On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Preben Randhol wrote:
Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/01/2002 (19:11) :
You're not responding to his question. (w3m doesn't do javascript
No I didn't say it did. I just said w3m is better than lynx.
tsk, tsk (you should go back and read the paragraph
Hi,
One (hopefully easily answered) question:
In my index_format I'm using %f to show the From: address of the
message. Sometimes people have a From: header like this:
,-
| A Good Person [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-
(note: they don't all use aol)
In the index this displays with the quotation marks
Benjamin Smith wrote:
In the index this displays with the quotation marks included and this
looks kinda weird, I'm just wondering if this is correct behaviour,
and even if it is, what can be done about it.
i'm pretty sure this usually depends on whether characters in the
sender's name
When I read a mail, I usually try to filter my mail from the pager. Every
thing looks fine until I go into my subfolders, and the messages that I save
via the pager are marked as New.
I understand the problem, but how can I fix this? The reason that it bothers
me so much is because I am using
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 09:33:49AM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Really though, this is probably something better done with a quick
shell script from the command line.
Could you elaborate on this remark? Are you suggesting working
entirely outside Mutt?
Thanks again,
Jim
Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/01/2002 (20:31) :
tsk, tsk (you should go back and read the paragraph to which you
responded)
Yes I have done it 3 times and I don't understand your point. If you
could please be more clear when you post comments it would be nice.
There were no
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:28:14PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Christian Schoepplein blurted
Is this because of the keystroke vs mouse click thing?
I've been using more and more console apps over the last few months and
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Preben Randhol wrote:
Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/01/2002 (20:31) :
tsk, tsk (you should go back and read the paragraph to which you
responded)
Yes I have done it 3 times and I don't understand your point. If you
could please be more clear when you
Adam --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:32:49AM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
% that I'm not getting the little 's' flag in the index and I don't seem
% to be able to validate the signiture in anyway.
% Check out:
% EscPcheck-traditional-pgp
Alas! Matthew D. Fuller spake thus:
I agree with that. Seems to me like the only people who would prefer
HTML mail would be the PHBs who like the pretty colors and pictures
embedded in it.
That would be The ones who spend the money, right?
Uhhh... shutup.
;)
Just because they're the
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 06:44:20AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
I presume, then, that they can't thread properly, either. Hmmm. I
wonder what mailer such contributors are using... ;-)
Not usually Mutt. :) Often the subject will be completely
off, say the ever popular, Re: blah blah Digest #58.
Alas! Benjamin Smith spake thus:
Useful for what exactly? I don't really see anything useful below that I
couldn't find out simply by looking at your orignal message.
Yes, but the same could be said for all quoted text, so why quote at
all?
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
An error?
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 11:34:36AM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
i suppose you could strip this out somehow, but i don't really see the
point personally.
1. It doesn't look right
2. If they're added as protection against weird characters, shouldn't
there be a consistent method to remove them
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Rob 'Feztaa' Park blurted
Yes, but the same could be said for all quoted text, so why quote at
all?
That's a good point!
A few people went a little 'foaming at the mouth' on this topic over tha
last few days but it all boils down
Alas! Preben Randhol spake thus:
Yes I have done it 3 times and I don't understand your point. If you
could please be more clear when you post comments it would be nice.
There were no questions in that paragraph.
The person was asking for a browser that could handle javascript. The
one you
On 2002.01.22, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a graceful way to change the Subject: lines on
a set of tagged messages? Often folks will change the
...
I tried the '|' pipe function, ;|... piping to:
sed 's/^Subject: .*$/Subject: Re: This Thread.../'
Ben --
...and then Benjamin Smith said...
%
% On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 11:34:36AM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
% i suppose you could strip this out somehow, but i don't really see the
% point personally.
%
% 1. It doesn't look right
I can understand that.
% 2. If they're added as protection
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 01:45:37PM -0700 I heard the voice of
Rob 'Feztaa' Park, and lo! it spake thus:
Just because they're the ones that spend the money, doesn't mean they
know what to spend it on!
