editor.
I hear that a lot of improvements have been made to the development
version of w3m and that there will be another release soon. Maybe
printing will be among them.
Regarding trying to print an HTML attachment from within mutt: if you
are literally piping the attachment (using the command
Hi,
When I try to forward an email which has an
attachement, only the email body is forwarded. The
attachment is not being forwarded. The workaround wd
be to save the attachments to the disk and re-attach
it to the forwarded email. Is there a simpler way ?
Thank you the time.
regds
yadhu
Yadhu Govind proclaimed on mutt-users that:
When I try to forward an email which has an
attachement, only the email body is forwarded. The
attachment is not being forwarded. The workaround wd
be to save the attachments to the disk and re-attach
it to the forwarded email. Is there a simpler
Hi!
I often get mails with no text inside but a pgp encrypted msg as
attachment.
Because it is defined as a multi-part message, procmail and mutt does
not recognize the pgp encryption.
Parts of the msgs look like
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:52:50PM +0100, Daniel Kollar wrote:
Can procmail be instructed to remove the html stuff and to change the
mime type to "application/pgp" or what else is necessary ?
for the pgp stuff you can add:
:0
* !^Content-Type: text/plain
*
I have an email with an attachment. I have another email I want to reply
and take the attachment from the other message. Is this doable in Mutt?
Thanks,
-Clint
Yes : save the attachment from the first e-mail, then attach the file
while replying to the second.
-D
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:54:05AM -0800, Clint Olsen wrote:
| I have an email with an attachment. I have another email I want to reply
| and take the attachment from the other message
I sometimes have to send a message with a very large attachment, e.g. in
excess of 2 meg. I'd like to sent a cc of this message WITHOUT the
attachment to another recipient. Is there a way I can do this?
TIA
--
John P. Verel
Norwalk, CT
On 01/05/01, 05:43:50PM -0800, Mike E wrote:
* John P. Verel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I sometimes have to send a message with a very large attachment, e.g. in
excess of 2 meg. I'd like to sent a cc of this message WITHOUT the
attachment to another recipient. Is there a way I can do
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 07:32:21PM +0100, Byrial Jensen wrote:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 13:57:44 -0600, Petr Hlustik wrote:
A trivial problem using 1.2i: after I delete an attachment, sometimes the
index keeps showing huge message size, possibly because the Lines: field in
the header has
Darxus --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
% On 12/17, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
% Leave the message body blank, willya? That should solve the
% problem.
%
% Then I have a 0 byte attachment that I *still* can't delete, which is just
% more annoying.
mutt says that you do
How can I make mutt allow me to "...delete the only attachment" ?
In cases where a message body is truly not necessary, like emailing a list
server where the commands go in the subject, it really frustrates me that
I can't delete the extra stuff, which would be simple if
At 01:13 PM 12/17/00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In cases where a message body is truly not necessary, like emailing a list
server where the commands go in the subject, it really frustrates me that
I can't delete the extra stuff, which would be simple if it weren't for
this restriction.
On 12/17, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Leave the message body blank, willya? That should solve the
problem.
Then I have a 0 byte attachment that I *still* can't delete, which is just
more annoying.
Also, put something like "set abort_unmodified=ask-no" in your
.muttrc
D
On 12/18, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
as it is zero bytes, what is the problem? a waste of bandwidth? ;)
Severe annoyance. And it takes me longer to delete the existing lines in
the message body (signature) than it does to hit "D" to delete that
unnecessary attachement.
I guess what you're
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 13:57:44 -0600, Petr Hlustik wrote:
Hi,
A trivial problem using 1.2i: after I delete an attachment, sometimes the
index keeps showing huge message size, possibly because the Lines: field in
the header has not been modified. If I try showing headers and
edit-message
Hi,
A trivial problem using 1.2i: after I delete an attachment, sometimes the
index keeps showing huge message size, possibly because the Lines: field in
the header has not been modified. If I try showing headers and
edit-message, this field is off limits. Any ideas how to fix this?
Thanks
Hi!
When opening a received mail containing a text/plain MIME attachment
mutt always displays the contents of this attachment inside the pager.
This can cause a problem when the size of the attachment is several
MBytes big.
How do I prevent mutt from showing the contents of text/plain
On 2000-11-28 13:54:14 +0100, Daniel Kollar wrote:
When opening a received mail containing a text/plain MIME
attachment mutt always displays the contents of this attachment
inside the pager. This can cause a problem when the size of the
attachment is several MBytes big.
