Could someone please verify whether or not the attached
pgp6.rc works? (Replace pgp6 by pgp!)
On 2000-03-13 22:10:26 +0100, Gero Treuner wrote:
> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 22:10:26 +0100
> From: Gero Treuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - R
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:16:18PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 02:33:06AM +, J McKitrick wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 04:50:40PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
Sorry about that. I didn't see the new messages in the other thread
until after I sent that. I've got to
In poking around the mutt manual, I discovered that a) opening mutt
with the -y switch opens the directory browser with (apparently)
updated N indicator. Alternatively, pressing the tab key while in the
directory browser will do the same.
Over the next couple days, I intend to try some XWindow b
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 02:33:06AM +, J McKitrick wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 04:50:40PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > Navigate using upper-case letters 'J' and 'K'.
>
> Navigating isn't the problem, it's when i want to go to a message i
> just deleted. Is there any way besides typing
J McKitrick [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I understand that the C, T, and + symbols help identify when a message
> is also addressed to me specifically. However, a couple of messages
> lately have not correctly shown bme to be recipients. Now, i changed
> my from header a couple of times trying t
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 04:51:36PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> Peter Poeml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> are bound to). The default bindinds for these functions are "J" and
> "K", which are the shifted letters. VI users will find these bindings
> convenient. Others will likely not find th
I understand that the C, T, and + symbols help identify when a message
is also addressed to me specifically. However, a couple of messages
lately have not correctly shown bme to be recipients. Now, i changed
my from header a couple of times trying to get it exactly how i
wanted. How can i reset
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 04:50:40PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 06:09:55PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
> > I know mutt has an option (resolve) to not move to the next message
> > after performing an action. If i delete a message, is there any way
> > to get back to that mess
Correction: my mistake. I forgot shifted-J and K are different.
Thanks.
jm
--
-
Jonathon McKitrick / [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
"I prefer the term Artificial Person myself."/
-
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 01:19:29AM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
> > One other thing: mutt has to be built with GNU make. The standard SysV
> > UNIX make that comes with HP-UX won't work.
>
> Details? I, too, have seen problems, but with BSD makes.
Sure. The problem has to do with the expansio
> CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I/usr/include/curses_colr"
> LIBS="$LIBS -lcur_colr"
Hhm, yes, I remember seeing this before :)
> One other thing: mutt has to be built with GNU make. The standard SysV
> UNIX make that comes with HP-UX won't work.
Details? I, too, have seen problems, but w
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 05:14:34PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've had to hack the configure script of previous releases (0.95.4 and
> > 1.0) to get them to use the proper curses library on my HP-UX 10.20
> > system. Is this still necessary?
>
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 06:09:55PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
> I know mutt has an option (resolve) to not move to the next message
> after performing an action. If i delete a message, is there any way
> to get back to that message besides entering the message number? The
> index skips deleted me
Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've had to hack the configure script of previous releases (0.95.4 and
> 1.0) to get them to use the proper curses library on my HP-UX 10.20
> system. Is this still necessary?
I've never had trouble with the --with-slang or --with-curses configure
dire
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 10:26:09AM -0800, Drew Bloechl wrote:
> OS: Debian woody (Linux 2.2.13, i386)
> mutt 1.1.5
> MTA is Postfix 19991231.
> Delivering to mailboxes with Procmail using locking rules.
> FS is ext2.
Duh. I didn't know I had to specify them with "mailboxes". I feel
stupi
Peter Poeml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can also go to the message just above the deleted one, and press
> 'u'. Will not work when there is no undeleted mail above or when
> there are too many other deleted mails above, though.
This is really just a side-effect of the undelete operation,
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 09:24:00PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Works like a charm on HP-UX 10.20
That's good news! I've had to hack the configure script of previous
releases (0.95.4 and 1.0) to get them to use the proper curses library
on my HP-UX 10.20 system. Is this still necessary? W
On 2000-03-13 16:03:43 -0500, Brendan Cully wrote:
> I've got a bug report from Rex Walters that read-only
> mailboxes on IMAP override ACLs incorrectly.
