RunningX test

1999-04-23 Thread kiss the sun and walk on air
The documentation for MIME references a script called RunningX for use with the test parameter in the .mailcap file. Where may one find this? -pete -- (peter.royal|osi)@pobox.com - http://pobox.com/~osi "god invented turn signals for a reason" uin#153025

Re: RunningX test

1999-04-23 Thread David Shaw
On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 01:30:50PM -0400, kiss the sun and walk on air wrote: > The documentation for MIME references a script called RunningX for use > with the test parameter in the .mailcap file. Where may one find this? http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/mutt/autoview/RunningX.c I suppose

Re: RunningX test

1999-04-23 Thread Tim Walberg
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=96YOpH+ONegL0A3E; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: RunningX test

1999-04-23 Thread Stefan `Sec` Zehl
On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 01:47:02PM -0400, David Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 01:30:50PM -0400, kiss the sun and walk on air wrote: > > The documentation for MIME references a script called RunningX for use > > with the test parameter in the .mailcap file. Where may one find this? > > htt

Re: RunningX test

1999-04-23 Thread Michael Sanders
On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 01:47:02PM -0400, David Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 01:30:50PM -0400, kiss the sun and walk on air wrote: > > The documentation for MIME references a script called RunningX for use > > with the test parameter in the .mailcap file. Where may one find this? > > htt

Re: RunningX test

1999-04-23 Thread Brandon Long
On 04/23/99 Michael Sanders uttered the following other thing: > On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 01:47:02PM -0400, David Shaw wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 01:30:50PM -0400, kiss the sun and walk on air wrote: > > > The documentation for MIME references a script called RunningX for use > > > with the

Anyone has a good mailcap RunningX test?

2000-08-03 Thread Jan Houtsma
Hi! from my mailcap: text/html; netscape %s; test=RunningX text/html; lynx %s text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput Where can i find a decent RunningX script? What i want is to run netscape only when i run mutt locally on my pc at home within the window manager. However when i

Re: Anyone has a good mailcap RunningX test?

2000-08-03 Thread Gary Johnson
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 12:00:32PM +0200, Jan Houtsma wrote: > Where can i find a decent RunningX script? > > What i want is to run netscape only when i run mutt locally on my pc at home > within the window manager. However when i am at work and telnet to my house > and start mutt from there i d

Re: Anyone has a good mailcap RunningX test?

2000-08-03 Thread Jan Houtsma
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 11:20:07AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 12:00:32PM +0200, Jan Houtsma wrote: > > > Where can i find a decent RunningX script? > > > > What i want is to run netscape only when i run mutt locally on my pc at home > > within the window manager. Howeve

Re: Anyone has a good mailcap RunningX test?

2000-08-03 Thread Jan Houtsma
Never mind my stupid question. I just found a line DISPLAY=:0.0 in my /etc/zshenv file which always (so also at a telnet session) sets the DISPLAY variable, which caused netscape to start instead of lynx or w3m when, from mutt, i visited an url in a telnet window. I appologize and close this thr

[OT] Re: Anyone has a good mailcap RunningX test?

2000-08-03 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Jan Houtsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 03 Aug 2000: > Only thing that works is manually unsetting $DISPLAY. Having $DISPLAY defined usually means that there's an X session running. Why do you have it defined anyway (in that telnet session) if you're not doing stuff from inside an X environ

Re: [OT] Re: Anyone has a good mailcap RunningX test?

2000-08-04 Thread Jan Houtsma
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 12:42:59AM +0300, Mikko H?nninen wrote: > Jan Houtsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 03 Aug 2000: > > Only thing that works is manually unsetting $DISPLAY. > > Having $DISPLAY defined usually means that there's an X session running. > Why do you have it defined anyway (