What kind of problem
On 001128, at 13:54:14, Daniel Kollar wrote:
When opening a received mail containing a text/plain MIME attachment
mutt always displays the contents of this attachment inside the pager.
This can cause a problem when the size of the attachment is several
MBytes big.
How do I prevent mutt
Hello!
When composing a new mail and adding attachments, mutt cuts the name
of the attached files after a specific length of characters.
When I attach a file with a long path I'm not able to read the file
name in the attachment list.
Mutt seems to bring the lines to 80 columns. My xterm is much
Rodrigo Rezende [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to known how can I send an e-mail with an attachment using only
the prompt command.
when I use mutt e-mail -s "subject" -a file the program opens a
vi screen that is to type something...
I don't w
Hi,
I'd like to known how can I send an e-mail with an attachment using only the
prompt command.
when I use mutt e-mail -s "subject" -a file the program opens a vi
screen that is to type something...
I don't want to use that.. I just only want to type the command and send
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 06:37:55PM -0200, Rodrigo Rezende wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to known how can I send an e-mail with an attachment using only the
prompt command.
when I use mutt e-mail -s "subject" -a file the program opens a vi
screen that is to type something...
I don't w
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 06:37:55PM -0200, Rodrigo Rezende wrote:
when I use mutt e-mail -s "subject" -a file the program opens a vi
screen that is to type something...
I don't want to use that.. I just only want to type the command and send the
e-mail with the attachmen
-Mensagem original-
De: Rodrigo Rezende
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 30 de outubro de 2000 18:38
Para: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Assunto: attachment
Hi,
I'd like to known how can I send an e-mail with an attachment using only
the prompt command.
when I use mutt e
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Attach a file:
macro compose f2 'attach-file/path/to/fileenter'
yes, this works.
Open up a directory:
macro compose f2 'attach-file/path/to/dir/complete'
This way you get the directory attached! Adding a second
complete is necessary:
d the user chooses the attachment he wants.
Well, you can make it attach a specific file, or make it present a
directory.
Attach a file:
macro compose f2 'attach-file/path/to/fileenter'
Open up a directory:
macro compose f2 'attach-file/path/to/dir/complete'
Untested, but I hope
Is it possible to attach a file via macro?
This doesn't work:
macro compose f2 "attach-file=/home/mark/templates/mime"
Perhaps it would be more elegant if the macro just offers the
templates directory and the user chooses the attachment he wants.
Regards,
Mark Weinem
Hi,
do you remember that I asked for a recursive MIME attachment recognition in mutt?
The problem was, that I often receive MIME attachment as octet-stream which are PGP
encrypted HTML pages.
What I need is an octet-filter, which recognizes the pgp encryption, starts the
decryption, recognizes
Hi,
do you remember that I asked for a recursive MIME attachment recognition in mutt?
The problem was, that I often receive MIME attachment as octet-stream which are PGP
encrypted HTML pages.
What I need is an octet-filter, which recognizes the pgp encryption, starts the
decryption, recognizes
Hi,
I think somebody asked about this earlier but the problem apparently
persists: mutt does not decode attachment names. Example:
[-- Attachment #2: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?mar=BBa=2Ejpg?= --]
[-- Type: image/jpeg, Encoding: base64, Size: 33K --]
Obviously, when trying to save this, mutt offers
On 2000-09-27 13:29:35 -0500, Petr Hlustik wrote:
I think somebody asked about this earlier but the problem apparently
persists: mutt does not decode attachment names. Example:
[-- Attachment #2: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?mar=BBa=2Ejpg?= --]
[-- Type: image/jpeg, Encoding: base64, Size: 33K
Petr Hlustik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Sep 2000:
I think somebody asked about this earlier but the problem apparently
persists: mutt does not decode attachment names.
Assuming the name encoding was done correctly by the sender's mailer,
can this be fixed or worked around in mutt
Hi,
I'm curious why Mutt would set the Content-Disposition: attachment for a
text/plain message, replying to a text/plain message. Here's the relevant
headers from the outgoing message as saved by Mutt in my Sent folder:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content
at when invoked will do "sz stressre1.exe" as if I had saved the
attachment, exited mutt, and typed that at the shell.