> Specifically, if a mailbox is readonly you can't set or
> unset the Seen flag, even if you have permission to
> according to the ACL.
What y
I know mutt has an option (resolve) to not move to the next message
after performing an action. If i delete a message, is there any way
to get back to that message besides entering the message number? The
index skips deleted messages when navigating, of course.
jm
--
--
Hi!
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:03:37PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless
> someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
> be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that version
> later that week.
A pgp6.rc file to use PGP 6 wi
On Monday, 13 March 2000 at 20:03, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Mutt-1.1.9 is out on ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/,
> and the usual mirror sites, see
> http://www.mutt.org/download.html.
>
> Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless
> someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd con
Is there a way to list the number of messages that are in a folder when
listing the folders? (Checking the format strings in the manual doesn't
seem to indicate so, but I may have overlooked the right place.) Even an
indicator of which folders have old messages would be nice. I'm using mutt
1.0
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 06:14:59PM +, J McKitrick wrote:
>
> I know mutt has an option (resolve) to not move to the next message
> after performing an action. If i delete a message, is there any way
> to get back to that message besides entering the message number? The
> index skips deleted
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:03:37PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless
> someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
> be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that version
> later that week.
Works like a charm on HP-UX 10.20
J McKitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2000:
> If i delete a message, is there any way
> to get back to that message besides entering the message number? The
> index skips deleted messages when navigating, of course.
With the previous-entry or next-entry functions perhaps? They're
Mutt-1.1.9 is out on ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/devel/,
and the usual mirror sites, see
http://www.mutt.org/download.html.
Changes against 1.1.8 are a couple of bug-fixes. Unless
someone has some real show-stoppers, I'd consider this to
be a release candidate for 1.2, and release that version
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:11:16PM +0200, Mikko H?nninen wrote:
> David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2000:
> > Can anyone come up with an explanation for this? I can't.
>
> Me either. Sounds like it was time for some debugging...
> Well, I suppose, I should first see if I c
I know mutt has an option (resolve) to not move to the next message
after performing an action. If i delete a message, is there any way
to get back to that message besides entering the message number? The
index skips deleted messages when navigating, of course.
jm
--
-
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2000:
> Can anyone come up with an explanation for this? I can't.
Me either. Sounds like it was time for some debugging...
Well, I suppose, I should first see if I can reproduce the problem on
my system. If I have free time later today I
Drew Bloechl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> $ ls -l Mail/livid-dev ; ls -lu Mail/livid-dev
> -rw---1 drew drew 3219213 Mar 10 02:23 Mail/livid-dev
> -rw---1 drew drew 3219213 Mar 8 12:05 Mail/livid-dev
>
> This particular folder has an mtime greater than its at
On 2000-03-12 16:24:27 +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> No, they use special kind of wildcards, it's not even shell
> globbing. For them the rules are:
> - "*" is a special entry which means "all headers"
> - "something-" means that every header which starts with
> "something-", eg. "ignore X-"
GASP is a preprocessor for assembly programs and is a part of binutils package.
Raju
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 11:36:40AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 12:31:00PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
>
> > > I hadn't seen "gasp" before -- and it's not in my
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 12:31:00PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > I hadn't seen "gasp" before -- and it's not in my system man pages to
> > learn about. I'd always seen that step as "fsck" and "more" :-)
>
> It's GNU Assembler if I remember right... I've actually heard of one
GNU Assembler
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 12 Mar 2000:
> I dunno from message/partial, but did you try piping all of the segments
> thru good old munpack?
Getting punpack (which I didn't have installed on my workstation),
tagging all the parts, setting pipe-split, and piping to "munpack -t"
did
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 09:13:59PM -0500 or thereabouts, John P. Verel wrote:
> I am trying to understand how the status indicator in the folder list
> (if I'm using the term correctly), gets updated to show new mail in a
> folder.
>
> I've got a half dozen folders created by procmail. My mai
35 matches
Mail list logo
