I realise to forward attachments along with the text (that you want to
edit) one has to
1) select the email you want to forward then press v to go to the
attachments menu
2) tag each attachment and the text part (body) of the email by
pressing t
on each element in the list of the attachments
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Aleks Owczarek on Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:38:08PM +1100:
Now, if any mutt developers are reading this. Please make this
convoluted process easier by adding a forward-with-attachments variable
or am i missing something?
I believe
-with-attachments variable
or am i missing something?
I believe mime_forward will do what you want. I have this:
message-hook . set mime_forward=no
message-hook ~h multipart set mime_forward=ask-yes
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
unfortunately that doesn't do it
I
Hy,
sorry for the OT question, but it depens on my lazyness and the
daily usability of mutt.
Periodical i get an automatic generated mail with an attachment with
tar-gz'ed ascii files, logs and configs. With the entry in the mailcap
configuration for application/x-gzip i use zless to view them
Generally, I want to forward all attachments along with any message I am
forwarding. What's the best way to configure mutt to achieve this?
--
Mark Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 31, Mark Johnson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Generally, I want to forward all attachments along with any message I am
forwarding. What's the best way to configure mutt to achieve this?
see the manual entry for mime_forward.
msg24044/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thus spake Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Generally, I want to forward all attachments along with any message
I am forwarding. What's the best way to configure mutt to achieve
this?
see the manual entry for mime_forward.
Also, I have
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 07:59:27PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
I've noticed that quite a few people on this list send a
quoted/printable attachment with thier main message body even when
using mutt. It's not a problem really, I'm just curious as to why
this is.
I've not noticed this at
At some point hitherto, Steven Schneider hath spake thusly:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 07:59:27PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
I've noticed that quite a few people on this list send a
quoted/printable attachment with thier main message body even when
using mutt. It's not a problem really,
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 17:55:55 +0100, Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
boris karlov muttered:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
Well, is a charset too, isn't it?
i've tried this already. but, unfortunately, it does not work:
:charset-hook koi8-r\n
On Wed, 09 Jan 2002 17:01:30 +0100, Volker Moell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..skip..]
But isn't it possible that mutt detects the correct/intended filename to
save the file Datei Volker Moll 1.jpg instead the file
?iso-8859-1?Q?Datei=5FVolker_M=F6ll=5F1.jpg?= in the $folder directory
(=)?
I am using mutt 1.3.25i as my IMAP mail client. The problem I am now
having is to attach a file to outgoing mail. When I select the attach
file option followed by show files, I get a list of imap folders on
my server, instead of local files. How do I resolve this?
IMAP Specific settings:
set
Le 08/01/02 à 16:06, Frank Sonnemans écrivit:
I am using mutt 1.3.25i as my IMAP mail client. The problem I am now
having is to attach a file to outgoing mail. When I select the attach
file option followed by show files, I get a list of imap folders on
my server, instead of local files. How
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:37:11PM +0300, boris karlov wrote:
mutt-1.2.5i
i have charset=koi8-r in .muttrc, but mutt always assumes that my
text/plain attachments are in us-ascii charset if there is no certain
charset record in `Content-Type:' field. so i need to edit-type or manually
recode
mutt-1.2.5i
i have charset=koi8-r in .muttrc, but mutt always assumes that my
text/plain attachments are in us-ascii charset if there is no certain
charset record in `Content-Type:' field. so i need to edit-type or manually
recode affected attachments :-(.
mutt-1.0i works more suitable ;-) using
boris karlov muttered:
i have charset=koi8-r but mutt always assumes that my text/plain
attachments are in us-ascii charset if there is no certain charset
record in `Content-Type:' field.
do you know how to avoid such a behaviour of 1.2.5?
Look for charset-hook in the manual.
