Hello all,
I've just recently upgraded to mutt 1.3.22 and it seems I can no longer
delete mail from my inbox - /var/spool/mail/doug
Could someone point me to the relevant documentation ?
Thanks,
Doug
Doug Kearns [21/09/01 19:25 +1000]:
> I've just recently upgraded to mutt 1.3.22 and it seems I can no longer
> delete mail from my inbox - /var/spool/mail/doug
> Could someone point me to the relevant documentation ?
Check the permissions of your mailbox - and see if there's a mutt dotlock
ther
Hi All
I am having some trouble emailing specific attachments (file types). I can
send html attachments fine but my pdf files get corrupted.
Any ideas?
Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks,
Scott Trafford
_
Get your FREE dow
Thanks for all your suggestions, here the results:
running file on it returns: ASCII English text
(file ~/Mail/archive/postponed returns the same)
(file ~/Mail/archive/mutt returns ASCII mail text)
but both are recognized as mail files by vim and mutt
cat -vET only shows the $ after every last w
[20.09.01 22:18 +0200] Piet Delport <-- :
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2001 at 10:03:53 -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
> > Erika Pacholleck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on 09/20/2001:
> >
> > mbox files are separated by "\nFrom " (basically).
> >
> > > The headers contain these lines
> > > >From xxx
> > > Dat
Doug --
...and then Doug Kearns said...
% Hello all,
Hi!
%
% I've just recently upgraded to mutt 1.3.22 and it seems I can no longer
% delete mail from my inbox - /var/spool/mail/doug
It sounds like mutt can't write to your spool file, or at least thinks it
can't. I trust that you've tried
Scott --
...and then Scott Trafford said...
% Hi All
Hello!
%
% I am having some trouble emailing specific attachments (file types). I can
% send html attachments fine but my pdf files get corrupted.
How very interesting. That doesn't make any sense.
%
% Any ideas?
Post a [small!] one
Piet --
...and then Piet Delport said...
% On Thu, 20 Sep 2001 at 08:21:14 -0400, David T-G wrote:
% [...]
% > My muttrc has
% >
% > macro pager ,@r13on "set
display_filter=$HOME/local/bin/rot13\nmacro pager \\cx
,@r13off\n"
% > macro pager ,@r13off "set display_filter=\nmacro
pager\\cx ,
Byrial --
...and then Byrial Jensen said...
% On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 09:21:52 -0400, David T-G wrote:
% > %
% > % macro pager ,@r13on "set
display_filter=$HOME/local/bin/rot13\nmacro pager \\cx
,@r13off\n"
...
%
% You can do it a little shorter as several commands can be entered at
% the s
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 02:55:44PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Doug Kearns [21/09/01 19:25 +1000]:
> > I've just recently upgraded to mutt 1.3.22 and it seems I can no longer
> > delete mail from my inbox - /var/spool/mail/doug
> > Could someone point me to the relevant documentation ?
Miguel Farah F. [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Also: one of the nice things about tin (the news reader) is that it
> lets you have a random signature (there's a fixed part and a random
> one, selected from the files in a directory previously declared). It'd
> be nice it mutt could do that as well.
>
hello,
is there a way to delete all the messages with the same
message id upon entering a folder?
should i even be doing this with mutt?
(i am sure i could write an awk script to do this, but
perhaps its easier to do with mutt?)
thanks,
denis
--
// mailto: Denis Perelyubskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTE
msg.pgp
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 12:54:25AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Denis Perelyubskiy [21/09/01 12:12 -0700]:
> > is there a way to delete all the messages with the same
> > message id upon entering a folder?
>
> You could do this better with procmail (man procmailex for how to suppress
>
> is there a way to delete all the messages with the
> same message id upon entering a folder?
>
> should i even be doing this with mutt?
'procmail' can do this for you. This recipe, shamelessly
stolen from Tom Gilbert's website should do it:
:0 Whc: msgid.lock
| formail -D 16384 msgid.cache
:0
* Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-Fri-01 12:28 -0700]:
>
>Denis Perelyubskiy [21/09/01 12:12 -0700]:
>> is there a way to delete all the messages with the same
>> message id upon entering a folder?
