Re: Handling old style PGP messages (non-MIME)

2000-01-02 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
Matthias Teege schrieb am Sonntag, den 02. Januar 2000: > what about '| pgp | less' (or '| gpg | less'). This has many disadvantages: - It shows only the signed/encrypted PGP part, not the rest of the message. - You cannot reply to such an encrypted message. - "less" doesn't support colors lik

Re: Handling old style PGP messages (non-MIME)

2000-01-02 Thread Matthias Teege
Moin, what about '| pgp | less' (or '| gpg | less'). Matthias On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 07:53:05PM +0100, Roland Rosenfeld wrote: > On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Shannon Lee wrote: > > > J> > Open your eyes, there are normal users out there, which don't > > J> > want or aren't allowed/able to use procmai

Re: Handling old style PGP messages (non-MIME)

1999-12-31 Thread David Champion
On 1999.12.31, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Shannon Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > nobody here can help those organizations or individuals who have chosen to > limit themselves to "easy" software; all we can do is make sure that when > they step into the light there's a sane alternative ;

Re: Handling old style PGP messages (non-MIME)

1999-12-31 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Shannon Lee wrote: > J> > Open your eyes, there are normal users out there, which don't > J> > want or aren't allowed/able to use procmail and which > J> > communicate with Windows > nobody here can help those organizations or individuals who have > chosen to limit themselve

Re: Handling old style PGP messages (non-MIME)

1999-12-31 Thread Shannon Lee
on Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 07:37:44AM -0600, J = "Jeremy Blosser" asserted: J> Roland Rosenfeld [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: J> > Open your eyes, there are normal users out there, which don't want or J> > aren't allowed/able to use procmail and which communicate with Windows nobody here can help tho

Re: Handling old style PGP messages (non-MIME)

1999-12-31 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Roland Rosenfeld [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Thomas Roessler wrote: > > No, thanks. _This_ can really be done at delivery time by procmail. > > Do you really want Mutt to be a geek only mail reader? I do. > Open your eyes, there are normal users out there, which don't wan

Re: Handling old style PGP messages (non-MIME)

1999-12-31 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 1999-12-31 00:27:44 -0800, Michael Elkins wrote: > > > If someone wanted to do this, what I would suggest is making an > > user controlled option to search text/plain messages for the > > magic string "-BEGIN PGP". > > I suggest the variable

Re: Handling old style PGP messages (non-MIME)

1999-12-31 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-12-31 00:27:44 -0800, Michael Elkins wrote: > If someone wanted to do this, what I would suggest is making an > user controlled option to search text/plain messages for the > magic string "-BEGIN PGP". > I suggest the variable > set i_really_want_to_slow_down_reading_my_mailbox

Re: Handling old style PGP messages (non-MIME)

1999-12-31 Thread Michael Elkins
On Thu, Dec 30, 1999 at 03:17:03AM -0800, Christopher Smith wrote: > Given what would appear to be the relative simplicity of adding this > feature, I'm wondering if anyone can think of a reason why it > shouldn't be there? Previously, we were pretty strict in stating that we would not add featur

Handling old style PGP messages (non-MIME)

1999-12-30 Thread Christopher Smith
Ok. I've read all the FAQ's on this topic, but I still feel like Mutt needs better support for handling old-style PGP messages. What I'd like to see is being able to setup a macro which will decode the message just like PGP/MIME was being used properly. Since it requires user intervention on a pe