HTH,
Michael
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:04:41PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
boris karlov muttered:
i have charset=koi8-r but mutt always assumes that my text/plain
attachments are in us-ascii charset if there is no certain charset
record in `Content-Type:' field.
do you know how to avoid
boris karlov muttered:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:04:41PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
boris karlov muttered:
i have charset=koi8-r but mutt always assumes that my text/plain
attachments are in us-ascii charset if there is no certain charset
record in `Content-Type:' field.
do you
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
boris karlov muttered:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:04:41PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
boris karlov muttered:
i have charset=koi8-r but mutt always assumes that my text/plain
attachments are in us-ascii charset
boris karlov muttered:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
Well, is a charset too, isn't it?
i've tried this already. but, unfortunately, it does not work:
:charset-hook koi8-r\n
empty (sub)expression
Strange canÄt reproduce this with 1.2.5:
$ ./mutt -v
Mutt
I've RTFM and haven't seen a way for mutt to send (not display)
multipart/alternative attachments. Is there an external program that
can be used with mutt to do this? I was considering using an existing
message as a template, but I thought I read where the boundary string
has to be unique
Gary Johnson wrote:
Before this degenerates into a discussion of Why would you ever want
to do that? and Mail should be text/plain: The reason I want this
is that as secretary for an organization, I need to regularly
distribute a form to the members. The form was written as a Word
.
that should do what you want, no?
That will give me multiple attachments, which may be good enough, but I
was hoping to use the alternative tag to allow each recipient's MUA to
display only one version of the attachment, the one with the user's
preferred Content-Type. I was also hoping this would
Ooops, proof that that X-Uptime header's not entirely useless. Just
noticed I had a locked-up proftpd process that's been there for the last
4 hours :)
* Gary Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I've RTFM and haven't seen a way for mutt to send (not display)
multipart/alternative attachments
* Gary Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On the other hand, maybe giving them an explicit choice of formats
would be better.
Personally I'd multipart/alternate the Word version so even if word
breaks they can still read the message, and give a choice of not
including the word version at
the message, and give a choice of not
including the word version at signup. Same with HTML; I may well be
able to read HTML messages, but if lynx breaks I'd still like to be able
to read it, if only to find how to change it :)
What I meant was that maybe I should send the attachments to everyone
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 18:49:15 +
From: Bruno Postle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: setting content-type of attachments
On Sun 02-Dec-2001 at 07:34:42PM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
how does Mutt derive what to set the Content Type of attachments
On Thu 13-Dec-2001 at 11:53:10AM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
I would be interested if somebody had a better solution involving
mime-magic or something that didn't rely on file extensions.
Sorry for replying this late, but have you checked how file(1) works?
Yep, it's something that
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 13:14:35 +
From: Bruno Postle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: setting content-type of attachments
On Thu 13-Dec-2001 at 11:53:10AM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
I would be interested if somebody had a better solution
Hi all,
how does Mutt derive what to set the Content Type of attachments to?
This because mutt thinks some attachments are application/octet-stream
while the infact could be specified better...
TIA,
--
René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The Force. It surrounds us
On Sun 02-Dec-2001 at 07:34:42PM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
how does Mutt derive what to set the Content Type of attachments to?
Mainly from looking it up in the /etc/mime.types and ~/.mime.types
files.
I would be interested if somebody had a better solution involving
mime-magic or something
On Sun 02-Dec-2001 at 09:11:37PM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
* Bruno Postle [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-12-2001 20:06]:
| On Sun 02-Dec-2001 at 07:34:42PM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
|
| how does Mutt derive what to set the Content Type of attachments to?
|
| Mainly from looking it up in the /etc
* Bruno Postle [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-12-2001 21:30]:
[...]
| ..also look in /usr/mumble/mutt/mime.types.
Forgot the fact that I didn't configure mutt with /etc as sysconfdir.
It works now. Thanks!
| (It isn't a .DOC file is it? I just thought I'd ask)
I forgive you ;)
--
René Clerc
Hi
I recently started gpg signing all the mails I send with mutt.
