Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> * Eric Blau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-17 15:17]:
> > I have the following folder-hook in my muttrc file:
> > folder-hook =INBOX 'push T~r>1m\n\;s=archive/INBOX\n'
>
> "~r" takes *no* argument and is for *all* read messages. i think
> you want to use
Saku Ytti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> >This works here, too. Sure you don't have send-hooks which set From: in
> >any way?
>
> Nope, no send-hooks. If I write new mail via 'm' I get the From and
> Cc formatted as expected by configartion above but if I reply via 'r' the Cc
> doesn't appear u
Alan --
...and then Alan Batie said...
%
% I was wondering if something can't be done to fix the interaction
In addition to what Sven has provided, note that $p_c_t requires an
additional patch up through v1.4 to really work seamlessly with Outhouse;
in the 1.5 tree that patch has been merged i
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Lee J. Moore wrote:
Oh woah is me for following up to my own followup but this is
driving me nuts. ;)
[..]
>
> Trying to
> use color8 and above, results in [sic] errors.
>
[..]
> This is despite the fact that color8 and above is available with
> slrn in the same terminal.
Hmm..
I compiled mutt with slang, and I discovered that contrary to ncurses,
the headers now had background colour to the end of the line, but
"brightblack" no longer worked. (tried with xterm, rxvt, aterm and
konsole)
I'd love it of mutt could use the standard unix rgb.txt color names and
a high
Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Michael,
> > Nope, no send-hooks. If I write new mail via 'm' I get the From and
> > Cc formatted as expected by configartion above but if I reply via 'r' the
> > Cc
> > doesn't appear unless I change it to something different than From.
> Even r
Saku Ytti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Even replying works like charm. Please test with 'mutt -F /dev/null' to be
> > sure it's not your setup.
>
> Umm, I'm puzzled. If I use the -F /dev/null how do I get the folder-hook
> readen which don't work
Greetings!
Two questions. First, when I send e-mail lately I get an error
13 - but the mail sends. Any ideas? Second, I like to keep mutts
'standard' look (plus or minus a few things), however I want to make the
background transparent in mutt. How do I go about doing that?
Kind
Greetings!
I have a problems with mutt. My procmail filter all mail and putting it from
/var/spool/mail/username to
~/mail/Inbox.
Mutt is setting up to look to ~/mail/Inbox, but when I start mutt, it says
~/mail/Inbox - not a mailbox.
Why ?
--
Best regards,
Oleg Lukashin
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Oleg Lukashin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> I have a problems with mutt. My procmail filter all mail and putting
> it from /var/spool/mail/username to ~/mail/Inbox.
> but when I start mutt, it says ~/mail/Inbox - not a mailbox. Why ?
Hard to say. Blame procmail I suppose. Does ~/mail/Inbox st
John Iverson said:
> * On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Mike Leone wrote:
>
>> I use Maildir with IMAP, and I see *no* new mail notifications
>> on the folders at all. When I open the mailbox (maildir), yes -
>> the index or pager shows new messages. But using the "c"
>> command to switch folders only ever s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Michael Leone on Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 03:42:58PM -0400:
> > Can it be set to delete spam automatically (I'm not so interested in
> > just *marking* spam, because if it only marks spam I still have to
> > sift through it), without getting too man
I use the mailcrypt library from within Emacs to clear sign a regular
text message for outlook folks. I also try and remind them when I can
about using a more standards compliant email client :->.
It has come to my attention...
...that Alan Batie said on Monday, Aug 19 2002:
> I was wondering if
Not sure about the error 13, but to keep a transparent background, use
the "default" color as the background color for everything when
setting your colors.
Just make sure not to use mutt in a white background terminal after
the change though :->.
HTH
It has come to my attention...
...that Noesi
Send-Hooks, and the Subject, revisited.
___
I have asked a similar question before, with no clear answer.
I will try to rephrase it. I hope that perhaps some developer
is reading, and can say 'this is not possible' or 'it should
be possible'. Now, the
> yes - someone ought to tell the creators or outlook about RFC2015..
It would help if they cared about interoperating...
> so i think you should upgrade. ;-)
apparently ;-)
I'm actually using check-traditional now, so I guess I'll break down
and send it also...
> In addition to what Sven ha
Hey all ;)
I have a bit of a problem --
When I send a mailing list, one copy of the message is stored in
my sent-mail mbox, and then another copy is stored in that ml's mbox
when I get it off the list again.
