On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 11:30:57AM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 03:53:44PM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
>
> > With an attitude like that it's not surprising that you're confused
> > about what I've been saying. Read what I've actually said, look for the
> > reasonable reas
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 03:53:44PM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 04:16:25PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
>
> > Dave, you may stop reading. The rest will only bother you and further
> > waste your time.
>
> With an attitude like that it's not surprising that you're confuse
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 01:56:23PM -0800, David T-G wrote:
> Daniel --
>
> ...and then Daniel Freedman said...
> %
> % My mutt is now at 1.0.1i, and I'll try to convince the sysadmin to
> % upgrade to 1.25. Could this version difference affect my not seeing
>
> Well, you could always grab the
Daniel --
...and then Daniel Freedman said...
%
% My mutt is now at 1.0.1i, and I'll try to convince the sysadmin to
% upgrade to 1.25. Could this version difference affect my not seeing
Well, you could always grab the source and build it yourself; the only
special program is mutt_dotlock, and
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 04:16:25PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
> Dave, you may stop reading. The rest will only bother you and further
> waste your time.
With an attitude like that it's not surprising that you're confused about
what I've been saying. Read what I've actually said, look for the
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 01:10:46PM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 01:34:03PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 08:07:58PM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
> [...]
> > it's not only me who wants mutt to behave that way, i guess. if it was not
> > the inten
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 01:34:03PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 08:07:58PM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
>
> > It would appear that we have different definitions of "accessed" and
> > "modified". My copy of mutt shows me when an mbox has been modified, not
> > when it has
first for the important part:
while reading the source to find a place to put Brandon Long's "folder
count" patch. i've found a configure switch named "--enable-buffy-size"
that seems to solve the detection issue. i only browsed through the
source since it was quite late, but it seems to read
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:37:09AM +0100, Axel Bichler wrote:
> Hi Dave!
>
> > that's more constructive than a self-confessed "uppish tone". It would
> > seem you've decided to do that so I don't really see a problem or a need
> > for such a tone.
>
> On the other hand, meticulously insisting on
Hi Dave!
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Dave Pearson wrote:
>
> Obviously the best method of dealing with this is to implement a solution,
Ack. But before reinventing something, it seems always
advisible to check if there's alreay a solution. Finally,
this can be accomplished by a discussing the problem
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 06:57:38PM +0100, Axel Bichler wrote:
> No, not necessarily. Mutt could save the filesizes. If the size has
> changed, new mail has arrived. Counting new mails could be pretty fast, if
> the program would skip the known part (old size) of the mbox file and
> parse the file
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001, Dave Pearson wrote:
> Yes it does.
>
> > to quote the docs:
> > ---
> > Note: new mail is detected by comparing the last modification time to
> > the last access time. Utilities like biff or frm or any other program
> > which accesses the mailbox might cause Mutt to
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 06:44:54PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 03:59:22PM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
>
> > Please don't suggest that I'm defending a weakness, I'm not. I am
> > pointing out that it does what it says in the documentation. It points
> > out it's own weakn
Hi Dirk!
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Dirk Ruediger wrote:
> > Mail/mutt-users [Msgs:413 New:18 1.1M]
> > Mail/sf/vuln-dev [Msgs:141478K]
> > Mail/nymip [Msgs:54 368K]
> >
> > now wouldn't that be nice ?
>
> This implies that mutt scans all folders with new mail (at
Hi Heinrich!
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Heinrich Langos wrote:
> how about this ?
>
> Mail/mutt-users [Msgs:413 New:18 1.1M]
> Mail/sf/vuln-dev [Msgs:141478K]
> Mail/nymip [Msgs:54 368K]
>
> now wouldn't that be nice ?
There's a patch available on Brandon Long's
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 03:59:22PM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 05:40:03PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 12:05:01PM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 12:24:40PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
> > >
> > > > the problem with "
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 05:40:03PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 12:05:01PM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 12:24:40PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
> >
> > > the problem with "-y" is that it simply doesn't work reliably.
> >
> > Yes it does.
>
>
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 04:23:53PM +0100, Martin Schweizer wrote:
> Hello Heinrich
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 12:24:40PM +0100 Heinrich Langos wrote:
> > > > One thing that I think would help not only me, but tons of others is
> > > > something like this:
> > > >
> > > > mailbox 1 3 n
Hello Heinrich
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 12:24:40PM +0100 Heinrich Langos wrote:
> > > One thing that I think would help not only me, but tons of others is
> > > something like this:
> > >
> > > mailbox 1 3 new messages
> > > mailbox 2 12 new messages
> > > mailbox 3 8
Hi!
Ok, the attached script is waht I use... I use it everyday, but you
probably need to change stuff to make it work.
*It only works with Maildir folders* and it has a four or five commands
(all undocumented :)
commands are:
new (show only folders with new messages)
all (show all
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 12:05:01PM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 12:24:40PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 09:27:53AM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 09:01:42PM -0800, Trae McCombs wrote:
> > >
> > > > mailbox 1
Hello Heinrich!
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Heinrich Langos wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 09:27:53AM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 09:01:42PM -0800, Trae McCombs wrote:
> >
> > > One thing that I think would help not only me, but tons of others is
> > > something like this:
Hi Heinrich,
> > > One thing that I think would help not only me, but tons of others is
> > > something like this:
> > >
> > > mailbox 1 3 new messages
> > > mailbox 2 12 new messages
> > > mailbox 3 8 new messages
>
> how about this ?
>
> Mail/mutt-users [Msgs:4
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 12:24:40PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 09:27:53AM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 09:01:42PM -0800, Trae McCombs wrote:
> >
> > > mailbox 1 3 new messages
> > > mailbox 2 12 new messages
> > > mailbox 3
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 09:27:53AM +, Dave Pearson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 09:01:42PM -0800, Trae McCombs wrote:
>
> > One thing that I think would help not only me, but tons of others is
> > something like this:
> >
> > mailbox 1 3 new messages
> > mailbox 2 12 n
I also wanted to use my arrow keys to navigate through folders.
(like I did in pine.) what I have now is:
macro index "?"
this binds the key to get you to the change-folder menu, f you are in
the message index. (I think you need the mailboxes command to tell mutt which
folders you have)
also
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 09:01:42PM -0800, Trae McCombs wrote:
> One thing that I think would help not only me, but tons of others is
> something like this:
>
> mailbox 1 3 new messages
> mailbox 2 12 new messages
> mailbox 3 8 new messages
>
>
> Where you had the "
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 09:01:42PM -0800, Trae McCombs wrote:
> I have procmail setup, and that's great, but I hate having to change into
> the mailboxes to see if there is anything new in those mailboxes.
Maybe I'm not understanding your question, but how about just
c
That lists your mail
Hey gang,
Sorry to bug *. I have a question that has long plagued me with using
Mutt. I've always had to have everything come to one mailbox, and then
simply leave everything in one huge archive.
I have procmail setup, and that's great, but I hate having to change into
the mailboxes to see if
29 matches
Mail list logo