Mutt displays these mails fine, but some people using for example MS
Outlook see my plaintext message as an attachment. With a second
attachment for the signature. Is there something I can do on my side so
that my mail is
* Fred Strauss [EMAIL PROTECTED] [15-11-2001 11:44]:
| I recently started gpg signing all the mails I send with mutt.
| Mutt displays these mails fine, but some people using for example MS
| Outlook see my plaintext message as an attachment. With a second
| attachment for the signature. Is there
Fred Strauss wrote:
I recently started gpg signing all the mails I send with mutt. Mutt
displays these mails fine, but some people using for example MS
Outlook see my plaintext message as an attachment. With a second
attachment for the signature. Is there something I can do on my side
so
Dylan Carlson muttered:
I have a source that I pull POP3 mail from, unfortunately receiving
html-only mail from places like Hotmail makes life difficult. I want
to strip out the html within Mutt and view these attachments from POP3
fetches in plain text. Or I would be happy calling Lynx
Louis --
...and then Louis LeBlanc said...
% On 11/12/01 10:06 PM, David T-G sat at the `puter and typed:
%
% % could change the keybindings from ESCP to something easier tho, so I
% % guess even that doesn't really matter.
%
% If you don't like having to use esc-P you could always use
On 11/10/01 01:26 PM, Will Yardley sat at the `puter and typed:
. . .
that seems a little harsh i'm sure there are many who would tell
those of us who use mutt to use a 'real mail program'. there's nothing
wrong with using mailx or other command line clients.
however sending myself
Hi,
thank you for your thoughts.
Thorsten
--
Omnis enim res, quae quando non deficit, dum habetur
et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est.
- Aurelius Augustinus
to strip out the html within Mutt and
% view these attachments from POP3 fetches in plain text. Or I would be happy
% calling Lynx to view these externally as well (2nd choice).
%
% What is the best way to do this?
%
% The FAQ advises editing the mailcap file, which I've done, but this doesn't
% apply
:
% % ...and then Will Yardley said...
% % % David T-G wrote:
% % %
% % % % attachments that cannot be read from some mail clients (commandline
...
% % noticed that even when you do send mail as pgp_create_traditional, it
% % still sends it as multipart. That's part of the problem. Shouldn't
in the ass. It involves the macro compose S Fgpg -a
% --clearsign -u . . . method. It does the job for now, but it is
% pretty ugly. There must be a cleaner way to do this.
There definitely should be. Interestingly enough, though, if that works
for attachments then that's the only way
difficult to use. With all of the screaming I've been doing lately
about *never* opening attachments, if all of my messages started appearing as
attachments only, I'd be slapped silly.
I might argue, in the case of recipients who's skills are somewhat basic,
that signing messages may not even
it the 'right way' and
everyone else doing it the 'wrong way'. pgp/mime is one standard, and
one that makes sense for a lot of reasons.
on the other hand, mutt is one of the very few MUAs that is pgp/mime
aware. it is funny that while we bitch when people send us other types
of mime attachments
On 11/10/01 06:08 PM, David T-G sat at the `puter and typed:
Will --
...and then Will Yardley said...
% David T-G wrote:
%
% % attachments that cannot be read from some mail clients (commandline
% % mail, for instance).
...
% % Anyway, I have been reprimanded, and so I
Hey all. I recently got my gpg setup and autosigning all outgoing
mail. Unfortunately, it seems that mutt started sending everything as
attachments that cannot be read from some mail clients (commandline
mail, for instance).
Anyway, I have been reprimanded, and so I promised
Louis --
...and then Louis LeBlanc said...
% Hey all. I recently got my gpg setup and autosigning all outgoing
Yay!
% mail. Unfortunately, it seems that mutt started sending everything as
% attachments that cannot be read from some mail clients (commandline
% mail, for instance
David T-G wrote:
% mail. Unfortunately, it seems that mutt started sending everything as
% attachments that cannot be read from some mail clients (commandline
% mail, for instance).
If you're just sending ordinary text, then you can get around this,
though that is the Wrong Way to do
Will --
...and then Will Yardley said...
% David T-G wrote:
%
% % attachments that cannot be read from some mail clients (commandline
% % mail, for instance).
...
