On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 06:08:09PM -0700, jacob certain wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 13:14, leel...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
That's interesting; I never tried gmail. An a webinterface isn't what
I want, but it means that I really have to try sup.
You should sign up just to see what it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Saturday, July 18 at 02:12 AM, quoth lee:
select, or c =name-of-folder.
Not my experience --- afair mutt asked me for the server and for the
username and for the password every time I wanted to change to another
folder, and it didn't list
On 2009-07-17, Rocco Rutte pd...@gmx.net wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:38:52PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
I repeatedly submitted a patch that did that. It was rejected.
[I don't remember what shortcut character I made expand into
the current folder.] I eventually gave up. Hopefully
On 2009-07-18_03:39:05, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Saturday, July 18 at 02:12 AM, quoth lee:
select, or c =name-of-folder.
Not my experience --- afair mutt asked me for the server and for the
username and for the password every time I wanted to change to another
folder, and it didn't list
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:21:29AM -0600, lee wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 02:36:41PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
I guess in some general sense you are correct, but within the
context of a MUA, an attachment has a very specific and well defined
meaning, that is much more narrow than this.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 06:28:35PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Friday, July 17 at 03:58 PM, quoth lee:
Hm, somehow I've never had that problem. When reading the message, I
find out if something is attached.
You're lucky!
Yay! ;)
But every now and then, I still manage to miss an
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 03:39:05AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Saturday, July 18 at 02:12 AM, quoth lee:
Not my experience --- afair mutt asked me for the server and for the
username and for the password every time I wanted to change to another
folder, and it didn't list any folders.
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 09:15:27AM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
The thread code arranges the display based on some field/information that
correllates sub-sets of email. I don't know what it is, but if the place
where it looks to decide whether or not to include a partcular email in
a thread
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 09:20:49PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:21:29AM -0600, lee wrote:
Well, I'm not trying to mislead someone. Where is defined what an
attachment is for the context of a MUA, and who made the definition?
To the best of my knowledge, it isn't
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 03:37:32PM -0600, lee wrote:
To the best of my knowledge, it isn't defined anywhere. But that doesn't
matter.
The common understanding of an attachment is that it is a file, with a
filename,
that has been sent as a separate item from the message.
Well, then
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:51:05PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 03:37:32PM -0600, lee wrote:
To the best of my knowledge, it isn't defined anywhere. But that doesn't
matter.
The common understanding of an attachment is that it is a file, with a
filename,
that
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 09:37:04PM -0600, lee wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:51:05PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 03:37:32PM -0600, lee wrote:
To the best of my knowledge, it isn't defined anywhere. But that
doesn't matter.
The common understanding of an
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 09:37:04PM -0600, lee wrote:
I'm not sure what prescriptivist means. See Message-ID:
20090718204148.ga8...@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com,
there's an explanation why I could maintain saying that.
Sorry, you might have that. Here's the References: header
(which you
13 matches
Mail list logo
