what am I doing wrong?
I have the following set:
set alternates =
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|dboger@.*.bgu.ac.il
set reverse_name
and yet, when I get mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and try to reply to it, the reply
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 08:16:15PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Are you using "my_hdr From", perhaps? "my_hdr From" is incompatible
(sort of) with $reverse_name.
sure enough, that was it. Once I changed from
send-hook . 'my_hdr From...'
to
send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From'
it works :)
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 01:01:41PM -0400, Dan Boger wrote:
set alternates =
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|dboger@.*.bgu.ac.il
Just a note on your alternates regex... its rather wordy. Try:
set alternates =
&quo
Hello everyone,
This is a really simple one...
I know that $alternates is a regex, but I don't really know that much about
regular expressions... :-)
I thought that
set alternates= '((address1|address2|address3)@isp.com)'
was correct, but I must be wrong since some times when I am
, similar to alternates?
for example, mail can come from:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
i want all these addresses to resolve to "akram".
thanks in advance,
baurjan.
address. is there a way to list them in a single
place, similar to alternates?
You can't do this, without setting up aliases for all of them.
Hmm, I don't know if $reverse_alias works with alias entries that
are composed by having multiple addresses in there, probably not.
Regards,
Mikko
On 1999-12-10 10:28:07 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
It would be fairly easy to bloat up mutt_invoke_sendmail (in
sendlib.c) a bit - depending on a suitable option (say,
set_envelope_from), mutt could just pass "-faddress" to sendmail.
Note that at least sendmail and the sendmail emulation
On 1999-12-10 03:44:03 +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Sounds like something that could be done with a wrapper script,
invoked instead of the real sendmail command to first parse the
email, set the environment variable, and then call sendmail.
It would be fairly easy to bloat up
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 10 Dec 1999:
mutt could just pass "-faddress" to sendmail.
Note that at least sendmail and the sendmail emulation of postfix
can handle this.
I was trying to see if qmail's sendmail emulation script does, I think
so, but wasn't able to confirm
On Fri, 10 Dec 1999, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 10 Dec 1999:
mutt could just pass "-faddress" to sendmail.
Note that at least sendmail and the sendmail emulation of postfix
can handle this.
I second that. And the -f address option is
I was trying to see if qmail's sendmail emulation script does, I think
so, but wasn't able to confirm it in documentation. (Yes, I know,
should be easy enough to test.)
Yes, not only does qmail's sendmail emulation work just fine, you can
actually set your sendmail variable to qmail-inject
Mike Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 09 Dec 1999:
Would it be possible to arrange for the contents of the from: header in sent
mail to be exported to the sendmail command, maybe as an environment
variable? I'd like to have my envelope-sender mirror the address I use in my
from: line,
it basically has my $alternates setting hard coded
into it.
--
Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.execpc.com/~aarons/
If you want to program in C, program in C. It's a nice language. I
use it occasionally... :-)
--Larry Wall
#!/usr/bin/perl
$debug = 0;
$sendmail = '/usr/sbin
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Alternates, regex problem
User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.1i
Organization: gzp.org.hu Budapest, HU
Hi, I try setup a regex for address:
"Gabor Z. Papp" "Gabor=20Z.=20Papp"@f37.n37.z2.fidonet.org
Sendmail handle it as "Gabor=20Z.=20Papp" an alias
Hi David!
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, David DeSimone wrote:
Sean Rima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My mail filter detects spam, but instead of deleting it, it inserts
the header 'X-Status: D'.
Any chance of seeing your filter, sounds good.
Alas, my current mail filter is a home-brewed perl
Hi Rejo!
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, Rejo Zenger wrote:
++ 11/11/99 22:11 + - Sean Rima:
My mail filter detects spam, but instead of deleting it, it inserts the
header 'X-Status: D'. Thus, when I enter my mailbox, all the spam is
Any chance of seeing your filter, sounds good.
I have
On 1999-11-12 08:16:58 +0100, Rejo Zenger wrote:
Some of them are derived from the Spamdunk filters, but have been
changed and extended over the course of time. See my procmailrc at
http://www.mediaport.org/~sister/personal/procmailrc for more info.
Looks quite interesting. Please donate it
Nathan Cullen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why (rhetorical question) can't I do it with alternates?
alternates dre@chronic\.net
alternates snoop@lbc\.ca.us
Actually, it used to be that way, but that was before Mutt really
supported regular expressions. Once the regexp ability was added
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 01:04:55PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
:Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: Wishlist?
