allow the procmail
recipe supplied in t
Patrick Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 28 Jan 2000:
> As far as I can tell setting the From: when using qmail with mutt
> requires that the environment variables MAILUSER, MAILHOST, MAILNAME
> be set before starting mutt, along with QMAILINJECT=f.
It doesn't require them, though can spec
As far as I can tell setting the From: when using qmail with mutt
requires that the environment variables MAILUSER, MAILHOST, MAILNAME
be set before starting mutt, along with QMAILINJECT=f.
Is there a way to set the From: within a mutt session when using
qmail as the MTA?
--
Patrick Walsh
Edmon
On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 10:43:29PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-01-28 20:44:17 +, Marius Gedminas wrote:
>
> > Perhaps Mutt should recognize KEY_FIND and KEY_SELECT as synonyms
> > for KEY_HOME and KEY_END?
>
> You should better submit bug reports against the various termcap
> ent
31 matches
Mail list logo