% % Anyway, I have been reprimanded, and so I promised not to autosign
% % until I figured out what the deal
next to the files when
I typed t. BUTwhen I went back to the compose menu, the tagged
files showed up in the attachments section. So... the problem is
that the * is not showing up in the attachment menu. I'll have a look
at the menu in the morning to see about this. But if anyone has
That's what I do. All that happens is the cursor moves to the next file
name.
The manual notes that typing upper case A allows for tagging and
attaching multiple messages (not files) and that works for me. The
manual makes no mention of tagging files...only messages.
So, no luck here so far.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 10:20:41PM -0400, John P. Verel wrote:
That's what I do. All that happens is the cursor moves to the next file
name.
The manual notes that typing upper case A allows for tagging and
attaching multiple messages (not files) and that works for me. The
manual makes no
Perhaps your t is bound to something other than tag-entry. Perhaps
you're hitting q instead of Enter after tagging. When you tag files,
it should place a * next to the listed permissions. Does it at least do
that? If not, your t is probably wrong. If so, then just hit enter after
tagging
Well, I just tried something, with interesting result. I went to the
attach menu and pressed t twice. No * showed up next to the files when
I typed t. BUTwhen I went back to the compose menu, the tagged
files showed up in the attachments section. So... the problem
Works fine for me in 1.2.5i
Shawn
Previously, John P. Verel wrote:
% Did that. Does not work, on 1.2.5i
% On 10/17/01, 05:43:40PM -0700, Igor Pruchanskiy wrote:
% On Wed 17 Oct 2001, John P. Verel wrote:
% Hi. I sometimes want to attach multiple files from the same directory.
% I've
Works fine for me in 1.2.5i
worked great for me when i used 1.2.5i also
igor
--
Uptime: 45 days, 20:47
Zane, et al --
...and then Zane Crawford said...
% Short version:
% ==
% I want my Mutt setup to by default, NOT use PGP/MIME - it confuses too many of
Short answer:
set $pgp_create_traditional (so that mutt uses the pgp_clearsign_command)
and, if you wish to converse freely with
Hi All
I am having some trouble emailing specific attachments (file types). I can
send html attachments fine but my pdf files get corrupted.
Any ideas?
Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks,
Scott Trafford
_
Get your FREE
Scott --
...and then Scott Trafford said...
% Hi All
Hello!
%
% I am having some trouble emailing specific attachments (file types). I can
% send html attachments fine but my pdf files get corrupted.
How very interesting. That doesn't make any sense.
%
% Any ideas?
Post a [small
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 08:32:18AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
Hi,
[...]
1) what if the file name contains spaces ?
I tried quotin the file name, but tat didn't help
Try masquerading the space with an backslash.
If the backslash is not interpreted by mutt, it should work.
Jörn
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 08:32:18AM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote:
Hi,
[...]
1) what if the file name contains spaces ?
I tried quotin the file name, but tat didn't help
Try masquerading the space with an backslash.
If the backslash is not interpreted by mutt, it should work.
Jörn
Hi,
as it was discussed on this list recently, I can automatically attach
a file by putting
my_hdr Attach ~/fred.txt
into my ~/.muttrc.
Now I've two questions with this:
1) what if the file name contains spaces ?
I tried quotin the file name, but tat didn't help
2) can I modify the name
I am using mutt 1.2.5, but I can't read/view attachments if I don't first
save them into a separate file. When the viewer expects the name of a file
in the command-line, piping doesn't work; so how do other mutt users solve
this problem?
TIA,
Mack
Mack Stevenson wrote:
I am using mutt 1.2.5, but I can't read/view attachments if I don't first
save them into a separate file. When the viewer expects the name of a file
in the command-line, piping doesn't work; so how do other mutt users solve
this problem?
Just by pressing v
From: Volker Moell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ML mutt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Handling attachments
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:10:27 +0200
Mack Stevenson wrote:
I am using mutt 1.2.5, but I can't read/view attachments if I don't
first
save them into a separate file. When the viewer expects
Mack Stevenson wrote:
That's not what I meant :); after pressing 'v', I get a tree of the
attachments in this email. Suppose that one of them is an image, .e.g.,
monkey.jpg. How do I go about seeing that picture?
