Re: mutt and mh/procmail

2000-03-05 Thread Phil Staub
re I use and learn about this progrma, the more I like it! What trn > is to news, mutt is to mail. :-) > > Thanks again, everyone. > > -- > Conrad Sabatier > http://members.home.net/conrads/ > ICQ# 1147270 -- Phil Staub, KE7HC

Re: Introduction to Maildir (was Re: mutt and mh/procmail)

2000-03-02 Thread Phil Staub
e shell) how would this be incorporated into a procmail recipe? Would you literally put this in the .procmailrc file, or write a shell script and invoke it from .procmailrc? Thanks, Phil -- Phil Staub Dragonfly Software Consulting Company. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mutt and mh/procmail

2000-03-01 Thread Phil Staub
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 07:06:42PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2000-03-01 09:49:23 -0800, Phil Staub wrote: > > > I wouldn't call my reasons "grave", but I do have a certain > > amount of preference for MH folders. > > Let me put my question lik

Re: mutt and mh/procmail

2000-03-01 Thread Phil Staub
for converting > legacy mh-style folders to something else, but I wouldn't use it in > production for incoming folders. If there aren't any grave reasons > why you have to stick with mh folders, I'd suggest you switch to > maildir. > > -- > http://www.guug.d

Re: mutt and mh/procmail

2000-02-29 Thread Phil Staub
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 09:27:11PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: > > On 28-Feb-00 Phil Staub wrote: > > I would like to open a dialogue with anyone who is using mutt in > > conjunction with procmail and mh-style mailboxes. I've got some > > configuration questions. &

mutt and mh/procmail

2000-02-28 Thread Phil Staub
I would like to open a dialogue with anyone who is using mutt in conjunction with procmail and mh-style mailboxes. I've got some configuration questions. Thanks, Phil -- Phil Staub Dragonfly Software Consulting Company. [EMAIL PROT