Sending eMail ...

Hello everyone, I've got a question/suggestion about sending mails. I love mutt and have used it for years and always came back to it from other mostly GUI-clients like Outlook and Thunderbird. ;) There is just one thing that is annoying me, sending mails .. When I hit the button for a new mail,

Re: Sending eMail ...

* Marcus Franke [2011-07-06 09:39]: > When I hit the button for a new mail, mutt drops into the background > and a new vi(m) session is opened I can type my mail in. Maybe not what you're after, but I'm running multiple mutt sessions. One for the inbox, one for the sent folder, and similar for o

Re: Sending eMail ...

On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 09:46:34AM +0200, Vegard Svanberg wrote: > What I would like to see is an attachment-reminder. Like if I'd > mentioned "please see the attachment" or another text string in the > e-mail, I'd like Mutt to prompt if I should add an attachment. Like > Thunderbird and Evolution

Re: Sending eMail ...

On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:17:25AM -0500, Claude Rubinson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 09:46:34AM +0200, Vegard Svanberg wrote: > > What I would like to see is an attachment-reminder. Like if I'd > > mentioned "please see the attachment" or another text string in the > > e-mail, I'd like Mutt t

Re: Sending eMail ...

Claude Rubinson [06.Jul.2011 10:17]: On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 09:46:34AM +0200, Vegard Svanberg wrote: What I would like to see is an attachment-reminder. Like if I'd mentioned "please see the attachment" or another text string in the e-mail, I'd like Mutt to prompt if I should add an attachment

sending email to txt

To piggyback off the current thread, anyone know how I could from my email client, mutt, et al, send a simple email and send as text to an at&t cell phone? I have tried sending to 'num...@txt.att.net' and it just bounces back, without delivery. Please advise! Scott

Re: sending email to txt

On Aug 01, 2010 at 09:56 PM -0600, Scott Jones wrote: I have tried sending to 'num...@txt.att.net' and it just bounces back, without delivery. I think num...@mms.att.net works.

Re: sending email to txt

On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Tim Gray wrote: > On Aug 01, 2010 at 09:56 PM -0600, Scott Jones wrote: >> >> I have tried sending to 'num...@txt.att.net' and it just bounces back, >> without delivery. > > I think num...@mms.att.net works. > Thanks Tim. That worked, but I received my test text a

Re: sending email to txt

On Aug 01, 2010 at 10:20 PM -0600, Scott Jones wrote: Thanks Tim. That worked, but I received my test text as an mms message, instead of just txt.. but 'num...@txt.att.net' didn't work.. I just hope in sending an mms message I am not billed differently. Don't know. I do know that they txt addr

Re: sending email to txt

On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:03:20AM -0400, Tim Gray wrote: >On Aug 01, 2010 at 09:56 PM -0600, Scott Jones wrote: >> I have tried sending to 'num...@txt.att.net' and it just bounces back, >> without delivery. > >I think num...@mms.att.net works. Nope. Doesn't work here. -- Roger http://rogerx.fr

Re: sending email to txt

On Aug 01, 2010 at 10:26 PM -0800, rog...@sdf.org wrote: Nope. Doesn't work here. I don't know. It worked the other day for me. Here's the complete list from wiki:

Re: sending email to txt

On Aug 02, 2010 at 08:27 AM -0400, Tim Gray wrote: On Aug 01, 2010 at 10:26 PM -0800, rog...@sdf.org wrote: Nope. Doesn't work here. I don't know. It worked the other day for me. Here's the complete list from wiki: To follow up on this

Re: sending email to txt

On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 09:46:55AM -0400, Tim Gray wrote: >On Aug 02, 2010 at 08:27 AM -0400, Tim Gray wrote: >> On Aug 01, 2010 at 10:26 PM -0800, rog...@sdf.org wrote: >>> Nope. Doesn't work here. >> >> I don't know. It worked the other day for me. Here's the complete list >> from wiki: >>

Re: sending email to txt

On Aug 03, 2010 at 12:00 AM -0800, rog...@sdf.org wrote: Maybe the reason for your delay was your smtp relays? Might not have been your person relay, but another one in between (ie. Big city) Who knows. I just tried both addresses now and they both came right through.

