compressed folders (compressed
folder patch by Roland Rosenfeld) or nntp (nntp patch by
Vsevolod Volkov), while keeping the above options, the
building process adds support for external dotlock
and also instals the mutt_dotlock program. Does anybody
has noticed this behaviour and would comment on it? I
»Sven Guckes« sagte am 2002-03-21 um 00:45:34 +0100 :
> who said that the "compressed folders patch"
> will work when using Maildir format? ;-)
Nobody, that's why I'd like to force mbox_type=mbox when saving to a
.bz2 file.
> append-hook? is this a new
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 00.45 +0100]:
[...snip...]
> append-hook? is this a new one?
It's only there if you use the compressed folders patch:
% cat .mutt/hooks.mutt | grep gz
### HOOKS-FOR-ARCHIVED-FOLDERS ###
open-hook \\.gz$ "gzip -cd %f > %t&quo
* Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-18 22:41]:
> I'm using Maildir as my default mbox type and also want
> to save old messages in my archive in mbox format. To
> do this, I'm using the compressed folders patch, and
> when I was still using mbox, this wor
Hi!
I'm using Maildir as my default mbox type and also want to save old
messages in my archive in mbox format. To do this, I'm using the
compressed folders patch, and when I was still using mbox, this worked
fine.
However, when mbox_type is set to Maildir, saving to .bz2 files won&#x
* Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-11-2001 20:28]:
| AFAIK it is possible and harmless to have multiple Instances of mutt
| running and accessing the same folders.
|
| I want to ask if anybody knows if that's still true when using
| compressed folders (to let multiple instan
AFAIK it is possible and harmless to have multiple Instances of mutt
running and accessing the same folders.
I want to ask if anybody knows if that's still true when using
compressed folders (to let multiple instances of mutt access the same
compressed folder at the same time).
thanks
Nicolas
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:11:26PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> In theory, you should be able to open and/or close and/or append any sort
> of mailbox this way; one idea that has crossed my mind is a encrypted
> mail folder (tar.pgp) but I haven't played with it and it requires an
> unencrypted temp
Manuel --
...and then Manuel Hendel said...
% Is it possible to use the compressed folders patch with maildir. What
% happens than. Does every mail gets compressed, or how does this work
% with maildir?
The way the compressed folder is recognized is through hooks. For an
mbox folder doing
On 2001.10.18, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Manuel Hendel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to use the compressed folders patch with maildir. What
> happens than. Does every mail gets compressed, or how does this work
> with maildir?
This p
Is it possible to use the compressed folders patch with maildir. What
happens than. Does every mail gets compressed, or how does this work
with maildir?
Thanks,
Manuel
In order to clean up my mailboxes, I'd like to move messages flagged
important AND older than a month to an archive mailbox. Can this be done
automatically? And/or based on scoring too?
Also, it would be fine to have the archive box compressed. I'm using a
patched mutt capable of that, but how to
j/jlambert/.muttrc, line 43: close-hook: unknown
> > command
> > Error in /home/1/j/jlambert/.muttrc, line 44: append-hook: unknown
> > command
>
> Well, if you didn't apply the Roland Rosenfeld's compressed-folders-
> patch...
>
> see http://www.spinnaker.d
ng errors:
>
> Error in /home/1/j/jlambert/.muttrc, line 42: open-hook: unknown
> command
> Error in /home/1/j/jlambert/.muttrc, line 43: close-hook: unknown
> command
> Error in /home/1/j/jlambert/.muttrc, line 44: append-hook: unknown
> command
Well, if you didn't apply the
These hooks don't work in my muttrc.
> open-hook \\.gz$ "gzip -cd %f > %t"
> close-hook \\.gz$ "gzip -c %t > %f"
> append-hook \\.gz$ "gzip -c %t >> %f"
I get the following errors:
Error in /home/1/j/jlambert/.muttrc, line 42: open-hook: unknown
command
Error in /home/1/j/jlambert/.muttrc, l
I have this in my muttrc and it works fine
open-hook \\.gz$ "gzip -cd %f > %t"
close-hook \\.gz$ "gzip -c %t > %f"
append-hook \\.gz$ "gzip -c %t >> %f"
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 10:56:35AM -0600, Chuck Campbell muttered:
| I just downloaded and installed 1.2.5i with the compressed folder option,
I just downloaded and installed 1.2.5i with the compressed folder option,
but I haven't (yet) understood the information on using this option.
The manual.txt file gives some open-hook, close-hook, append-hook
examples, but I'm left baffled by reading it all.
Am I supposed to put something like o
Rafael Laboissiere proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> The mutt package in Debian/unstable has already Roland's patch applied.
