Re: fcc-hook

Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 01:21:08PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > I'd like to disable fcc when sending to certain domains/addresses. > > What's the correct syntax? I've come up with > > > > fcc-hook @example.com /dev/null &g

Re: fcc-hook

On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 01:21:08PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: I'd like to disable fcc when sending to certain domains/addresses. What's the correct syntax? I've come up with fcc-hook @example.com /dev/null but this /dev/null thing looks kind of ugly. I with I could just uns

fcc-hook

Dear Colleagues, I'd like to disable fcc when sending to certain domains/addresses. What's the correct syntax? I've come up with fcc-hook @example.com /dev/null but this /dev/null thing looks kind of ugly. I with I could just unset fcc for some addresses. -- Victor Sudakov, V

Re: fcc-hook: how to tame it?

On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Jimmy Wu wrote: > > Another idea is to unhook fcc-hook inside your profile.mymail1. > Yeah! set 'unhook fcc-hook' in the profile.mymail1 solved the issue! Thank you very much! Marcelo

Re: fcc-hook: how to tame it?

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 18:55, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, du yang wrote: > >> On Tuesday 07/12/11 07:53:50 CST, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote: >> > I have fcc-hook in one of my 3 profile, like this: >> > >> > ~/.mutt/profile

Re: fcc-hook: how to tame it?

On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, du yang wrote: > On Tuesday 07/12/11 07:53:50 CST, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote: > > I have fcc-hook in one of my 3 profile, like this: > > > > ~/.mutt/profile.mymail3 > > fcc-hook . "+MyMail3/Sent" > > > > In my muttrc, I h

Re: fcc-hook: how to tame it?

On Tuesday 07/12/11 07:53:50 CST, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote: > I have fcc-hook in one of my 3 profile, like this: > > ~/.mutt/profile.mymail3 > fcc-hook . "+MyMail3/Sent" > > In my muttrc, I have: > unhook send-hook > send-hook . "source ~/.mu

fcc-hook: how to tame it?

I have fcc-hook in one of my 3 profile, like this: ~/.mutt/profile.mymail3 fcc-hook . "+MyMail3/Sent" In my muttrc, I have: unhook send-hook send-hook . "source ~/.mutt/profile.mymail1\n" send-hook ^(bla...@blabla.com|lalal...@somethings.org) "set mime_forward signatur

Re: Losing my mind? fcc-hook doesn't work for one *from* ?

On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 09:01:44PM +0200, Rado S wrote: > > > > and now fcc_hook is no longer applied ?! > > > Somethink along the lines of > > > default_hook="~f %s !~P | (~P ~C %s)" > > > So you'd better spell out the fcc-hook pattern > &

Re: Losing my mind? fcc-hook doesn't work for one *from* ?

t; > > > Somethink along the lines of > > > > default_hook="~f %s !~P | (~P ~C %s)" > > > > So you'd better spell out the fcc-hook pattern > > eg fcc-hook '~t @depesz.com' +depesz > > I did make it working, but I just don't

Re: Losing my mind? fcc-hook doesn't work for one *from* ?

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 06:12:24PM -0300, Monte Stevens wrote: > So, instead of > fcc-hook @depesz.com +depesz/ > you'd have > fcc-hook "~C @depesz\.com" +depesz/ > . > > I'm not sure what you want to match so I went with the ~C which would > evaluat

Re: Losing my mind? fcc-hook doesn't work for one *from* ?

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:56:59PM +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > Situation: > server martin.depesz.com > shell account depesz. > > i create test.rc with following content: > my_hdr From: depesz > fcc-hook @depesz.com +depesz/ > > start mutt with: >

Re: Losing my mind? fcc-hook doesn't work for one *from* ?

unless forced too > Just set $from instead > > > fcc-hook @depesz.com +depesz/ > > > > start mutt with: > > mutt -n -F test.rc > > > > i see that fcc has been correctly set to depesz/ > > > > Now. > > > > I change the m

Re: Losing my mind? fcc-hook doesn't work for one *from* ?

* On Thu, May 27, 2010 12:56PM +0200 hubert depesz lubaczewski (dep...@depesz.com) muttered: > i create test.rc with following content: > my_hdr From: depesz Well you shouldn't use my_hdr unless forced too Just set $from instead > fcc-hook @depesz.com +depesz/ > > start

Re: Losing my mind? fcc-hook doesn't work for one *from* ?

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:55:59PM +0200, Jostein Berntsen wrote: > On 27.05.10,12:56, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > > Situation: > > server martin.depesz.com > > shell account depesz. > > > > i create test.rc with following content: > > my_hdr From: d

Re: Losing my mind? fcc-hook doesn't work for one *from* ?

On 27.05.10,12:56, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > Situation: > server martin.depesz.com > shell account depesz. > > i create test.rc with following content: > my_hdr From: depesz > fcc-hook @depesz.com +depesz/ > > start mutt with: > mutt -n -F test.rc >

Losing my mind? fcc-hook doesn't work for one *from* ?

