begin quoting what David T-G said on Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:34:59PM -0500:
ObTopic: I personally feel that X-Mailer should be available just like
every X-anything-else, but I don't care much more than that.
Any header that's defined in a standard should be controlled, but
X-Mailer is not
I applied the compressed folders patch, and it seemed to work.
mutt -v shows:
Mutt 1.3.28i (2002-03-13)
Copyright (C) 1996-2001 Michael R. Elkins and others.
Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'.
Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under
begin quoting what David Collantes said on Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 08:54:39AM -0500:
Any header that's defined in a standard should be controlled, but
X-Mailer is not defined in a standard. It shouldn't be controlled.
What standards are you talking about?
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 05:21:36AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
* James Greenwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-30 17:05]:
I have recently switched from Pine to Mutt and I have several mailboxes
that open fine in Pine but not in Mutt. Mutt seems to concatenate some
of the messages together so
On 020331, at 16:23:09, James Greenwood wrote
However the problem is still there - on the mailbox I tried,
pine still sees 102 messages and mutt sees only 3.
Any other ideas?
Perhaps formail could reformat the mailbox:
formail -d oldmbox newmbox
--
David Ellement
On 03-31-2002 at 09:11 EST, Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What standards are you talking about?
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/
:- RFC's are *not* standards. Who ever told you so?
Hope this clears up the confusion.
It was never a confusion, just a wrong statement: yours. ;-)
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 07:29:06AM -0800, David Ellement wrote:
On 020331, at 16:23:09, James Greenwood wrote
However the problem is still there - on the mailbox I tried,
pine still sees 102 messages and mutt sees only 3.
Any other ideas?
Perhaps formail could reformat the mailbox:
begin quoting what David Collantes said on Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 10:05:22AM -0500:
:- RFC's are *not* standards. Who ever told you so?
sigh
RFCs are not Standards, but they are standards.
If you don't think so, stop using MIME, because it hasn't been adopted
as a Standard yet, despite
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 05:24:20 +0200
From: Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: disable UIDL - fetchmail?
* Guilherme Menegon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-30 19:02]:
My POP3 server does not support UIDL (unique ID
listing) and because of that mutt can not fetch my
mail. How can
On 03-31-2002 at 12:24 EST, Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RFCs are not Standards, but they are standards.
sight Plonk!
College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida
Don't make me drive over there and smack you; it's only about 20 minutes
from Maitland. :-)
* Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-30 13:35:04 +0100]:
NO. It's Period. Please don't make a new OT thread out of this,
especially you David. ;-)
Well, I just did some googling and found a bunch of sites about quote
characters; none of my attempts at searching the RFCs turned up
* John Buttery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
* Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-30 13:35:04 +0100]:
NO. It's Period. Please don't make a new OT thread out of this,
especially you David. ;-)
^ The problem with using just '' is that the quote string merges with
the text and becomes
Hello Everyone,
I have been using mutt for abour 4 years now. Very happy with it I
must say. Anyways, my system adminstrator had just updated mutt to
1.3.24i (2001-11-29) and since then, everytime I send a message either
a forward, reply or even a new message, I get the following message
when I
* Thomas Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04- 1 02:52:00 +0100]:
* John Buttery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
^ The problem with using just '' is that the quote string merges with
the text and becomes difficult to disinguish, not only for users, but
for reflowing algorithms which often have to put up
Alas! John Buttery spake thus:
So, while I'm definitely interested in following the standards, there
doesn't seem to be one.
It's not a formal standard in any sense of the word standard; it's
more like a deeply rooted tradition that goes all the way back to the
early days of USENET (maybe
15 matches
Mail list logo