The problem is that I've written an mbox parsing utility (for the
purposes of reportin
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-20 16:22]:
> The problem is that I've written an mbox parsing utility (for the
> purposes of reporting statistics), and there is a huge amount of
> duplication in my own mails.
>
> So what I want to know is, is there a way to get mutt to save messa
--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! darren chamberlain spake thus:
> * Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-20 16:22]:
> > The problem is that I've written an mbox parsing utility (f
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Philip Wittamore wrote:
> Hmm..
> I compiled mutt with slang, and I discovered that contrary to
> ncurses, the headers now had background colour to the end of
> the line, but "brightblack" no longer worked. (tried with
> xterm, rxvt, aterm and konsole)
Yep, same here. Co
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:16:55PM +0100, Lee J. Moore wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Philip Wittamore wrote:
>
> > Hmm..
> > I compiled mutt with slang, and I discovered that contrary to
> > ncurses, the headers now had background colour to the end of
> > the line, but "brightblack" no longer w
Le (20/08/02 23:16), Lee J. Moore à ecrit:
> Maybe it's only a minority of Mutt users who want more than
> eight colours.
do you think that some believe that colour is too un-nerdy ?
me, I'm a brand of monkey, and colour is just as important for my mail
as it was when my great-grandaddy was pic
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Thomas Dickey wrote:
[..]
> 8 colors are standard (the majority of those 16-color
> applications are assuming that bold colors are bright - which
> is not a valid assumption in many cases).
Well, as an example, in slrn, I've got a lightgray statusbar
with white text. Easier
--Pk6IbRAofICFmK5e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Lee J. Moore spake thus:
> I've got one ugly mutt here atm. ;(
I seem to be able to get by with only 8 colors.
Although, I did implement the hack that le
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Philip Wittamore wrote:
> Le (20/08/02 23:16), Lee J. Moore à ecrit:
>
> > Maybe it's only a minority of Mutt users who want more than
> > eight colours.
>
> do you think that some believe that colour is too un-nerdy ?
Um...no! I don't care about others perceptions. If I
* Fernan Aguero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-20 16.39 -0300]:
Hi Fernan.
> Is it possible to use a send hook to set the subject?
Yes, but you must have 'unset autoedit' in your muttrc; if not set,
there isn't any data for the send-hook to work with.
HTH
--
_ Martin Karlsson
( )
\
At 16:39 -0300 20 Aug 2002, Fernan Aguero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to use a send hook to set the subject?
No. To quote the manual:
] Note: the send-hook's are only executed ONCE after getting the initial
] list of recipients. Adding a recipient after replying or editing th
* Martin Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-21 03.02 +0200]:
> Yes, but you must have 'unset autoedit' in your muttrc; if not set,
> there isn't any data for the send-hook to work with.
s/unset/set
And it doesn't work if you're replying, only when you write a new
mail. I think.
--
_
* Martin Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-21 03.19 +0200]:
> * Martin Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-21 03.02 +0200]:
>
> > Yes, but you must have 'unset autoedit' in your muttrc; if not set,
> > there isn't any data for the send-hook to work with.
>
> s/unset/set
>
> And it doesn'
* Noesis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-20 13:37]:
> First, when I send e-mail lately I get an
> error 13 - but the mail sends. Any ideas?
os, mutt version [1], setup, commands, error messages?
which MTA? changed its setup? checked the logs?
> Second, I like to keep mutts 'standard' look (plus
* Oleg Lukashin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-20 13:47]:
> I have a problems with mutt. My procmail filter all mail and
> putting it from /var/spool/mail/username to ~/mail/Inbox.
> Mutt is setting up to look to ~/mail/Inbox, but when I start
> mutt, it says ~/mail/Inbox - not a mailbox. Why ?
be
I have procmail and mutt set up so mails for lists are automatically put
in =lists/listname, and mutt recognizes every subdirectory name in that
directory as a list.
listname is the part before the @, like mutt-users for this one.
Default save for other things, people, mainly, is in =people/nam
> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:31:28 -0600
> From: "Rob 'Feztaa' Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Reducing duplication
> To: Mutt Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Alas! darren chamberlain spake thus:
> > Or skip your sent-mail folder altogether.
>
> I wanted to avoid this for portability;
33 matches
Mail list logo