'Course not!
That's why the helpful salesdroids send them the pretty fluffy friendly
darren chamberlain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In vim:
set titleold=My\ Old\ Xterm\ Title
and it will restore the xterm's title to that string.
Yes, but I'd like Vim to restore the XTerm title to whatever it
was before I started Vim. This might be something different each
time.
--
Sam --
...and then Samuel Padgett said...
%
% darren chamberlain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
%
% In vim:
%
%set titleold=My\ Old\ Xterm\ Title
%
% and it will restore the xterm's title to that string.
%
% Yes, but I'd like Vim to restore the XTerm title to whatever it
% was before I
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, David T-G wrote:
Sam --
...and then Samuel Padgett said...
%
% darren chamberlain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
%
% In vim:
%
%set titleold=My\ Old\ Xterm\ Title
%
% and it will restore the xterm's title to that string.
%
% Yes, but I'd like Vim to restore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote:
'ello
What kind of monster is would a message containing multipart/alternative
be? Is there somewhere that gives idiots guides to mime types?
multipart alternative messages are those which have multiple
On 11:34 23 Jan 2002, Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Benjamin Smith wrote:
| In the index this displays with the quotation marks included and this
| looks kinda weird, I'm just wondering if this is correct behaviour,
| and even if it is, what can be done about it.
|
| i'm pretty sure
I poked around in the archives and found a simple recipe for saving old messages that
could be run from a command line/script. My version of this became:
#!/bin/sh
mutt -nz -F $HOME/.mutt/mutt.archiving -f test-folder -e push 'T~d -01/01/02
;s archivetest
q'
but it isn't *quite* working. The
On 2002.01.23, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Richard G. Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#!/bin/sh
mutt -nz -F $HOME/.mutt/mutt.archiving -f test-folder -e push 'T~d -01/01/02
;s archivetest
q'
but it isn't *quite* working. The file to which the messages are
written isn't archivetest but
On 2002.01.23, in [EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Nick Wilson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 'ello
> What kind of monster is would a message containing multipart/alternative
> be? Is there somewhere that gives idiots guides to mime types?
It's a multipart type that provides multiple alternative views of
ing Mutt 1.3.25 at home on Debian Linux (unstable) and 1.3.25 here at
work (Solaris 8 x86) I noticed something a little different. On my home
version, I see an extra header called Mix: which says no chain
defined. Here at work, I don't see said header. I'm using the same
config file on both, so
On [2002-Jan-23] David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like your push sequence is just appending to the default name
already in the edit buffer. One way around this would be just to put a
kill-line as the first binding after the ;s.
That does it very nicely, thanks!
Rich
On Jan 23, Carl B. Constantine [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
ing Mutt 1.3.25 at home on Debian Linux (unstable) and 1.3.25 here at
work (Solaris 8 x86) I noticed something a little different. On my home
version, I see an extra header called Mix: which says no chain
defined. Here at work, I don't
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 03:36:52PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
I don't know about the macro you found, but it seems that either a toggle
macro (the same keystroke(s) to turn things on and off) or a macro that
it looks like this (a bit clumsy imho):
macro pager V enter-commandset
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 Francis A. Holop spewed into the ether:
hello,
the outgoing mail could be counted somehow
using mutt's capabilities and that's why
Well, as David pointed out, you could just increment a counter, but I
prefer mailstat's output, as it shows me what
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 Hanspeter Roth spewed into the ether:
Some mailinglists prefix every subject with the name of the list.
Is it possible to suppress this prefix in the index_format? How?
Or is this a case for procmail?
This works for me :
What's the easyiest way to delete message 1-2000?
On Jan 23, Jason Nealis [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
What's the easyiest way to delete message 1-2000?
D~m 1-2000
D - delete-pattern
~m 1-2000 - pattern for messages 1-2000
msg23633/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 04:30:31PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
What about just using %F instead?
Yes, that what I want, thanks. Should have read the manual.
--
Benjamin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg23634/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
35 matches
Mail list logo