To successfully pipe it into an image viewer I would need an image viewer
That's not what I meant :); after pressing 'v', I get a
tree
of the attachments in this email. Suppose that one of them
is an image, .e.g., monkey.jpg. How do I go about seeing
that picture?
snip
Mutt handles this through MIME/mailcap. See this page,
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-5
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 12:40:45PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
Mack Stevenson wrote:
That's not what I meant :); after pressing 'v', I get a tree of the
attachments in this email. Suppose that one of them is an image, .e.g.,
monkey.jpg. How do I go about seeing that picture
Thank you all for your help; I didn't know about mailcap. Everything is
working fine now.
Cheers
Mack
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
hello,
is there a way to tell mutt in which order to process
attachments. in particular, i get lots of mail sent by
people who use outlook. that thing sends out 2 copies of the
message : plain text and html. in fact, the attachment menu
looks like this:
I 1 no description [multipa
Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
is there a way to tell mutt in which order to process
attachments. in particular, i get lots of mail sent by
people who use outlook. that thing sends out 2 copies of the
message : plain text and html.
looks like this
sure.
i do it like this:
# view annoying html
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-Wed-01 22:15 -0700]:
Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
is there a way to tell mutt in which order to process
attachments. in particular, i get lots of mail sent by
people who use outlook. that thing sends out 2 copies of the
message : plain text and html
On 2001.09.06, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Denis Perelyubskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the problem with outlook is that it also sends a plain text
copy along with html one. so i DO NOT WANT to start any kind
of browser, dump some output, then look at it in my pager if
i can somehow train
* David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-Wed-01 22:31 -0700]:
On 2001.09.06, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Denis Perelyubskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the problem with outlook is that it also sends a plain text
copy along with html one. so i DO NOT WANT to start any kind
of browser,
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:20:36PM -0700, Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
the problem with outlook is that it also sends a plain text
copy along with html one. so i DO NOT WANT to start any kind
of browser, dump some output, then look at it in my pager if
i can somehow train mutt to recognize that
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 07:27:36PM +0200, Morten Brix Pedersen wrote:
Users usually won't understand whats happening when you 'bounce' a mail
to them, because it looks like its the original author who sent the
e-mail.
So, is there a better way forwarding e-mail with attachments?
I would
with attachments?
- Morten.
--
Morten Brix Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.wtf.dk/hp/
Copenhagen, Denmark. -- Programmer, Scout, Geek.
Thus spake Morten Brix Pedersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
So, is there a better way forwarding e-mail with attachments?
Here's what I use:
message-hook . set mime_forward=no
message-hook ~h multipart set mime_forward=ask-yes
By default, all messages will be forwared inline
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 01:58:22PM -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote:
So, is there a better way forwarding e-mail with attachments?
Here's what I use:
message-hook . set mime_forward=no
message-hook ~h multipart set mime_forward=ask-yes
[...]
That what you're looking
On Aug 5, 13:58PM, Justin R. Miller wrote:
Thus spake Morten Brix Pedersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
So, is there a better way forwarding e-mail with attachments?
Here's what I use:
message-hook . set mime_forward=no
message-hook ~h multipart set mime_forward=ask-yes
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 09:28:59PM -0500, peter horst wrote:
On Aug 5, 13:58PM, Justin R. Miller wrote:
Thus spake Morten Brix Pedersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
So, is there a better way forwarding e-mail with attachments?
Here's what I use:
message-hook . set mime_forward
Thus spake peter horst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Is there a way to alter that formula so that it asks to mime_forward
all mails with multipart in the headers except mails marked
multipart/signed?
I would think that you could do this:
message-hook . set mime_forward=no
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 11:52:48AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
What does PGP mean here? GPG, PGP 5, PGP 6, ...?
I am using gpg.
I am also using a key server to look up keys that aren't on my keyring. I
have had no problems with anyone else, whether they are on the server or
not.