Ditto with the mutt-1.2.5 port in FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (cvsup'd as of two weeks
ago)
-suresh
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 09:02:37AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 07:21:24PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > Using a large mallet, Michael P. Soulier whacked out:
> >
> > > Now, if I need to search the gzipped copy, I can unzip it and use mutt's
> > > exce
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 08:21:17AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> Hey guys. My apologies if this is in the docs, you can just point me to
> it. Currently, I save every message at work that I've ever sent. This makes
> the outbox big quickly, so I copy the outbox occasionally and start with
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 07:21:24PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Using a large mallet, Michael P. Soulier whacked out:
>
> > Now, if I need to search the gzipped copy, I can unzip it and use mutt's
> > excellent regexp support. However, I'm wondering if there's a way to unzip it
>
>
Using a large mallet, Michael P. Soulier whacked out:
> Now, if I need to search the gzipped copy, I can unzip it and use mutt's
> excellent regexp support. However, I'm wondering if there's a way to unzip it
Use Roland Rosenfeld's gzipped folders patch. You can get prebuilt rpms at
http://
est guy in the room! Ok, maybe. ;-)
>
Well, I must be *really* lazy then. I use a combination of archive
folders for incoming list-mail via procmail filtering, and then use the
compressed folders patch to save off important info from mails into
compressed folders for the list. So I can search
Hey guys. My apologies if this is in the docs, you can just point me to
it. Currently, I save every message at work that I've ever sent. This makes
the outbox big quickly, so I copy the outbox occasionally and start with a new
one, gziping the old one.
Now, if I need to search the gzipped
'T DO THIS, if you do not want to loose mail!
> IIRC, there is no mechanism to merge changes in the compressed folder
> into the temporary uncompressed folder, so if you have a compressed
> folder open for reading, while a new mail arrives and is appended to
> this compresse
> Suresh Ramasubramanian:
> Sounds a lot like emacs thinking to me :)
you, youDANGEROUS PERSON!
ng, while a new mail arrives and is appended to
> this compressed folder, it will never been shown, but simply
> overwritten, when leaving the compressed folder with mutt.
>
> I suggest to use compressed folders only for archive folders but not
> for incoming folders.
an exception m
compressed folder
into the temporary uncompressed folder, so if you have a compressed
folder open for reading, while a new mail arrives and is appended to
this compressed folder, it will never been shown, but simply
overwritten, when leaving the compressed folder with mutt.
I suggest to use compressed folders
Hi clemensF, David T-G
Thank you for pointing me out :)
David T-G wrote:
> I'll leave the explanation from our friend clemens alone and also leave
> all of the credit for the rant :-)
>
> Yes, you can use procmail with compressed folders by compressing your
> incoming mai
Yuzhendo & Zhendong (perhaps one and the same) --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
% Can we use Procmail to play with the compressed mail folders? Since I
% found that even when mutt can deal with compressed folders, procmail
% will not deliver mails in compressed format. So there will
clemensF proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>the opposite of unix thinking, where a number of independant little
>programs to their speciality bound into a framework by a smart and small
>operating system, which operates the same way. your statement reveals
>micro$oft thinking: give the users one
> Zhendong:
> folders. After I've changed the mutt folders to gz format, procmail
> still delivers mails as uncompressed format, they can not work well
> together.
then run the mails through gzip. the line "| gzip >> " will append
compressed data to the folder. this has nothing to do with mu
ormat, they can not work well
together.
thanks.
zd
===
From: Lars Hecking
Subject: Re: support for compressed folders in 1.2?
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 08:59:24 -0700
> I'm making the move from 0.95.5i to 1.2
Eric --
...and then Eric Osborne said...
% Folks-
%
% I'm making the move from 0.95.5i to 1.2 to get all of the useful
% changes therein. However, I'd been using Alain Penders' support for
% compressed folders in 0.95.5i, and now can't live without it. :)
I can imagine
> I'm making the move from 0.95.5i to 1.2 to get all of the useful
> changes therein. However, I'd been using Alain Penders' support for
> compressed folders in 0.95.5i, and now can't live without it. :)
>
> I tried just patching the existing diffs in
heh. nevermind. found it on spinnaker. pls ignore...
eric
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 09:37:19AM -0400, Eric Osborne wrote:
> Folks-
>
> I'm making the move from 0.95.5i to 1.2 to get all of the useful
> changes therein. However, I'd been using Alain Penders
Folks-
I'm making the move from 0.95.5i to 1.2 to get all of the useful
changes therein. However, I'd been using Alain Penders' support for
compressed folders in 0.95.5i, and now can't live without it. :)
I tried just patching the existing diffs into 1.2, but o
forget it, i gzipped it and patched it, thanks for the help..
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 10:34:58AM -0500, Jason Helfman muttered:
| the error is that it isn't in gzip format, when i tried to download it,
| .gz extension was removed, added it of course wouldn't make a
| differencedoes anyone hav
the error is that it isn't in gzip format, when i tried to download it,
.gz extension was removed, added it of course wouldn't make a
differencedoes anyone have the patch, i looked on the mutt/contrib
site..no go
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 08:24:29AM -0500, Ronny Haryanto muttered:
| On 12-Apr-2
The mutt rpms at
http://mutt.linuxatwork.at/
come in a compressed-folders patch flavor - grab one with "cfp" in the
name.
