Hei hei,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:00:41PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Agreed. However Mailman has an option that is often (ab)used.
>
> "Filter out duplicate messages to list members (if possible)"
>
> In which case if you are subscribed to the mailing list and someone
> posts to the mailin
On (13/02/13 11:15), Mark H. Wood put forth the proposition:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:17:43PM -0500, Brandon McCaig wrote:
Some mailing lists don't require a subscription so you should use
'g' to reply to those lists so even unsubscribed participants get
the messages. Other lists insist that
James Griffin wrote:
> I believe Fedora/Redhat systems have a similar way of selecting
> which package/program should be your default using an
> "alternatives-type" command. Useful for Linux users.
At the risk of drifting too far from topic, yes, Red Hat / Fedora does
have alternatives. It appear
Michael Elkins wrote:
> I prefer to save the copy with the List-Post header field rather
> than the personal copy, so I use a slightly different approach:
Agreed. However Mailman has an option that is often (ab)used.
"Filter out duplicate messages to list members (if possible)"
In which case
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:15:43AM -0500, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> Not for the first time, I find myself wishing for a Geek Code -like
> header to encode all the many mailing-list rules and preferences, so
> that UAs could give us more help in conforming to local standards.
Well, so why doesn't one c
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:17:43PM -0500, Brandon McCaig wrote:
> Some mailing lists don't require a subscription so you should use
> 'g' to reply to those lists so even unsubscribed participants get
> the messages. Other lists insist that you /don't/ reply to
> everyone and only reply to the list
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:49:01PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote:
presence of the List-Post header also helps mutt's 'L' command, IIRC?
(No need for "subscribe" in .muttrc)
Yes, that was actually the primary motivation for the recipe.
On 12.02.13 17:44, Michael Elkins wrote:
>
> I prefer to save the copy with the List-Post header field rather than the
> personal copy, so I use a slightly different approach:
>
> :0
> * ^TOmutt-\/[^@]+
> {
> # mail cc'd to the mutt-* lists but without the List-Post: header are
> dupes
>
Hi Marco!
On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Marco wrote:
> On 2013–02–12 Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> > Some time ago I posted this following in a discussion about the Debian
> > alternatives and it includes a walkthrough of how alternatives are
> > used and configured. I think it is still relevant. Perhaps it wil
On 2013–02–12 Bob Proulx wrote:
> Some time ago I posted this following in a discussion about the Debian
> alternatives and it includes a walkthrough of how alternatives are
> used and configured. I think it is still relevant. Perhaps it will
> help others understand how the alternatives work.
>
- Ed [2013-02-12 15:39:33 -0500] - :
> I have this in my mailcap to view images
>
> image/*; /usr/bin/gpicview '%s'; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"
>
> but when I open a message with an image attached mutt tells me there
> is no entry in mailcap, but if I go on to using "v" then the image is
>
- Bob Proulx [2013-02-12 18:16:11 -0700] - :
> Luis Mochan wrote:
> > my system, /usr/bin/mutt is a link pointing to
> > /etc/alternatives/mutt. Furthermore, /etc/alternatives/mutt is a link
> > pointing to /usr/bin/mutt-patched, which is the actual binary for the
> > ...nice description
12 matches
Mail list logo