>
>You could do this better with procmail (man procmailex for how to suppress
Hall Stevenson wrote:
> 'procmail' can do this for you. This recipe, shamelessly
> stolen from Tom Gilbert's website should do it:
>
> :0 Whc: msgid.lock
> | formail -D 16384 msgid.cache
> :0 a:
> duplicates
this is metioned (as suresh said) in the procmailex man page.
> You can change 'duplica
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:12:24PM -0700, Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
> hello,
>
> is there a way to delete all the messages with the same
> message id upon entering a folder?
>
> should i even be doing this with mutt?
> (i am sure i could write an awk script to do this, but
> perhaps its easier t
Dan Boger [21/09/01 15:29 -0400]:
> hmmm... limiting on ~h [EMAIL PROTECTED] did
> limit my index to show only this past message... ?
Drat. I was thinking of Tags. You are right of course.
-suresh
--
key at wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net
PGP signature
> :0 Whc: msgid.lock
> | formail -D 16384 msgid.cache
> :0 a:
> duplicates
>
> You can change 'duplicates' to '/dev/null' if you trust the
> recipe works.
No, you shouldn't. Unfortunately, the procmailex man page doesn't mention
that procmail may fail for reasons other than "... their own scr
Paul Tremblay spake thus: (Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 04:04:53PM -0400)
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 09:09:43PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Right, you don't have access to the bcc. But procmail still should be
> able to read the ^To line. It seems very simple. If the ^To line (I
> mean, the actual
Nate Johnston wrote:
> My pet peeve is messages that have no To or Cc, but are sent with only a
> Bcc, or a false To. To filter this you have to let the catchall rule do
> it. Sadly, there isnt an easy way to filter based on the expression "If $x
> doesn't match any address I know".
i suppose y
Hi, all --
I usually collapse all of my threads to make things easier to manage and
to make it easy to see when a thread has a new message, but that means
that I cannot search well -- or at least I think it does.
I was just looking for a particular address and searched three or four
times with d
Hello all,
I am trying to use par, but I seem to be having a significant amount of
difficulty. Par successfully mangles both my signature (below) and my
headers when I have edit_headers set. I really like the automated
reindentation, but first I need a recipe that does not cause the
headers and
Hello!
the viewer of mutt displays iso signs as backslashed hex nums e.g.:
t\351l\351phone i looked into the FAQ and setted some LC vars, but it
didn't change anything (and in the FAQ they spoke of ?? signs instead of
the iso signs..)
so what goes wrong here?
--
ciao bboett
==
Thank you too, that'll be waht I was looking for.
I'll give it a try.
regards
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 07:19:01PM -0400, Miguel Farah F. wrote:
> Andreas Ntaflos [19/09/2001 18:35] dijo/said:
> >Hello all,
> > I'm new to this list, althoug I've been using
> >Mutt for over a year now (withou
Thanks for your help.
I tried ":set ?alternates" on all the machines that have mutt installed
and with one exception I got 'alternates=""' on all machines. The one
exception simply cleared the command line and printed nothing. to clear
up any ambiguity I edited all the config files and explicit
--wq9mPyueHGvFACwf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001 at 00:01:41 +0200, Erika Pacholleck wrote:
[snip]
> These are the headers in real, anonymized of course:
> snip --- this is the very
Nate Johnston [21/09/01 14:36 -0500]:
> I call par as 'par 72gqr' in a shell script, and my PARINIT is
> "rTbgqR B=.,?_A_a Q=_s>|", which is the reccomended default.
> Does anyone have any par configs they would reccomend?
map V 0!}par w76
PGP signature
David T-G [21/09/01 16:44 -0400]:
> Is there a way to search every message in a collapsed mailbox and get
> any results? I leave open, if this is unimplemented, of how to control
Search for "grepmail" on freshmeat.
> where the pointer lands (on the top of the thread, virtually (or actually,
>
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 04:52:07 +0200, Piet Delport wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2001 at 00:01:41 +0200, Erika Pacholleck wrote:
> [snip]
> > These are the headers in real, anonymized of course:
> > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 26 Aug 2001 02:46:52 -0500
> > The only differences between my normal mut
31 matches
Mail list logo
