On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 10:34:20AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> I took a look and found your entire message twice, once bare and once
> apparently as an old-style pgp message. I have no idea why it would
> send two copies, but the in-line part looks interesting.
>
> Can you
>
> grep pgp .muttrc
On 17:28 25 Jan 2002, David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Off-topic meandering:
| I think it would be lovely to automatically compress all email before
| sending and have it opened on the other end, but that not only gets
| into more MIME types (I think it could be done pretty easily but haven'
On 14:09 25 Jan 2002, Michael Montagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I often read about the evils os HTML email and since I do all my email
| with mutt now, I appreciate text email. But something I don't
| understand is the argument that it slows down the internet for everyone.
| Isn't HTML just t
On 09:43 26 Jan 2002, Prahlad Vaidyanathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 Mathias Gygax spewed into the ether:
| > i'm subscribed to over 150 mailing lists and get over 1700 mails a day.
|
| Holy crap !! How do you cope ? I can't even manage the 200-250 mails I
| get everyday :-
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, David Clarke wrote:
> Don't know why but for me there isn't much of a difference between them,
> everyone else seems to be getting a big difference. I was however
I just noticed the partition I was testing on was actually ext3, which
probably explains my results.
Da
I thought NT stands for New Technology. MS is always trying to make
their customers forget about the last operating system.
Joel
> > Hr Well, as it is an NT dominated environment, anybody know
> > what NT stands for?
> >
> > No Thoughts
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 05:42:57PM -0600, Knute wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote:
>
>
> > * and then Michael Maibaum blurted
> > > My favorite was the last bi-monthly report from our (win NT
> > > dominated...) IT dept...It was a 4Mb word document for about a page and
> > > a
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 02:08:24PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> David Rock wrote:
>
> > Looks like I found what the problem was. It appears to be related to
> > the format of the Maildir folders. What I would do with mbox if I
> > didn't have an existing folder was just touch the file I needed.
>
On Jan 26, Knute [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Isn't that what logs are for?
>
> You know, to help diagnose issues such as that.
Yeah. Our group maintains/checks our logs. The others...
It's actually been hard for management to adjust to the idea that we can
tell them what happened when they a
Alas! Knute spake thus:
> By the way, why didn't they just put links to the pics instead?
> Isn't that the reason for a wan or a lan?
Give these guys a break, anybody who uses NT by choice can't be very
bright ;)
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"When the authorities warn you of the d
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Yeah... there's a little more to that... we'd just switched from a Novell
> Groupwise system to using Exchange for the group mail stuff with qmail on
> the border handling the real incoming/outgoing mail (talk about your bad
> news/good news situation
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote:
> * and then Michael Maibaum blurted
> > My favorite was the last bi-monthly report from our (win NT
> > dominated...) IT dept...It was a 4Mb word document for about a page and
> > a half, plus some high res pics, plus all the revisions in the word
> >
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Mathias Gygax thusly...
>
> i'm subscribed to over 150 mailing lists and get over 1700 mails a day.
>
> mutt performs very well, even on not so speedy computers.
i thought we were telling roman n. how good or bad is our mda,
a la procmail & mdforward, of ch
David Rock wrote:
> Looks like I found what the problem was. It appears to be related to
> the format of the Maildir folders. What I would do with mbox if I
> didn't have an existing folder was just touch the file I needed.
> Following this logic, I would create a new directory for a Maildir
> th
Looks like I found what the problem was. It appears to be related to the
format of the Maildir folders. What I would do with mbox if I didn't
have an existing folder was just touch the file I needed. Following this
logic, I would create a new directory for a Maildir that I needed. What
I *didn't*
On Jan 26, Rob 'Feztaa' Park [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Alas! Jeremy Blosser spake thus:
>
> > one of the managers actually suggested it was a flaw of qmail that it
> > didn't crash at this point, to act as a break point. :)
>
> Linux: Too stable for it's own good!
>
> That's a new one on me
Alas! Jeremy Blosser spake thus:
> one of the managers actually suggested it was a flaw of qmail that it
> didn't crash at this point, to act as a break point. :)
Linux: Too stable for it's own good!