Situation: server martin.depesz.com shell account depesz. i create test.rc with following content: my_hdr From: depesz fcc-hook @depesz.com +depesz/ start mutt with: mutt -n -F test.rc ignore messages about missing directories, write mail to myself, and on finish screen, i see that fcc has

Re: fcc-hook (was: unable to set working send-hook)

On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Ennio-Sr wrote: > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [110708, 01:53]: > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:37:18AM +0200, Ennio-Sr wrote: > > > fcc-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Mail/Sent/Test # nasr.. being my _From_ > > > address > > >

Re: fcc-hook (was: unable to set working send-hook)

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [110708, 01:53]: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:37:18AM +0200, Ennio-Sr wrote: > > fcc-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Mail/Sent/Test # nasr.. being my _From_ > > address > > > > worked for me! Note that writin

[OT] Re: MTA and fcc-hook

On Wed 09.Jan.08 19:46, Michelle Konzack wrote: Am 2008-01-08 19:46:58, schrieb Rado S: =- Lucas GR wrote on Tue 8.Jan'08 at 18:57:11 +0100 -= I was wondering if it could be possible to use differents smtp servers depending of the destinatary of the email. exim, postfix or courier, even ssmt

Re: MTA and fcc-hook

Yes, it did work very well :) With the help of this hint i could discover the reason of why it ignored the record set in the folder-hook. It was because of this line at fcc-hooks: fcc-hook .* =mailboxes/mydir Once the line is commented and all folder-hooks are set up everything works

Re: MTA and fcc-hook

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, January 11 at 04:25 AM, quoth Lucas GR: > I would like to auto save a copy of the sent email in the same > mailbox where it is sent from. This should do it: fcc-hook . ^ ~Kyle - -- Testing can show the presence of errors, b

Re: MTA and fcc-hook

El 0, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > How do you want archive this from mutt? > exim, postfix or courier, even ssmtp or msmtp can not change the > SMTP-Relay on the fly. This is a config option from the MTA. I was thinking of a macro wich reconfigured and restarted exim or wh

Re: MTA and fcc-hook

Am 2008-01-08 19:46:58, schrieb Rado S: > =- Lucas GR wrote on Tue 8.Jan'08 at 18:57:11 +0100 -= > > > I was wondering if it could be possible to use differents smtp > > servers depending of the destinatary of the email. > > Yes, see "send-hook" cmd and "sendmail" var. How do you want archive t

Re: MTA and fcc-hook

Hi again, Thank you for your help. Now emails are sent from where i want to, I would like to auto save a copy of the sent email in the same mailbox where it is sent from. In muttrc I have: set record=+mailboxes/mydir In folder-hooks I have: folder-hook =mailboxes/m

Re: MTA and fcc-hook

=- Lucas GR wrote on Tue 8.Jan'08 at 18:57:11 +0100 -= > I was wondering if it could be possible to use differents smtp > servers depending of the destinatary of the email. Yes, see "send-hook" cmd and "sendmail" var. > Perhaps this configuration is only possible in my MTA. See faq for this.

MTA and fcc-hook

Hi, I was wondering if it could be possible to use differents smtp servers depending of the destinatary of the email. For example, using dinamic IP services as it is my case servers like gmail won't accept email coming from my domain, so I have to use their own smtp server. But, is it possible to

Re: First "fcc-hook" is not more working...

Hi, * Michelle Konzack wrote: Hello Rocco, The problem is definitivly NOT IN MUTT since I get exact the same error now in one of my scripts usin "egrep" Here the code sniplet: 8<-- elif `echo "${LINE}" |egrep '^(---|

Re: First "fcc-hook" is not more working...

Hello Rocco, The problem is definitivly NOT IN MUTT since I get exact the same error now in one of my scripts usin "egrep" Am 2007-11-30 15:22:54, schrieb Rocco Rutte: > * Michelle Konzack wrote: > >8<-- > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/]

Re: First "fcc-hook" is not more working...

;source: errors in /home/michelle.konzack/.mutt/muttrc > >8<------ > > >Now, the first "fcc-hook" do not more work. I have chnaged it to > > > fcc-hook '~t .*@(bugs|packages|qa)\.debian\.org' =.BTS_debian/ > > >but the

Re: First "fcc-hook" is not more working...

in /home/michelle.konzack/.mutt/muttrc, line 18: source: errors in /home/michelle.konzack/.mutt/hook-fcc source: errors in /home/michelle.konzack/.mutt/muttrc 8<-- Now, the first "fcc-hook" do not more work. I ha

First "fcc-hook" is not more working...

tt/hook-fcc' ]-- ####### # # # fcc-hook [!] # # is recipient, is where to save a copy # fcc-hook '~t @(bugs|packages|qa)\.debian\.org' =.BTS_debian/ fcc

