Bevan Broun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > fetchmail doesn't require that either (I'm not sure if you were implying
> > that it did, or not). And it can also be configured to use an
> > ssh-tunnel for the pop-retrieval.
>
> Yes I did think fetchmail required a local smtp, glad Im wrong. I
> might giv
on Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 03:18:31AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fetchmail doesn't require that either (I'm not sure if you were implying
> that it did, or not). And it can also be configured to use an
> ssh-tunnel for the pop-retrieval.
Yes I did think fetchmail required a
Bevan Broun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 01 Mar 2000:
> Im using a perl program called pop_perl5, which doesnt require
> sendmail running on the local machine and has a daemon mode. I make an
> ssh tunnel first:
fetchmail doesn't require that either (I'm not sure if you were implying
that it
on Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 09:21:51PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Breton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 29 Feb 2000:
> > There are a few solutions I can think of and I'm wondering if anyone
> > could advise me on which one might be best, or hopefully suggest a
> > better
Jim Breton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 29 Feb 2000:
> There are a few solutions I can think of and I'm wondering if anyone
> could advise me on which one might be best, or hopefully suggest a
> better one.
First of all, I'd recommend the approach to getting fetchmail. In the
daemon mode, i
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 01:25:09AM -0500, Jim Breton wrote:
> Any other ideas? Is there any way to bind a key directly to a shell
> command, or do I have to use the ! function?
Yes, I use fetchmail. It works very nicely in the background (when
daemon mode is enabled), will fetch from multiple ma