:
:No disrespect intended, Sven, but do people read your wish list?
I just did. It took a while to find it, and it's actually located under
Sven's home page and not the Mutt home
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 01:04:55PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
Why (rhetorical question) can't I do it with alternates?
alternates dre@chronic\.net
alternates snoop@lbc\.ca.us
Actually, it used to be that way, but that was before Mutt really
supported regular expressions. Once
Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 11 Nov 1999:
Btw, mutt would be a LOT more useful for many people
if there was an additional flag for your work addresses.
Example: set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Work mails" would then show up with a 'W'
and would be selectable with "~W".
What's
hackers, and try to make a "clever" regexp,
it's probably going to be hard to read. But there's no reason you can't
just make a "simple" regexp that does the same thing.
For instance, instead of this:
set alternates='^(fox|david|cretin)@(convex|hp).com)$"
I cou
David DeSimone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 11 Nov 1999:
I could just do this:
set
alternates='^([EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED])$"
BTW, aren't the .'s in the regexp supposed to be escaped, if you want
t 1.1.1i: /var/mail/guckes (threads) [004/1374] [N=300,*=0,post=31,new=1]
1368 N +! 99 Gerhard Buergmann ( 13) BVI 1.2.0 und deine VI-Clone Seite
1369 N L 99 Sven Guckes ( 50) Alternates, Groups, Lists, and Work
1370 N G 99 Mike Orr ( 40) Duplicate messages, unreadable
* Mikko Hänninen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [99 18:39]:
set alternates='^([EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED])$"
BTW, aren't the .'s in the regexp supposed to be escaped, if you want
them to match just a dot? Admittedly in most cases it doesn't make much
difference in the $alternates se
Hi David!
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, David DeSimone wrote:
In the end I want that the 'X' flag actually shows possible spams; and
work related mails are usually not spam. ;-)
My mail filter detects spam, but instead of deleting it, it inserts the
header 'X-Status: D'. Thus, when I enter my
Sean Rima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My mail filter detects spam, but instead of deleting it, it inserts
the header 'X-Status: D'.
Any chance of seeing your filter, sounds good.
Alas, my current mail filter is a home-brewed perl script, which is easy
for me to tweak and modify, since I
e with "~W".
Then you can easily focus on your work stuff
looking at new work mails with command ",W":
macro index ,W "l~N ~W\n"
One more for the wishlist, I guess.
It isn't necessary because you can put your work alternates
directly into your macros:
macro
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 07:52:14PM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote:
And then I'd like to be able to have mutt show
"/var/mail/guckes" as eg "MAILBOX" - much shorter.
I don't know about "MAILBOX", but I wouldn't mind seeing it replaced
with the "!" shortcut.
--
==
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 11:33:29AM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
Well, if you do like many hackers, and try to make a "clever" regexp,
it's probably going to be hard to read. But there's no reason you can't
just make a "simple" regexp that does the same thing.
s
++ 11/11/99 22:11 + - Sean Rima:
My mail filter detects spam, but instead of deleting it, it inserts the
header 'X-Status: D'. Thus, when I enter my mailbox, all the spam is
Any chance of seeing your filter, sounds good.
I have same kind of setup. I have procmail check for a some things
Nathan Cullen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 10 Nov 1999:
My question is, can I have multiple "alternates" (one for each email
address), or do I have to bunch them all in to one big regex?
You bunch them all in one big regex. It looks slightly ugly but
fortunately it doesn't need t
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 05:55:08PM -0500, Nathan Cullen thus spoke:
I am trying to figure out the syntax of the "alternates" option. The
mutt manual says "A regexp that allows you to specify alternate
addresses where you receive email".
My question is, can I have multip
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 05:51:19AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen thus spoke:
Nathan Cullen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 10 Nov 1999:
My question is, can I have multiple "alternates" (one for each email
address), or do I have to bunch them all in to one big regex?
You bunch them all
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 20:00 -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to use this, and have
no place where there is an example.
set alternates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
alternates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
etc.. and it doesn't work.
set alternates=me@there|[EMAIL
:
I'm trying to figure out how to use this, and have
no place where there is an example.
set alternates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
alternates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
etc.. and it doesn't work.
set alternates=me@there|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|(a|b|c)@host.com
-Marco
--
Jared Mauch | pgp
101 - 136 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