This is not currently possible. I'm not even sure how you would script that
sort of functionality either, because you'd have to have some language
constructs that sa
Hi,
John Buttery muttered:
macro attach o ":pipe-entry\ncat /tmp/001 ; sz /tmp/001\n" "Send file"
pipe-entry is a function, no ':' needed :)
macro attach o "pipe-entrycat /tmp/test"\n
should work
HTH,
Michael
--
It was kinda like stuffing the wrong card in a computer, when you're
stickin'
John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 02 Sep 2000:
In other news, I tried the shell script idea
I think that's the right approach, though it could be done in just Mutt
macros too probably... But in a shell script you can use a temp
filename and check it doesn't exist and all that kind
xe" as if I had saved the
attachment, exited mutt, and typed that at the shell.
This is not currently possible. I'm not even sure how you would script that
sort of functionality either, because you'd have to have some language
constructs that say 'get-me-the-name-of-message-102-attachm
This is less a question about a specific implementation (although I
would like to know how to do this) and more about the concept in
general; is it possible to, at the stroke of a key (macro), have mutt save
an attachment to a file and then run a shell commandline with the saved
file's name
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 08:04:23AM -0500, John Buttery wrote:
Basically, the end result is that if I have a file called
"stressre1.exe" (for example) attached to an email, I can write a macro
that when invoked will do "sz stressre1.exe" as if I had saved the
att
I just got struck (yet again) by the evil "I say I'm going to attach a
file in my email body but when I go to the send screen I forget to attach
it" bug.
Has anybody setup a vim keybind to prompt for a filename and add the
Attach: header for mutt to automagically attach a file? I'm looking for
On 2000-05-27 21:49:21 -0400, John P. Verel wrote:
Ah. So the issue is the sender, in this case
presumably Lotus Notes.
Yes, it is, and it is complete and utter brain-damage on
Lotus' side. For some kind of handler, you may try the
attached shell script, which helps at least in some
I've received a couple of attachments which are MS Word in format.
They were forwarded to me by another recipient.
The attachments are preceded by the following text:
UUEncoded file named: 1073313B.doc follows)
(Its format is: Lotus Manuscript 1.0 )
Following that is the ASCII encoded mess.
on the originator's MUA).
If you get mail from this (these) person(s) regularly, you might suggest
to him/her (them) that he/she (they) change the MUA's attachment settings
to MIME.
%
% Following that is the ASCII encoded mess.
%
% If I re-send the message, pick it up in W98/MSWord, (you'll pardon
FWIW, I've also adopted Look Out! as the new
name :)
use that to save it, and then open the saved attachment in MSWord". It's
no great shakes to decode a uuencoded file (can you guess how? :-) but
it's not a standard MIME type and probably just showed up as embedded in
the text bo
I have tried briefly to learn from the manual how I may
indicate in the index whether message has an attachment.
What should I set for this?
thanx
--
Eric Smith
On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 02:59:01AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Corey G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 04 May 2000:
Would changing your umask work?
Probably not, my umask is 022 and Mutt still creates new folders and
saved files with mode 600. I think it's a security precaution and a
Corey G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 04 May 2000:
Would changing your umask work?
Probably not, my umask is 022 and Mutt still creates new folders and
saved files with mode 600. I think it's a security precaution and a
good default, since usually you do not want other people reading your
Josh Kuperman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Someone sent me a mail with about 12 attachments, some I need, some I
don't, some I need to forward to a machine on a different network. Is
their a way to tell mutt to forward a message and select attachments
to be forwarded with the messages
Hi,
Someone sent me a mail with about 12 attachments, some I need, some I
don't, some I need to forward to a machine on a different network. Is
their a way to tell mutt to forward a message and select attachments
to be forwarded with the messages
--
Josh Kuperman
[EMAIL
Hello,
In the spirit of recent queries in this list: can Mutt attach an
attachment from another message? I guess this question needs some
elaboration:
Suppose, Alice sends me a message with an attachment X. I save it in my
mailbox. A week later Bob sends me another message. I reply
On 2000-02-22 15:20:13 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
Is there a simpler way?
Not currently.
Would it be hard to enable view-attachments in attach-message
mode? And maybe even allowing tagging some of the attachments
there?
Probably, this would indeed be possible. However, I'm afraid
Reply-To:
Hi,
I've been having some annoying things happen in Mutt that I was wondering if someone
with more experience could help me solve.
