On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:38:16PM +0200, mjsseppl-m...@yahoo.de wrote:
> On 10.09.20, mjsseppl-m...@yahoo.de wrote:
> > On 10.09.20, Yue Wu wrote:
>
> > Do "H" and look at the headers and you'll see under References:
> > <20100919012315.gc36...@fbsd.t60.cpu> <20100919071840.ga26...@murdoc>
> >
* On 20 Sep 2010, Marco Giusti wrote:
>
> I got another idea that uses mutt's thread capability. I test it but i
> didn't create a macro (because I'm lazy) and I leave it to you as exercise.
I have used this technique before. It works well.
> Uncollapse all threads (Esc+V), tag all messages (
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:29:37PM +0200, Marco Giusti wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:36:02PM +0800, Yue Wu wrote:
> [...]
> > P.S., how does mutt dertermine threads? Maybe it's better and more
> > reliable than the ~s Re: way?
>
> I got another idea that uses mutt's thread capability. I test
On 10.09.20, mjsseppl-m...@yahoo.de wrote:
> On 10.09.20, Yue Wu wrote:
> Do "H" and look at the headers and you'll see under References:
> <20100919012315.gc36...@fbsd.t60.cpu> <20100919071840.ga26...@murdoc>
> etc.
>
"In-Reply-To:" is also used.
Kind regards
Michael
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:36:02PM +0800, Yue Wu wrote:
[...]
> P.S., how does mutt dertermine threads? Maybe it's better and more
> reliable than the ~s Re: way?
I got another idea that uses mutt's thread capability. I test it but i
didn't create a macro (because I'm lazy) and I leave it to you a
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:02:06PM +0200, mjsseppl-m...@yahoo.de wrote:
> On 10.09.20, Yue Wu wrote:
> > P.S., how does mutt dertermine threads? Maybe it's better and more
> > reliable than the ~s Re: way?
>
> For correct threads, i.e. if the user hasn't chosen to use just the
> subject line, it u
On 10.09.20, Yue Wu wrote:
> P.S., how does mutt dertermine threads? Maybe it's better and more
> reliable than the ~s Re: way?
For correct threads, i.e. if the user hasn't chosen to use just the
subject line, it uses "References:" which refer to the message-id of the
mail(s) to which it is respon
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:18:40AM +0200, Marco Giusti wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:23:15AM +0800, Yue Wu wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > As title, I want to keep all of the topics, but delete all of the
> > others.
>
> You can tag/search/delete responses using an heuristic expression, the
> s
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:23:15AM +0800, Yue Wu wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> As title, I want to keep all of the topics, but delete all of the
> others.
You can tag/search/delete responses using an heuristic expression, the
simpler comes in my mind:
~s Re:
If the emails are not too much, tag
Hi list,
As title, I want to keep all of the topics, but delete all of the
others.
--
Regards,
Yue Wu
Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicines
Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine
China Pharmaceutical University
No.24, Tongjia Xiang Street, Nanjing 210009, China
10 matches
Mail list logo