On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:04:11PM -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
> Here are the gory details. Much of my communication is not through
> mailing lists. As a rule I don't go to a folder to exchange mail with
> a particular person.
that's what I meant ... nearly nobody has one folder per person.
> I wa
is there a way to use 'subscribe' and index_format to have
the 'L' flag on a message to show it's from a list, but
instead of having the string "To " returned,
return the name of the author, as would happen if I didn't
have the list subscribed? in other words i like the L flag
in the index_fo
I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
the tags faster?
--
Eric Smith
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002, Eric Smith wrote:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
> the tags faster?
Telling people not to send email as
Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
> the tags faster?
Deleting HTML mail unread. It's /muc
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Eric Smith wrote:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
> the tags faster?
someone commented on "lynx -dump" r
* Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-24 05:59]:
> * Rob Lingelbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-23 22:21 -0700]:
> > On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > > but there was a patch which allowed to
> > > add a comment in an extra header line.
> > > maybe this can solve your problem
* David Ellement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-24 06:16]:
> I have seen the message(s) in the archives pointing out the
> manual section that states send-hook can't be used to change the
> recipient headers. What I've not seen is anyone suggesting how
> it might be accomplished without without usi
* Eric "old fruit" Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-24 13:44]:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait for
> `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html mails that
> happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip the tags faster?
well - do no
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 01:40:27PM +0200, Christian Ordig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:04:11PM -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
> > Here are the gory details. Much of my communication is not through
> > mailing lists. As a rule I don't go to a folder to exchange mail with
> > a particular person.
* Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020924 15:36]:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
> the tags faster?
Procmail
:0
*Content-type
* Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-24-02 08:54]:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
> the tags faster?
I use:
text/html; w3m -F
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:36:49PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
I have the following line in my .mailcap
text/html; unhtml ; copiousoutput
I think the unhtml website is at
http://www.econym.demon.co.uk/unhtml/
Then I view the mail as an attachment, and unhtml strips out the
tags. Seems instantan
bill luecke said:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:36:49PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
>
> I have the following line in my .mailcap
>
> text/html; unhtml ; copiousoutput
good answer - apt-get install unhtml on debian
But it is still almost a second delay.
I think i will try and kill this problem with
* Rob Lingelbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-24 13:08]:
> is there a way to use 'subscribe' and index_format to have the 'L' flag
> on a message to show it's from a list, but instead of having the string
> "To " returned, return the name of the author, as would happen if
> I didn't have the list
* Josh Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If I send someone a message, and I've got his key, Gnus doesn't
> > suggest to encrypt the message.
>
> Agreed, this would be nice...
This was about Gnus, but can mutt do this?
-Johan
--
Johan Almqvist
http://www
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Eric Smith wrote:
> bill luecke said:
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:36:49PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
> >
> > I have the following line in my .mailcap
> >
> > text/html; unhtml ; copiousoutput
>
> good answer - apt-get install unhtml on debian
>
> But it is still almost a sec
Hi all,
I'm looking for the S/MIME equivalent of the GnuPG option:
encrypt-to
Because now I'm unable to read the encrypted e-mails I have sent to
some recipients...
I was not able to find it in TFM...
Thanks,
--
René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
If you want to be worsh
Hello.
On Tue 2002-09-24 at 15:36:49 +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
> the tags faster?
Be sure to u
* On 2002.09.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Sven Dogbert Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/mutt/#-label
Should be:
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/mutt/#x-label
> yes, that's the one. however, the description does not mention
> whether it adds
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Tue 2002-09-24 at 15:36:49 +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
> > I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> > for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> > mails that happen upon my inbox - what
+[ Asi hablaba Roberto Rotta ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
|
| * Fernan Aguero [23 Sep 2002, 15:25 -0300]:
| > How do you reply to a message in a thread, change the
| > subject and start a new thread?
|
| press "m" :D
I already knew that :|
|
| > I mean, I can do all this by hand, but perhaps there
Quoting Ren? Clerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, Sep 24 19:08:
>
> I'm looking for the S/MIME equivalent of the GnuPG option:
>
> encrypt-to
As far as I could tell, it doesn't exist. This patch add that
functionality. Set $smime_encrypt_self to true and S/MIME encrypted
messages you send will a
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 05:35:43PM +0200, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> > Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > If I send someone a message, and I've got his key, Gnus doesn't
> > > suggest to encrypt the message.
> This was about Gnus, but can mutt do this?
i use this script:
gpgers.sh
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > At work I now have mutt set up to properly connect via IMAP to an Exchange
> > server. The problem is, though, that new messages always appear as old and
> > unread. This means that mutt -Z is useless. Is there some adjustment that
> > would have to
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:36:49PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
> I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
> the tags faster?
let procmail kil
On 020924, at 15:56:56, Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> * David Ellement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-24 06:16]:
> > I have seen the message(s) in the archives pointing out the
> > manual section that states send-hook can't be used to change the
> > recipient headers. What I've not seen i
Hi ppl,
I just realized that when i'm reading my mail, the Date: field is
missing...
In my index list, the date is shown, but I can't find it back in my
headers. My .muttrc file contains: hdr_order From Date: To: Subject: Cc:
Bcc:
Does anybody know what the problem could be ??
Thanks
Dick
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 01:47:06AM +0200, D. J. Bolderman wrote:
> Hi ppl,
>
> I just realized that when i'm reading my mail, the Date: field is
> missing...
> In my index list, the date is shown, but I can't find it back in my
> headers. My .muttrc file contains: hdr_order From Date: To: Subject
* On 2002.09.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "D. J. Bolderman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi ppl,
>
> I just realized that when i'm reading my mail, the Date: field is
> missing...
unignore Date:
--
-D.We establised a fine coffee. What everybody can say
Sun Project,
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Bernard Massot wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 01:47:06AM +0200, D. J. Bolderman wrote:
> > Hi ppl,
> >
> > I just realized that when i'm reading my mail, the Date: field is
> > missing...
> > In my index list, the date is shown, but I can't find it back in my
> > headers.
[This may or may not be mutt related, depending on the answer]
Recently different posters have mentioned their different ways of
organizing their email (by target, by date, etc).
I'm currently having mutt pull everything from my spool and sticking it
into =Inbox, where I have all my personal ma
Hi,
I was following the instructions at http://www.spinnaker.de/mutt/compressed/
, I'am running in FreeBSD box with mutt-4.1i, but I still got some problem:
---cut
/usr/include/stdlib.h:108: warning: ANSI C does not support `long long'
/usr/include/stdlib.h:112: warning: ANSI C does not support
* D. J. Bolderman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 24, 02 at 17:35:
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> > > At work I now have mutt set up to properly connect via IMAP to an Exchange
> > > server. The problem is, though, that new messages always appear as old and
> > > unread.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 07:51:13AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
> > for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
> > mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters
On 2002-09-24 18:35, Brett Sanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but I'd like an easy way to move entire threads or chunks of a thread
> into some other mailboxes for archiving.
I keep one big archive folder for messages that are not "active" but
that I want to save (I save pretty much everything
36 matches
Mail list logo
