Hi: Well, spent time with the manual, faq, and whatever else I could find on
google. At this point, I am able to call fetchmail, read mail in mutt, and set
emacs as an editor to send a mail message. All looks satisfactory, and sets
the stage to enter the learning curve with working tools [exclu
On 03/01/01, 09:45:10PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
> Dirk Laurie muttered:
> > Is there a mutt function that lest me reply to the "From" address
> > even when "Reply-To" is provided?
>
> For this purpose set ignore_list_reply_to. Maybe in combination with
> sent- or folder-hook.
Hey this is co
I thought I would send this again, since there were no takers the first time.
Hi all,
I just changed boxes, copied my home directory to the new box, fired up mutt
and things seem to be working well. However, I am seeing a message I have
never seen before (or else I wasn't paying very good atten
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 09:10:01PM +, Glyn Millington wrote:
> I recevie the mutt-users list in digest form- and it has been a
> terrific help. But now I wish to unsubscribe. Steve Kennedy
> helped me out with the suggestion that I mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the body o
* Alex Povolotsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [13 Feb 01 12:41]:
> Does anyone have mutt manual in PS format, A4 page?
I have converted the ANSI text into .sdw (StarOffice) whcih I would
be pleased to send you. I use US Letter paper myself, but you could
change that to A4. I hove no experience with pri
Me again.
I recevie the mutt-users list in digest form- and it has been a
terrific help. But now I wish to unsubscribe. Steve Kennedy
helped me out with the suggestion that I mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the body of the
message, and I get a polite message telling me that I a
* Murray Maxwell Dancey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010301 23:51]:
> How can I make new messages to me one color, and new messages in
> general another color? I also want old messages to me to be yet
> another color.
# messages to me (requires $alternates)
color index cyan default ~p
# new messages
c
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010301 21:44]:
> I have a question about your formail suggestion. The individual
> messages that make up the digest only have 2 headers: "From" and
> "Subject". So when I run formail, the resulting messages don't have
> anything unique that procmail can
How can I make new messages to me one color, and new messages in
general another color? I also want old messages to me to be yet
another color.
Im trying...
color indexcyandefault "(~p) ~N"
color indexbrightcyan default "~p"
color indexgreen de
Hi!
I noticed a problem with mutt_ssl.c when compiling latest CVS version. An #if
directive was comparing OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER against a constant that was
missing a trailing zero. This caused a feature to be used that was not
available in my version of OpenSSL. I have included below a patch th
On Thu, Mar 1, 2001, Michael Tatge wrote:
> That's exatly the problem here. Don't use my_hdr when you use
> reverse_name. my_hdr always overwrites any other header settings.
>
> Here's my config:
>
> # Configure From:
> set realname="Michael Tatge"
> set from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> set use_from
Ken Weingold muttered:
> I am still trying to get this to work and it is not. I also get mail
> at different address and would like mutt to change the From: field to
> that address the email to which I am replying to was sent. I have
> 'set reverse_name' and 'set alternatives' with the address s
Dirk Laurie muttered:
> Very properly, mutt replies to the "Reply-To" address if one is set.
> I belong to some mailing lists where "Reply-To" is set to the list.
> This is OK if I wish to send to the sender and the list ("g") or to
> the list only ("r") but not if I wish to reply to the sender on
I have a question about your formail suggestion. The individual
messages that make up the digest only have 2 headers: "From" and
"Subject". So when I run formail, the resulting messages don't have
anything unique that procmail can use to identify them as being from
mutt-users. Other list's dige
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:37:26PM +0100, Kai Weber wrote:
> + Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > This works fine in Xterm, however in Eterm this brings up a mod menu for
> > the Eterm I am working in. Does anyone know how to change this behavior?
>
> Had this problem, too. Someone on this
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:28:56AM +0100, Christian R Molls
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know that I have read about this matter before, but had no luck
> searching the archives: what possibilities are there to fix that
> issue? I´m thinking of a macro/script combination called from withing
> m
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:41:25PM +0100, Jan Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:28:56AM +0100, Christian R Molls
> wrote:
> >I usually read my mail sorted by threads. Once in a while (on
> >some lists the while is pretty short), threading breaks because
> >some moron hit the "Reply"-Bu
I am still trying to get this to work and it is not. I also get mail
at different address and would like mutt to change the From: field to
that address the email to which I am replying to was sent. I have
'set reverse_name' and 'set alternatives' with the address set, and it
still puts in the my
* Jan Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010301 14:47]:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:28:56AM +0100, Christian R Molls wrote:
> >I usually read my mail sorted by threads. Once in a while (on some
> >lists the while is pretty short), threading breaks because some
> >moron hit the "Reply"-Button not to
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:28:56AM +0100, Christian R Molls
wrote:
>I usually read my mail sorted by threads. Once in a while (on
>some lists the while is pretty short), threading breaks because
>some moron hit the "Reply"-Button not to reply but to compose a
>message completely unrelated to the o
+ Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This works fine in Xterm, however in Eterm this brings up a mod menu for
> the Eterm I am working in. Does anyone know how to change this behavior?
Had this problem, too. Someone on this list helped me (sorry, forget
who exactly). Add this lines to your the
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:51:16AM +, Chris Green wrote:
>
> Maybe what I'm seeing is my *local* system displaying the characters
> correctly (I'm doing this via telnet) and cat, more and vi are simply
> sending the 8-bit characters "as is" whereas mutt and less are being
> 'correct' and sayi
Well, I know I can change my localhost to be a weired name...
That is not point. (faking host name with exim is easy too.)
But, jeff you are not even doing it either
Received: (from jeff@localhost)
My question is how I can change Mutt behavior deciding on
which mail are from local machine.
* Dirk Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010301 09:43]:
> Very properly, mutt replies to the "Reply-To" address if one is set.
> I belong to some mailing lists where "Reply-To" is set to the list.
> This is OK if I wish to send to the sender and the list ("g") or to
> the list only ("r") but not if I w
yes PGP is working, I use it on saved messages. Btw. it also says cat: write error:
Broken pipe
And it worked with pine well (with pgp4pine addon)
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:51:28AM -0800, Jay Rossiter / Signe wrote:
> On 03/01, Jan Hudak spat into the ether:
> > Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 09:41:36 +
On 03/01, Jan Hudak spat into the ether:
> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 09:41:36 +0100
> From: Jan Hudak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: PGP and mutt
> Mail-Followup-To: Jan Hudak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
>
> I have pgp 6.5.8 freeware instal
I've installed mutt and included pgp6.rc from mutt doc directory in .muttrc.
I have pgp 6.5.8 freeware installed and working.
I've added header rewrite rules for pgp messages (non-mime) in .procmailrc.
When I open such a message, mutt tries to invoke pgp on it but pgp failes on recieve
of signal
Very properly, mutt replies to the "Reply-To" address if one is set.
I belong to some mailing lists where "Reply-To" is set to the list.
This is OK if I wish to send to the sender and the list ("g") or to
the list only ("r") but not if I wish to reply to the sender only.
E.g. "Listen old chap, I d
This works fine in Xterm, however in Eterm this brings up a mod menu for
the Eterm I am working in. Does anyone know how to change this behavior?
--
/Jason G Helfman
"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always
been in your possession."
Fingerprint: 6A32
29 matches
Mail list logo