First, I am in several mailing lists (this one included) where, when I press 's' to
save the message, Mutt offers to save it in a file named whatever
On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 08:55:38AM -0500, Jon Walthour wrote:
First, I am in several mailing lists (this one included) where, when
I press 's' to save the message, Mutt offers to save it in a file
named whatever the sender's email address is rather than based on
the mailing list name (located
Jon Walthour [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
First, I am in several mailing lists (this one included) where, when I
press 's' to save the message, Mutt offers to save it in a file named
whatever the sender's email address is rather than based on the mailing
list name (located in the To: header). I
Steve Kennedy [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
OK I have one too. I have about 1300 messages sent from Nobody and
I want to bounce them all to another address (or better pipe them
all individually to a program), then delete them.
T ~f nobody
;b (to bounce)
;| (to pipe)
;d
--
Jeremy Blosser |
Sorry, forgot the attachment (as usual).
--
Jeremy M. Dolan [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (root@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by imaxx.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA28450
for jmd@localhost; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:05:19 -0500
Received
The mime type I am trying to deal with is:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description: Unknown Document
Content-Disposition: attachment;
Any help in decoding this would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Peter
--
Peter Dominguez
72 Belvedere Dr
Yonkers, NY 10705-2814
(914) 423
The mime type I am trying to deal with is:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description: Unknown Document
Content-Disposition: attachment;
Any help in decoding this would be greatly appreciated.
'v' for view, 's' for save. What's the mystery? I think this is one
where RTFM
On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 03:16:24PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Erm, I haven't been reading this thread, but is there a reason
$forward_weed doesn't work for you?
my forward_weed is set.
hmm strange. i tried a mix with 2 text files and one jpg file
and it worked fine.
also Mutt 1.0pre3us (1999-09-25).
jan
On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 02:41:23AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
It's not that of a deal, but there are times when I don't really want
the original headers traveling in my forward. Ideas?
Sorry, i have no idea! I noticed the same behaviour and didnt really
like it either
Maybe
just the word document to someone. How do
I do it?
I tried $mime_forward, but that made the whole original email one attachment,
and I couldn't see how to remove the parts I didn't want to forward.
Tried starting a new message, using `A' (attach-message), and tagging original
message
ord documents that contain one paragraph...) and
further say that I want to forward just the word document to someone. How do
I do it?
I tried $mime_forward, but that made the whole original email one attachment,
and I couldn't see how to remove the parts I didn't want to forward.
Tried starting
On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 11:04:39AM -0700, Todd Strilchuk wrote:
hmmm... i tried that with my version of mutt (0.95.6us) and it
wouldn't include certain attachements in my message. for example,
someone sent me a jpg file which i tried to forward on to someone
else. i did the view
agraph...) and
further say that I want to forward just the word document to someone. How do
I do it?
I tried $mime_forward, but that made the whole original email one attachment,
and I couldn't see how to remove the parts I didn't want to forward.
Tried starting a new message, using `A
$mime_forward, but that made the whole original email one attachment,
and I couldn't see how to remove the parts I didn't want to forward.
Tried starting a new message, using `A' (attach-message), and tagging original
message; same deal. And just tagging the word document I wanted to forward
didn't seem
it?
If you forward from the attachements menu view-attachments, you'll get
just the attachment. (To forward more than one, first tag those you
wish to forward).
You may find it useful to review the variables "forward_attachment",
"forward_decode" to see what affect, if any, they'll
On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 06:54:30AM -0700, David Ellement wrote:
You may find it useful to review the variables "forward_attachment",
forward_attachment: unknown variable
$mime_forward, but that made the whole original email one attachment,
and I couldn't see how to remove the parts I didn't want to forward.
Tried starting a new message, using `A' (attach-message), and tagging original
message; same deal. And just tagging the word document I wanted to forward
didn't seem
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 02:25:11PM +0200, Stasinos Konstantopoulos wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering, is there a way to use mutt on the command line to
extract an attachment from an email? What I'm trying to do is have a
script that will save to a predefined directory all attachments
included
On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 02:50:11PM -0700, Robert Chien wrote:
Sometimes I need to forward one or more emails to another
worker as attachment(s).
If I save it to a file, then attach that file, it sort of
works but takes a lot of time, esp.
I learned something from the answers
Hi,
Sometimes I need to forward one or more emails to another
worker as attachment(s). How do I do that in mutt?