That's a new one on me ;)
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Microsoft - because God h
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 12:28:17AM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
>
> Probably more to do with mismatched mbox-hooks or something. Hard to say
> without seeing more of your config.
Here is my full .muttrc as it looks right now (same as when I started this
thread):
# source files
source ~/.mutt/a
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 12:58:50PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> On Jan 26, Michael Maibaum [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > My favorite was the last bi-monthly report from our (win NT
> > dominated...) IT dept...It was a 4Mb word document for about a page and
> > a half, plus some high res pics, p
On Jan 25, David Ellement [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I also see this fairly often. Of course, because these folks care
> about how their message looks, they also include "stationery",
> background or border images. So I'll get a multipart/alternative
> message with one or two image attachments
On Jan 26, Michael Maibaum [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> My favorite was the last bi-monthly report from our (win NT
> dominated...) IT dept...It was a 4Mb word document for about a page and
> a half, plus some high res pics, plus all the revisions in the word
> document. It was sent to every email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Michael Maibaum blurted
> My favorite was the last bi-monthly report from our (win NT
> dominated...) IT dept...It was a 4Mb word document for about a page and
> a half, plus some high res pics, plus all the revisions in the word
> doc
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 09:17:14AM -0800, Michael Maibaum wrote:
> My favorite was the last bi-monthly report from our (win NT
> dominated...) IT dept...It was a 4Mb word document for about a page and
I'm not able to top that. (There are some instances where individuals have
sent larger attachme
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 12:05:21PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 09:52:26PM -0800, David Ellement wrote:
> > The "best" ones are from the IT department, rejoicing in their
> > latest efficiency measures...
>
> worse - the ones that have the message in plain text, along wi
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 09:52:26PM -0800, David Ellement wrote:
> The "best" ones are from the IT department, rejoicing in their
> latest efficiency measures...
worse - the ones that have the message in plain text, along with a 500kb
attachment in M$ Word repeating word-for-word the same informa
David --
...and then David Ellement said...
%
...
% background or border images. So I'll get a multipart/alternative
% message with one or two image attachments, where the text part is
% about 300 byte, the html part about 3k bytes, and the images about
% 30-100k bytes each.
%
% The "best" one
Dave --
...and then Dave Pearson said...
%
% On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 12:38:57PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% >
...
% > % WinDOS since about 1991 and the last character of the prompt hasn't been
% > % ">" for that length of time.
% >
% > I beg to differ. The old DOS prompt was just > ($g) and then
Ben --
...and then Ben Logan said...
%
% Hello,
Hi!
%
% I noticed recently that when I send a signed message, gpg says "not a
...
% I signed this message so that ya'll could see what I'm talking about.
I took a look and found your entire message twice, once bare and once
apparently as an ol
On 020124, at 08:19:44, Gary Johnson wrote
> I receive a lot of internal memos from administrative assistants
> (formerly known as secretaries) formatted as HTML. ...
>
> 3. In all fairness [donning flame suit now], HTML e-mail looks better
> to most users than does plain text. You can cha
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 05:07:02PM -0600, Kelly Scroggins wrote:
> I hate to ask this. It must be right under my
> nose.
>
> But, I've looked in the headers of this lists
> messages, I've looked on the web site too, but I
> can't find anything that tells me how to
> unsubscribe.
This informatio
Hello,
I noticed recently that when I send a signed message, gpg says "not a
detached signature". What does that mean, and should I be concerned
about it? I'm using the gpg configuration found in the sample gpg.rc
file supplied with mutt.
I signed this message so that ya'll could see what I'm
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 05:38:25PM -0500, Ron Secord wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 December 1969 06:59 pm, you wrote:
>
> >> what does your postconf -n output look like?
> > > what happens in your logs if you do:
>
> I tried the postconf -n and got:
> bash: postconf: command not found
Of course this
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 Mathias Gygax spewed into the ether:
[-- snip --]
> i'm subscribed to over 150 mailing lists and get over 1700 mails a day.
Holy crap !! How do you cope ? I can't even manage the 200-250 mails I
get everyday :-)
pv.
--
Prahlad Vaidyanathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Death has
33 matches
Mail list logo
