At 16:20 -0700 09 Jul 2001, Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok so i am trying to be as descriptive as possible, but let me know if
> there's other pertinent information needed.
> i'm getting a segfault (and my terminal gets all wonky so that i have to
> 'reset') when replying to a messag
I just installed mutt on a Unix box I started setting up recently, so
I'm pretty new to both mutt and Unix. I have six questions:
1) When I tried to connect and download mail, I got a 'can't lock
/var/mail/bob' message. I dug through various documents and found a
reference in the FAQ to dotloc
ok so i am trying to be as descriptive as possible, but let me know if
there's other pertinent information needed.
i'm getting a segfault (and my terminal gets all wonky so that i have to
'reset') when replying to a message with the following headers. is it a
problem with apple mail's mime versio
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 03:52:33PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> > How can I know for certain whether color is supported on
> > version 6.1 of exceed run on NT? I live on xterm sessions which
> > access a solaris box (Sunos 5.5.1) and color would be nice.
>
> This file contains lots of color w
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Chris Fuchs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How can I know for certain whether color is supported on
> version 6.1 of exceed run on NT? I live on xterm sessions which
> access a solaris box (Sunos 5.5.1) and color would be nice.
>
> This works:
> mono header bold Subject:
>
> This doesn't:
Hi,
How can I know for certain whether color is supported on
version 6.1 of exceed run on NT? I live on xterm sessions which
access a solaris box (Sunos 5.5.1) and color would be nice.
This works:
mono header bold Subject:
This doesn't:
color header red black Subject:
The above suggests my se
So sprach Dominik Vogt am Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 02:51:09PM +0200:
> Now imagine I'm a user who does not know how email works on the
> server side. I'll never have the slightest idea that this is
> equivalent to the question I have. Mine is: "How do I
> automatically move my mail into folders?" I
* Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010709 14:51]:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 12:27:01PM +0100, John Arundel wrote:
> >
> > I'm arguing for greater usability through greater simplicity. Anyone who
> > really cannot get on with mutt and its associated mail toolk
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 01:29:28PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> On 09.07.2001 10:31:16 Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> > I strongly disagree. Of course it does not make sense to
> > re-implement procmail in mutt. But the average user does not need
> > 5 percent of procmail's functionality anyway. O
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 12:27:01PM +0100, John Arundel wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 12:58:06PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > - I want to do xyz.
> > - My mail client can't do it.
>
> See the Mutt FAQ:
>
> "How can I make Mutt use a SMTP server to send email, like Pine or
> [insert favouri
Louis LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on
07/09/2001:
> On 07/09/01 06:02 AM, darren chamberlain sat at the `puter and typed:
> > Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 07/09/2001:
> > > thanks for the responses about my first question. i have
On 07/09/01 06:02 AM, darren chamberlain sat at the `puter and typed:
> Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 07/09/2001:
> > thanks for the responses about my first question. i have one other
> > (possibly dumb) question that i haven't been able to figure out (point
>
Sam Carleton
> Move read messages to ~/mbox? ([n]/y):
> Is there any way to suppress this message?
set move=no
-suresh
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 10:51:19AM +0100, John Arundel wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 10:31:16AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > I strongly disagree.
>
> That's your privilege, of course.
>
> > Of course it does not make sense to
> > re-implement procmail in mutt. But the average user does not
On 09.07.2001 10:31:16 Dominik Vogt wrote:
> I strongly disagree. Of course it does not make sense to
> re-implement procmail in mutt. But the average user does not need
> 5 percent of procmail's functionality anyway. On the other hand,
> many users like to have some mail filtering but are una
Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 07/09/2001:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 12:09:49PM +0100, John Arundel wrote:
> > Sure, you can do extraordinary things with mutt, but sometimes it's
> > better to use the tool for the job. Adding procmail-style mail filtering
> > fun
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 12:09:49PM +0100, John Arundel wrote:
> Sure, you can do extraordinary things with mutt, but sometimes it's
> better to use the tool for the job. Adding procmail-style mail filtering
> functionality to mutt would not make it a better mail client, just a poor
> cousin to pro
Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 07/09/2001:
> thanks for the responses about my first question. i have one other
> (possibly dumb) question that i haven't been able to figure out (point
> me to the appropriate faq if i'm missing something).
>
> is there any way
Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 07/09/2001:
> Is it possible to source different mutt config files somehow based on a shell
> script type thingie?
>
> I guess I could have my .zshrc copy the appropriate mutt config file to
> .muttrc based on where i'm logging in
Hello,
I want to configure mutt to send mail to SMTP server using nullmailer.
For this I need to change the .muttrc file option
set sendmail="usr/local/bin/nullmailer -options"
nullmailer uses three commands nullmailer-inject,nullmailer-queue and and
nullmailer-send.
Can anybody kindly tell me w
thanks for the responses about my first question. i have one other
(possibly dumb) question that i haven't been able to figure out (point
me to the appropriate faq if i'm missing something).
is there any way to bind something to go to the next unread message in
another folder (other than the def
21 matches
Mail list logo