Re: sending email to txt

On Aug 03, 2010 at 12:00 AM -0800, rog...@sdf.org wrote: Maybe the reason for your delay was your smtp relays? Might not have been your person relay, but another one in between (ie. Big city) Sorry for the additional email. Forgot to add this: The mms address preserved my from email address

Mutt/GPG and sending email to Outlook/OE users

Hi, I have mutt 1.2.5.i and use gnupg 1.0.4. I am trying to send GPG signed messages to Outlook/OE users using PGP 6.5.8 and PGP 7.0.3. I have setup the appropiate send-hook to setup "set pgp_create_traditional=yes" for these users. However, when they receive the message. It seems to show up as an

Mutt/GPG and sending email to Outlook/OE users

Hi, I have mutt 1.2.5.i and use gnupg 1.0.4. I am trying to send GPG signed messages to Outlook/OE users using PGP 6.5.8 and PGP 7.0.3. I have setup the appropiate send-hook to setup "set pgp_create_traditional=yes" for these users. However, when they receive the message. It seems to show up as an

Re: Mutt/GPG and sending email to Outlook/OE users

This functionality is called PGP/MIME and is a bit of a holy debate on the correct way to do PGP messages. The general consensus seems to be that the Network Associates way of doing PGP is less correct than the PGP/MIME way. There's a source hack floating around for mutt that sends PGP messages

How to warn before sending email if "Subject:" is empty

Is it possible to make Mutt warn about an empty "Subject:" right before sending the email? The `abort_nosubject` configuration variable is not relevant here because `abort_nosubject` is only for configuring what happens when there is no subject given at the subject prompt. I am looking for someth

help on complicated per-folder or per-sender sending email hooks

Dear friends, I finally and successfully moved my work email to mutt a few months ago and it has been working all right so far, but for two of my unresolved issues which I would like to finally address, with some help and advice. My second issue is on improving search abilities, but I want to f

Re: How to warn before sending email if "Subject:" is empty

On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 05:18:57AM +, Sam Lee via Mutt-users wrote: > Is it possible to make Mutt warn about an empty "Subject:" right before > sending the email? > > The `abort_nosubject` configuration variable is not relevant here > because `abort_nosubject` is only for configuring what happ

sending email - mutt waiting for long periods of time on "Sending message..."

Hi all, When sending messages in mutt (Mutt 1.5.17 (2007-11-01), mutt seems to spend anywhere between 8 and 30 seconds trying to send the message. All i see is "Sending message..." And then 20 seconds latter it sends and returns me to my INBOX. This is on an adhoc basis ... maybe 1 out of ev

Re: sending email - mutt waiting for long periods of time on "Sending

0n Wed, May 21, 2008 at 03:30:42AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: >Well, to *debug* it is easy, just use mutt's debugging mode, and have >`tail -F ~/.muttdebug0` running in another terminal. > >Generally, though, that's probably an issue with your sendmail, and >you can just

Re: sending email - mutt waiting for long periods of time on "Sending message..."

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, May 21 at 03:04 PM, quoth Wilkinson, Alex: > Hi all, > > When sending messages in mutt (Mutt 1.5.17 (2007-11-01), mutt seems to spend > anywhere between 8 and 30 seconds trying to send the message. All i see is > > "Sending message..."

Re: [Mutt] help on complicated per-folder or per-sender sending email hooks

On Wednesday, November 24, 2021 at 10:23:31 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: set smtp_url="smtp://yourusern...@smtp.example.com:587/" set smtp_pass="Your1!Really2@AweSome3#Password" But what do I do about the work email that uses postfix? If you unset smtp_url mutt should connect to port 25 on loc

Re: [Mutt] help on complicated per-folder or per-sender sending email hooks

On Wed Nov24'21 06:21:06PM, Mihai Lazarescu wrote: > From: Mihai Lazarescu > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 18:21:06 +0100 > To: mutt-users@mutt.org > Subject: Re: [Mutt] help on complicated per-folder or per-sender sending > email hooks > > On Wednesday, November 24, 2021

Re: [Mutt] help on complicated per-folder or per-sender sending email hooks

On Thursday, November 25, 2021 at 18:32:50 -0600, mai...@email.com wrote: I had a few more questions. Is it possible to have a hook based on where the email is coming to? So, if I am in this folder, then I use the above, but I am wondering if I can have a hook that says something like if the e

Re: [Mutt] help on complicated per-folder or per-sender sending email hooks

On Fri Nov26'21 05:53:54PM, Mihai Lazarescu wrote: > From: Mihai Lazarescu > Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 17:53:54 +0100 > To: mutt-users@mutt.org > Subject: Re: [Mutt] help on complicated per-folder or per-sender sending > email hooks > > On Thursday, November 25, 2

Re: [Mutt] help on complicated per-folder or per-sender sending email hooks

On Friday, November 26, 2021 at 23:41:46 -0600, mai...@email.com wrote: Basically, if the email is postponed and called from the draft, it uses my work account (because that is set up to be the default). Is it possible to set things up so that mutt will look at the sending address (@email dot

Re: [Mutt] help on complicated per-folder or per-sender sending email hooks

On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 12:36:54PM +0100, Mihai Lazarescu wrote: > On Friday, November 26, 2021 at 23:41:46 -0600, mai...@email.com wrote: > > > Basically, if the email is postponed and called from the draft, it uses my > > work account (because that is set up to be the default). Is it possibl