If I save it to a file, then attach that file, it sort of
works but takes a lot of time, esp. if I'm attaching 3+
emails. Would be nice if I can presss a, and choose files
or emails
At 5:50 PM EDT on August 6 Robert Chien sent off:
Sometimes I need to forward one or more emails to another
worker as attachment(s). How do I do that in mutt?
Tag the messages you want to forward then ";f" (tag-forward) will put
them all in your editor for sending. If you
Hi!
On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 02:50:11PM -0700, Robert Chien wrote:
If I save it to a file, then attach that file, it sort of
works but takes a lot of time, esp. if I'm attaching 3+
emails. Would be nice if I can presss a, and choose files
or emails to attach. This is my wish list item.
Robert Chien [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Sometimes I need to forward one or more emails to another
worker as attachment(s). How do I do that in mutt?
If I save it to a file, then attach that file, it sort of
works but takes a lot of time, esp. if I'm attaching 3+
emails. Would be nice if I
When I see these lines with things like %u, etc., I am completely befuddled. Can
someone tell me where I can find an explanation of these?
At 06:20 PM 7/12/99 -0500, you wrote:
Brian Salter-Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could anyone tell me where this limitation is in the code or is there
a
subtype
%n attachment number
%s size
%t tagged flag
%u unlink (=to delete) flag
%X right justify the rest of the string and pad with character "X"
%|X pad to the end of the line with character "X"
HTH
--
___
{~._.~}Renaud COLINET
Brian Salter-Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could anyone tell me where this limitation is in the code or is there
a way to configure this in .muttrc.
It's not in the code, it's in the attach_format variable.
Here's the one I use:
set attach_format='%u%D%t%2n [%5s] "%d" % %e %m/%M '
--
The attachemnt menu shows the mime type/subtype with a maximum of
7 characters for type (e.g. applica/) and 10 characters for the
subtype. Could anyone tell me where this limitation is in the
code or is there a way to configure this in .muttrc. I have
a pair of subtypes where the first 10
I mean that the message is also send as a attachment.
On Tue, Jul 06, 1999 at 12:03:06AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
Please format your mails to be wrapped at 70-75 chars.
Robin Gruyters [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I've got a liltle problem. If I send a message (to a wiblow user
Hi,
I've got a liltle problem. If I send a message (to a wiblow user) with mutt with a pgp
signed message, then he gets the message attached together with my pgp signature. I've
never had this problem it started last week when I recompiled mutt.
[ email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
On Mon, Jul
05, 1999 at 11:19:17AM +0200, Robin Gruyters wrote: I've got a
liltle problem. If I send a message (to a
Hi,
I've got a liltle problem. If I send a message (to a wiblow user) with mutt with a pgp
signed message, then he gets the message attached together with my pgp signature. I've
never had this problem it started last week when I recompiled mutt.
[ email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it started last week
when I recompiled mutt.
Do you mean the signature comes as an attachment to the main message?
There is nothing wrong with this, this is Mutt implementing the PGP/MIME
standard. See doc/PGP-Notes.txt that came with your distribution.
I'm not sure if that's what you mean
On 17-Jun-1999, David Travers wrote:
Can you send more than 1 file attachment from the command line using mutt
e.g mutt -a file1 file2 . etc.
Maybe mutt -a file1 -a file2 -a file3 ... ?
--
Ronny Haryanto
Hallo mutt developers,
here is another small bug, if attachment name contains encoding info:
5 =?iso-8859-2?Q?inzer=E1t.txt?=
[text/plain, quoted, 0,9K]
6 scan.zip
[applica/x-zip
On Thu Jun 17 10:31:53 1999,
David Travers wrote [To Mutt User List]:
Can you send more than 1 file attachment from the command line using mutt
e.g mutt -a file1 file2 . etc.
Try mutt -a file1 -a file2
--
Daniel `bonkey' Bauke; http://www.oho.com.pl/~bonkey/; {happiness=bikeunix;}
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
- Original Message -
From: David Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 07 June, 1999 11:56
Subject: Re: attachment problem
On Fri, Jun 04, 1999 at 09:55:27PM +, Jeffery Small wrote:
Is there some way to continue to use the "-remote" option t
David Thorburn-Gundlach writes:
Hi, folks --
This sounds familiar, but I couldn't find the answer in any of my
archived mutt posts... I'd like to remove an attachment from a
letter, such as the one that I might have airheadedly attached, or the
one that might have had a typo
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=h85LGMdA0M9ASxa6; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
501 - 593 of 593 matches
Mail list logo