No big
On 2001-08-02 10:56:18 +0100, Sean Dempsey wrote:
I am also using a key server to look up keys that aren't on my
keyring. I have had no problems with anyone else, whether they
are on the server or not.
No big deal. I am just curious!
I'd suppose that gnupg tries to find out whether my key
Thomas,
When I try to read any of your mails, PGP hangs and has to be aborted with
ctrl+c
Any ideas,
Sean
What does PGP mean here? GPG, PGP 5, PGP 6, ...?
On 2001-08-02 10:41:29 +0100, Sean Dempsey wrote:
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 10:41:29 +0100
From: Sean Dempsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mutt is sending PGP as funky attachments
Mail-Followup-To: Sean Dempsey
Hello,
I'm sending some PGP e-mails to a user on MS Outlook. When they get the
message (this happens for me too) Outlook only shows two attachments. One
.asc file which is empty, and an .ATT file which has the encrypted message.
Is this a feature of Outlook or is this something Mutt
It's called PGP/MIME, and it's The Right Way of doing PGP with MIME.
On 2001-08-01 12:36:27 -0700, Chris S. wrote:
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 12:36:27 -0700
From: Chris S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mutt is sending PGP as funky attachments
Reply-To: Chris [EMAIL
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 12:36:27PM -0700, Chris S. wrote:
Hello,
I'm sending some PGP e-mails to a user on MS Outlook. When they get the
message (this happens for me too) Outlook only shows two attachments. One
.asc file which is empty, and an .ATT file which has the encrypted message
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 01:25:26AM +0200, Marco Ahrendt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 12:36:27PM -0700, Chris S. wrote:
Hello,
I'm sending some PGP e-mails to a user on MS Outlook. When they get the
message (this happens for me too) Outlook only shows two attachments. One
.asc
I'm gonna guess this has something to do with the hotmail and lycos
systems, but did you try sending these docs with another MUA?
If that does the job, you might want to check out your mailcap file.
HTH
Lou
On 07/03/01 10:10 AM, Masand, Manish sat at the `puter and typed:
Hi !
Could
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 02:27:04PM +0200, Masand, Manish wrote:
do excuse my ignorance, but what is MUA?
MUA = Mail User Agent
e.g. mutt, KMail, pine, elm, ...
HTH
Frank
--
Frank Derichsweiler
Please *NO* CC: I read the mailing list !
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:11:52AM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
I know this has been discussed before, but I can't seem to find it
now.
I am trying to find a way to view M$Word and Excel docs as attachments
in Mutt. I have to either get this working, or go back to an OS I'd
rather
Hello,
I have a question about saving text/plain attachments.
When I receive a text attachment from a Windows user and save the
attachment to my disk, the textfile will be converted from DOS-
to UNIX-format.
Most of the time, I forget to recode the files, because I need them on
a Windows box
docs as attachments
in Mutt. I have to either get this working, or go back to an OS I'd
rather not really use. For some reason, mswordview is not working
anymore with my mutt install, so I'd like to give another tool I heard
about (here, I think) a shot, especially since it also works on Excel
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:11:52AM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
I am trying to find a way to view M$Word and Excel docs as attachments
in Mutt. I have to either get this working, or go back to an OS I'd
rather not really use. For some reason, mswordview is not working
anymore with my mutt
Hi!
Seems simple enough, but forward just forwards and dosen't attach the
attachments that came with the origional message.
I think I said that right.
--
Chris S.
PGP 0x519E3777
PGP signature
On 2001-06-26 at 13:22:05, Chris S. warbled:
Hi!
Seems simple enough, but forward just forwards and dosen't attach the
attachments that came with the origional message.
See the section 2.5 Forwarding and Bouncing Mail in the manual.
Bouncing the message will do what you want, but if you
* Jason Helfman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010614 18:07]:
6.3.44. fcc_attach
Type: boolean Default: yes
This variable controls whether or not attachments on outgoing
messages are saved along with the main body of your message.
Thanks a lot. This works fine. I knew it was somewhere
601 - 700 of 918 matches
Mail list logo
