David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>It's a little trickier when I'm running mutt at the back end of a telnet
>session from WinDoze :-)/2 Now that I've finally gotten around to
Ya, that figures :)
>getting my Linux box up for dialin, I probably could throw myself a
>display from the serv
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 10:59:58PM +0200, Jan Houtsma wrote:
> Now i can finally view word documents in my mutt and it looks great!!
>
> mailcap:
> application/msword; word2html %s; copiousoutput
>
> word2html:
> #!/bin/zsh
> f=/tmp/word2html.$$.html
> wvHtml $1 2>/dev/null >$f
> lynx -dump $f
Brian --
...and then Brian Salter-Duke said...
% On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 10:52:20AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > getting my Linux box up for dialin, I probably could throw myself a
% > display from the server where I actually read mail, but lynx is easier
% > and faster than X over dialup :-)
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 10:52:20AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> Suresh --
>
> ...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
> % David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> %
> % >Meanwhile, I've figured out what's up -- urlview was trying to fire off
> % >netscape, which does me no good whatsoever :-)
Sergei Gerasenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 31 May 2000:
> As I understand the concept of save-hooks, they are intended for routing
> messages to various places after they have been read. The routing is done
> according to some rules. Now, none of that is happening on my computer
> whether
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 06:51:47PM +0200, Jan Houtsma wrote:
> I added the following in /etc/mailcap:
>
> application/msword; word2x %s
>
> But mutt still says:
>
> mailcap entry for type application/msword not found
>
> How do i do this?
>
> Thanks,
> jan
Never mind. I figured it out myself
Thomas, et al --
...and then Thomas Roessler said...
% On 2000-05-31 05:58:08 -0400, David T-G wrote:
%
% > the next week or so, I'll hold off on patching my 1.2
% > with my crazy cocktail...
%
% 1.2.1 will contain a couple of bug fixes, but will look
% like 1.2 feature-wise. No feature patche
Hi,
this is a short addendum to my previous message about
save-hooks. It was suggested that I provide more detail about my muttrc
configuration. Unfortunately, I'm at work right now and can't send you guys a
copy of my muttrc. I hear some of you say "well, then wait till you get home and
t
On 2000-05-31 05:58:08 -0400, David T-G wrote:
> I've seen a few patches and discussions go by, and I
> wonder when we might see 1.2.1 come out. If it's in
> the next week or so, I'll hold off on patching my 1.2
> with my crazy cocktail...
1.2.1 will contain a couple of bug fixes, but will look
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 01:03:51PM -0400, Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
> As I understand the concept of save-hooks, they are intended for routing
> messages to various places after they have been read. The routing is done
> according to some rules. Now, none of that is happening on my
Sergei --
...and then Sergei Gerasenko said...
% Hi guys,
%
% I recently unsubscribed from the list because I was overwhelmed by the
% amount of mail I was getting. I'm now going to use procmail. Anyway, the
Welcome back :-)
% question I have is probably trivial for most of you. I've tried to
Hi guys,
I recently unsubscribed from the list because I was overwhelmed by the
amount of mail I was getting. I'm now going to use procmail. Anyway, the
question I have is probably trivial for most of you. I've tried to define a
couple of save-hooks in my muttrc and none of them have any effect o
I added the following in /etc/mailcap:
application/msword; word2x %s
But mutt still says:
mailcap entry for type application/msword not found
How do i do this?
Thanks,
jan
On 000530, at 15:27:11, Bob Bell wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 08:55:11PM +0300, Mikko Hnninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> > I wonder how something like this could be implemented? It would be
> > quite unpractical to keep a list of tagging order or anything like that.
>
> My thoughts e
Suresh --
...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
% David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
%
% >Meanwhile, I've figured out what's up -- urlview was trying to fire off
% >netscape, which does me no good whatsoever :-) It all works, then, with
%
% You could still tweak it to call netscape
David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>Meanwhile, I've figured out what's up -- urlview was trying to fire off
>netscape, which does me no good whatsoever :-) It all works, then, with
>the built-in defaults -- if you don't stray from that set of assumptions
>and preconditions.
You could sti
Mikko, et al --
Thanks for the defaults and info.
Meanwhile, I've figured out what's up -- urlview was trying to fire off
netscape, which does me no good whatsoever :-) It all works, then, with
the built-in defaults -- if you don't stray from that set of assumptions
and preconditions.
:-D
--
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 13:01:46 -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> At 11:12 -0500 30 May 2000, Ronny Haryanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > an RFC (about multipart or MIME, I can't remember exactly) suggests
> > that the last text/plain part be shown if all of the parts are of the
> > same type. Pleas
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 31 May 2000:
> Ahhh... Don't got one of those. Care to send me one?
I think I'm using the defaults (the example file), or maybe it's from
Debian. So anyway, just for the record, here it is sans comments:
REGEXP (((http|https|ftp|gopher)|mailto):(//)
Hi again!
I suppose I should answer my own question now that I've figured it out;
this works pretty well and I'm even looking at letting my script clear my
procmail log for me.
...and then David @ BigFoot said...
% Hi, folks --
%
% I dump my incoming mail into =F.* with procmail, and I have a l
Suresh --
...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
% David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
%
% What keybindings do you use? I use
...
% and it is pretty ok.
Thanks for your note. I also use Ctrl-B, and I was getting a list of
URLs, but nothing else would happen. Turned out that I neede
Mikko, et al --
...and then Mikko Hänninen said...
% David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 31 May 2000:
% > Hi, guys --
%
% Hi David!
Good late-morning to you :-) I figured someone would be awake and able
to answer this question!
%
...
% > an embedded URL, Ctrl-B properly brings me to
Hi again --
I've seen a few patches and discussions go by, and I wonder when we might
see 1.2.1 come out. If it's in the next week or so, I'll hold off on
patching my 1.2 with my crazy cocktail...
TIA & HAND
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(
David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>to one and hitting return does nothing. Um, what do I do? The urlview
>documentation is surprisingly, well, sparse :-)
What keybindings do you use? I use
# URL highlighting with the same regexp as urlview.
macro index \cb |urlview\n 'call urlview to
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 31 May 2000:
> Hi, guys --
Hi David!
> We've just installed urlview-0.7 from the contrib directory; now we
> have to figure out how to use it. When presented with a message with
> an embedded URL, Ctrl-B properly brings me to a list of them, but going
Hi, guys --
We've just installed urlview-0.7 from the contrib directory; now we
have to figure out how to use it. When presented with a message with
an embedded URL, Ctrl-B properly brings me to a list of them, but going
to one and hitting return does nothing. Um, what do I do? The urlview
doc
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 12:47:31AM -0700, MacHara wrote:
> I am not good at mutt and want to ask you about muttrc..
> Is that kind of forward file??
No. Mutt is a very highly configurable MUA (mail user agent). All
configuration is done via a configuration file, which is parsed during
start up of
27 matches
Mail list logo
