On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 07:10:18PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
* On 10 Apr 2012, Michael Ludwig wrote:
28.06.11 14:08+0200 Alexander Muyla 21 [Firebird-net-provider] Consol
29.06.11 01:56-0700 ven ~ 6 [Firebird-net-provider] fbdata
30.06.11 19:40+ Nataniel (JIRA)
* On 11 Apr 2012, Chris Green wrote:
The advantage of this solution is that it affects only how the message
is displayed in the pager, so the people who set up the mailing list to
expect these [list tags] still get them back from you when you reply.
No mailing list I have come across
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 04:24:39AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
* On 11 Apr 2012, Chris Green wrote:
The advantage of this solution is that it affects only how the message
is displayed in the pager, so the people who set up the mailing list to
expect these [list tags] still get them
I'm using elinks to view those HTML emails. ~/.mailcap contains:
text/html; muttHtml; copiousoutput
And here's the actual command:
enconv|elinks -force-html -dump -dump-color-mode 1 -eval set
document.css.stylesheet='$HOME/etc/mail.css' /dev/stdin
The `muttHTML` command highlights
On 2012-04-10, Michael Ludwig mil...@gmx.de wrote:
Some mailing list software prepends a [tag] to every subject line of
every message. I realize people may find this practical; see this
thread for an example:
07.03.12 16:31+0100 Marco Paolone 35 Mailing list and subject prefix
07.03.12
On 2012-04-11, Chris Green c...@isbd.net wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 07:10:18PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
The advantage of this solution is that it affects only how the message
is displayed in the pager, so the people who set up the mailing list to
expect these [list tags] still get
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:01:00PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
Same here. I stipped the tags out for years and never noticed any
problem with any of the mailing lists I posted to. But, IMO,
gmane+slrn is far superior (if gmane carries the list in question).
That's because newsgroups are a
