On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 02:47:22PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> However to rid my private inbox of that last 5% of spam I'd like to only
> accept messages from a list of addresses...
Relatively untested, but how about:
# check whitelist. reverse the sense of the fgrep...
FROM=`formail -rtz
* On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Flavien wrote:
> I must be missing something. It does not work here... :-(
Actually, it was me who was missing something. I'm using "color
index" to match my old addresses, not "color header". So I'm
coloring the matched messages in the index, rather than coloring
the he
Hi,
John Iverson gave the following hint :
> I use ~C for this and it seems to work fine, even when the
> address isn't on the first line of the To: header. Try this:
>
> color header red black "~C myoldlogin\@myoldaddress\.com"
I must be missing something. It does not work here... :-(
I
* On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Flavien wrote:
> I have som old addresses that some people still have in their
> address-books. I'd like to spot these people by colorizing the headers
> when matching one of those addresses. It works pretty well with :
>
> color header red black 'To:.*myold
Hi,
I have created alpha version of the Python script for
synchronization of two IMAP servers (it need to be debugged and
completed, if necessary). However, I have today repented for
spending too much time with this as thing, which I am not to do.
Therefore, I have upload it to
http://www.vo
Hi,
* Flavien [04/28/02 17:36:10 CEST] wrote:
> I have som old addresses that some people still have in their
> address-books. I'd like to spot these people by colorizing the headers
> when matching one of those addresses. It works pretty well with :
> color header red black 'To:.
Hi!
Is it possible to colorize the visible messages of collapsed threads
if the threads contain one or more new messages?
-Andre
Shawn, et al --
...and then Shawn McMahon said...
%
..
% Whitelisting is horribly complicated to get right, and if you get it
Agreed.
% wrong, it's guaranteed to bounce legitimate mail.
Well, only if you also set it up to dump everything instead of retaining
the last vestige of sensibility a
* Flavien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-28 17.36 +0200]:
> Hello,
Hi.
> I have som old addresses that some people still have in their
> address-books. I'd like to spot these people by colorizing the headers
> when matching one of those addresses. It works pretty well with :
[...snip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maybe this is more of a procmail or fetchmail or spamassassin question.
> I'm running spamassassin on all mail to my private address. It catches
> 95% of all spam. I'm really quite impressed. However to rid my private
> inbox of that last 5% of spam I'd like to only acc
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 11:25:51AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
[ Snip. ]
> What's the output of ":set ?delete"? I think you have it set to
> ask-... and if there are messages to delete your macro is asked, and
> then the !isy is taken as answer to the question, and everything goes
> wrong.
>
Hello,
I have som old addresses that some people still have in their
address-books. I'd like to spot these people by colorizing the headers
when matching one of those addresses. It works pretty well with :
color header red black 'To:.*myoldlogin\@myoldaddress\.com'
However, when
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotation:
> 95% of all spam. I'm really quite impressed. However to rid my private
> inbox of that last 5% of spam I'd like to only accept messages from a
> list of addresses, maybe including mail that has made it into my inbox
> on previous occasions and addresses of peo
Hi,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04/28/02 14:47:22 CEST] wrote:
> Maybe this is more of a procmail or fetchmail or spamassassin question.
Absolutely.
> I'm running spamassassin on all mail to my private address. It catches
> 95% of all spam. I'm really quite impressed. However to rid my private
> inbox
Hi,
* David T-G [04/28/02 15:28:12 CEST] wrote:
> Volker --
> ...and then V K said...
> %
> % I have set edit_headers. Why does mutt not add a Sender: header line
> % when I add that to the headers in the editor? It works with other
> I vaguely recall this coming up before, perhaps with Sender
Volker --
...and then V K said...
%
% I have set edit_headers. Why does mutt not add a Sender: header line
% when I add that to the headers in the editor? It works with other
I vaguely recall this coming up before, perhaps with Sender: or perhaps
with User-Agent: or perhaps something else. A q
m2 --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% Maybe this is more of a procmail or fetchmail or spamassassin question.
Yep.
% I'm running spamassassin on all mail to my private address. It catches
...
% on previous occasions and addresses of people I've sent stuff to.
I'd use the SA whiteli
Maybe this is more of a procmail or fetchmail or spamassassin question.
I'm running spamassassin on all mail to my private address. It catches
95% of all spam. I'm really quite impressed. However to rid my private
inbox of that last 5% of spam I'd like to only accept messages from a
list of addres
* Shannon Prickett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-28 01:46:56 -0700]:
> I'm using the isync package from Debian [0.7-1] and mutt from Debian
> [1.3.28-2] and attempting to use the folder-hooks from
> http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~me/isync/ without success.
>
> Here are some examples that don't work for me
I'm using the isync package from Debian [0.7-1] and mutt from Debian
[1.3.28-2] and attempting to use the folder-hooks from
http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~me/isync/ without success.
Here are some examples that don't work for me:
folder-hook '!' 'macro index $ "!isync -aC\n"'
folder-hook '!' "macro inde
20 matches
Mail list logo