This is also the place to watch for the mutt-1.2 rpms, which will appear
within a day or two of the source release.
Alec
--
Alec Hab
On 12-Apr-2000, Jason Helfman wrote:
> I'd like to use this patch, but how would I apply the patch to the
> source code?
tar xvfz mutt...tar.gz
cd mutt...
zcat /path/to/patch.compressed...gz | patch -p1
Ronny
I'd like to use this patch, but how would I apply the patch to the
source code?
- Original Message -
From: José Romildo Malaquias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 3:06 am
Subject: any chance of getting compressed folders in rhl mutt package?
> There is
There is around a patch for mutt that add support
for compression (gzip and bzip2) folders to mutt.
It allows me to keep my email archives from discussion
lists compressed, freeing disk space. It would be
nice to have the mutt package released by RedHat
with this patch applied. What does the rh de
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Gero Reichard wrote:
> > > :0
> > > * ^TO_:.*mutt-users.
> > > |gzip -c $s >> ~/Mail/mutt-users.gz
> Until now I never had problems with loosing mail. So I didnt need
> any "lock". BTW: Should I lock? What? Why? (As long as I'm the only
> person on my computer..)
Above you
> > > ~/.procmailrc:
> > > :0
> > > * ^TO_:.*mutt-users.
> > > |gzip -c $s >> ~/Mail/mutt-users.gz
> Until now I never had problems with loosing mail. So I didnt need any
> "lock". BTW: Should I lock? What? Why? (As long as I'm the only
> person on my computer..)
Just add the second colon at
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Gero Reichard wrote:
>
> > ~/.procmailrc:
> > :0
> > * ^TO_:.*mutt-users.
> > |gzip -c $s >> ~/Mail/mutt-users.gz
>
> I suggest to use compressed folders only for archive folders and not
> for incoming mail. Otherwise yo
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Gero Reichard wrote:
> ~/.procmailrc:
> :0
> * ^TO_:.*mutt-users.
> |gzip -c $s >> ~/Mail/mutt-users.gz
I suggest to use compressed folders only for archive folders and not
for incoming mail. Otherwise you risk to lose mail. In your above
example you do
Hi all.
Like Eric Thiele already posted, I also have problems with the N-Flag
by using 'mutt -y'. But I do only have this problems with compressed
folders.
Every other folder - uncompressed - shows the flag.
Does anybody know, where and how to fix this?
Just in case, I post p
Hi,
this is the first time ever I try to compile mutt. My system is Debian
2.1 (Linux 2.0.36).
I followed these steps:
- cp and untar/unzip mutt-1.0pre3i.tar.gz to the /tmp directory
- cp and gunzip patch-1.0pre3.rr.compressed.2 in the mutt-1.0pre3 dir
- apply the patch: patch -p0 mailto:[EM
There were four file descriptor leaks in the old versions of the
compressed folders patch. The attached patch fixes this problem.
The patch can be applied after most versions of the compressed folders
patch it should work with 0.95.*, 0.96.* and 1.0pre*.
Ciao
Roland
--
* [EMAIL
On Sun, 30 May 1999, Adam Lazur wrote:
> I've become addicted to compressed folders (bzip2'd folders even),
> and would like to migrate my mail over to IMAP as well, but from
> what I've seen it's not possible to do compressed folders over IMAP.
> Has anybody
I've become addicted to compressed folders (bzip2'd folders even), and
would like to migrate my mail over to IMAP as well, but from what I've
seen it's not possible to do compressed folders over IMAP. Has anybody
gotten this to work? Is it even possible to do within the IMAP
7;t seem to recognize compressed folders as having new mail...
Yes, xbuffy doesn't recognize compressed folders, too.
I wonder why. I thought mutt checks the timestamp not the contents of
the folder.
Shade and sweet water!
Stephan
--
| Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
mutt works fine with compressed folder but I like to compress the
mailinglist-folders which are sorted by procmail.
Do someone use procmail with compressed folders?
Shade and sweet water!
Stephan
--
| Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| WWW: http
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=4jXrM3lyYWu4nBt5; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Tue, Apr 06, 1999 at 12:28:26AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My apologies, I know this subject was treated a while ago, but I lost the
> mail which had this reference. I mean a pointer to a URL on info about
> compressed mail folders with Mutt; could anyone refresh my mind, please?
The
My apologies, I know this subject was treated a while ago, but I lost the
mail which had this reference. I mean a pointer to a URL on info about
compressed mail folders with Mutt; could anyone refresh my mind, please?
TIA
Horacio
--
Claves - GnuPG/PGP - Keys : http://www.rediris.es/cert/keyse
57 matches
Mail list logo
