On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 10:26:09AM -0800, Drew Bloechl wrote:
> OS: Debian woody (Linux 2.2.13, i386)
> mutt 1.1.5
> MTA is Postfix 19991231.
> Delivering to mailboxes with Procmail using locking rules.
> FS is ext2.
Duh. I didn't know I had to specify them with "mailboxes". I feel
stupi
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:11:16PM +0200, Mikko H?nninen wrote:
> David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2000:
> > Can anyone come up with an explanation for this? I can't.
>
> Me either. Sounds like it was time for some debugging...
> Well, I suppose, I should first see if I c
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 13 Mar 2000:
> Can anyone come up with an explanation for this? I can't.
Me either. Sounds like it was time for some debugging...
Well, I suppose, I should first see if I can reproduce the problem on
my system. If I have free time later today I
Drew Bloechl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> $ ls -l Mail/livid-dev ; ls -lu Mail/livid-dev
> -rw---1 drew drew 3219213 Mar 10 02:23 Mail/livid-dev
> -rw---1 drew drew 3219213 Mar 8 12:05 Mail/livid-dev
>
> This particular folder has an mtime greater than its at
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 09:10:46PM +0200, Mikko H?nninen wrote:
> Are these folders where there is new mail but which aren't shown with
> newly created with new mail, ie. they didn't exist before new mail was
> added to them by whatever delivery program? I remember once finding
> that that new ma
Drew Bloechl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2000:
> This particular folder has an mtime greater than its atime, but mutt
... I'm at a loss to explain that, but...
> doesn't seem to realize that with or without BUFFY_SIZE.
If you use BUFFY_SIZE, it makes Mutt ignore the access/modific
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 01:17:12PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> If the folder was modified at a later time than it was accessed, the
> folder is assumed to have new mail in it. Try this yourself on some
> folders that have had new mail delivered to them, and see if you can
> figure out why they
Drew Bloechl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, in the index there are messages marked as new. That part of it
> has always worked.
When reading the folder, Mutt can tell which messages are new, by
reading the Status: headers. However, that's only done when opening a
folder; when you just wan
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2000:
> that that new mail recognition didn't work unless I set $keep_empty,
... that should, of course, be $save_empty, not $keep_empty.
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Cor
Drew Bloechl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2000:
> Well, I'd prefer not to. I'd rather keep mbox format with no "N" in
> the browser than have to switch over to Maildir.
Well, I meant only for testing, trying out to see that you can get the
N displayed at all.
Are these folders wh
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 07:53:48PM +0200, Mikko H?nninen wrote:
> A couple of other things to check that I can think of:
>
> 1) When you enter these folders which are supposed to have new mail,
> does Mutt actually show any messages as new? Is it just the file
> browser or also the folder index
Drew Bloechl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 10 Mar 2000:
> I have a few things checking for mail. I did recompile with
> --enable-buffy-size and verified that it was in there with mutt -v,
> but that %N is still blank.
A couple of other things to check that I can think of:
1) When you ent
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 11:26:49PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Is your shell, perhaps, checking for new mail as well? Anything
> that accesses the folder, as I recall, will reset the new function.
> Thus, --enable-buffy-size might just be the ticket after all.
I have a few things checking for mail
Drew --
...and then Drew Bloechl said...
% On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 12:08:42AM +0200, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
% > Drew Bloechl wrote:
% > :
% > : However, the space with the %N is always blank when I do 'c' and '?'
% > : to browse mailboxes. Is there something special I have to do to get
% >
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 12:08:42AM +0200, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
> Drew Bloechl wrote:
> : In my .muttrc I have:
> :
> : set folder_format="%3C %N %-32.32f %-16.16d %s"
> :
> : However, the space with the %N is always blank when I do 'c' and '?'
> : to browse mailboxes. Is there something sp
Drew Bloechl wrote:
: In my .muttrc I have:
:
: set folder_format="%3C %N %-32.32f %-16.16d %s"
:
: However, the space with the %N is always blank when I do 'c' and '?'
: to browse mailboxes. Is there something special I have to do to get
: this to work? FWIW I'm delivering mail into these f
In my .muttrc I have:
set folder_format="%3C %N %-32.32f %-16.16d %s"
However, the space with the %N is always blank when I do 'c' and '?'
to browse mailboxes. Is there something special I have to do to get
this to work? FWIW I'm delivering mail into these folders with
procmail.
--
Drew
17 matches
Mail list logo