Re: [Bug?] fcc-hook or $record with IMAP boxes

Christian Ebert wrote: >> No change, neither with =Sent nor with +Sent. > > Perhaps the prob is related to IMAP, I can't test because I don't > use it. Still what you could do is check the values in running > Mutt: > > :set ?record record="imap://imap.birkenwald.de/Sent" > :set ?folder folder

Re: [Bug?] fcc-hook or $record with IMAP boxes

* Bernhard Schmidt on Wednesday, February 21, 2007 at 12:43:54 +0100: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:19:01PM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote: >> * Bernhard Schmidt on Wednesday, February 21, 2007 at 11:26:26 +0100: >>>| folder-hook . set record = =Sent >> >> I gues Mutt is confused by unquoted spaces i

Re: [Bug?] fcc-hook or $record with IMAP boxes

On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:19:01PM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote: > * Bernhard Schmidt on Wednesday, February 21, 2007 at 11:26:26 +0100: > >| folder-hook . set record = =Sent > > I gues Mutt is confused by unquoted spaces inside the command. > > Try: > > folder-hook . 'set record="+Sent"' No c

Re: [Bug?] fcc-hook or $record with IMAP boxes

* Bernhard Schmidt on Wednesday, February 21, 2007 at 11:26:26 +0100: >| folder-hook . set record = =Sent I gues Mutt is confused by unquoted spaces inside the command. Try: folder-hook . 'set record="+Sent"' c -- _B A U S T E L L E N_ lesen! --->>

[Bug?] fcc-hook or $record with IMAP boxes

Hi, I'm running mutt (Debian 1.5.13 package) with IMAP mailboxes only and I'm trying to save my sent mail to the Sent folder of this IMAP account (and to another mailbox if I was in a special mailbox before, hence the folder-hook, happens without it as well though): | folder-hook . set record = =

Re: fcc-hook: how to set the current folder?

* Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-13 23:43 +0200]: > On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, David T-G wrote: > > Why bother to be folder-specific? Back to TFM and you'll find the > > abbreviation for "the current folder" can help: > > > > fcc-save-hook . ^ > > > Pardon my non-understanding, but searchin

Re: fcc-hook: how to set the current folder?

ate folder. What I meant is that I would like to configure a fcc-hook/fcc-save-hook the way that if I reply to a single user of a mailing list, the email gets saved into the appropriate folder. For example, assume I would have sent this email to you only. However, since the email was delivered to my

Re: fcc-hook: how to set the current folder?

On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 the mental interface of Lukas Ruf told: > Elimar, > > On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > > > This means you want "set record=+inbox" ? > > > > Maybe fcc-hook . "inbox" , but this is a contradiction

Re: fcc-hook: how to set the current folder?

David, On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, David T-G wrote: > > Why bother to be folder-specific? Back to TFM and you'll find the > abbreviation for "the current folder" can help: > > fcc-save-hook . ^ > Pardon my non-understanding, but searching the text version of the manual for "the current folder" as

Re: fcc-hook: how to set the current folder?

Elimar, On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > This means you want "set record=+inbox" ? > > Maybe fcc-hook . "inbox" , but this is a contradiction! > I do not have a folder named inbox. It does not really solve my problem. Thanks, anywa

Re: fcc-hook: how to set the current folder?

. When entering a % particular folder, I would like to set the fcc-hook such that every % outgoing email is saved in this folder. Why bother to be folder-specific? Back to TFM and you'll find the abbreviation for "the current folder" can help: fcc-save-hook . ^ Of course, you f

Re: fcc-hook: how to set the current folder?

nfigured according to well-known ,-) >email-addresses using the fcc-hook '~C pattern' 'folder_notation' >--> solved > > b) all the emails I do not have specifically configured fcc-hooks for, >I would like to store in the folder where I actually

fcc-hook: how to set the current folder?

Dear all, I would like to configure mutt 1.4 for outgoing emails such that every outgoing email is saved in an folder according to one of the following two methods: a) some particular folders are configured according to well-known ,-) email-addresses using the fcc-hook '~C pa

Re: Complex fcc-hook?

On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:09:59AM -0700, Ryan Sorensen wrote: > For an odd reason, fcc-save-hook seems to be order dependent.. The > default hook'll override the specific one there. folder-hook doesn't > seem to do the same thing. It took me a few minutes to try changing the > order to the one t

Re: Complex fcc-hook?

msg.pgp Description: PGP message

Re: Complex fcc-hook?

Ryan -- Gee, it must be fcc-hook day on the list... ...and then Ryan Sorensen said... % % I have procmail and mutt set up so mails for lists are automatically put % in =lists/listname, and mutt recognizes every subdirectory name in that % directory as a list. Not bad. % % listname is the

Complex fcc-hook?

I have procmail and mutt set up so mails for lists are automatically put in =lists/listname, and mutt recognizes every subdirectory name in that directory as a list. listname is the part before the @, like mutt-users for this one. Default save for other things, people, mainly, is in =people/nam

No record of mails (on fcc-hook) when mailbox is not valid

Hi, there! When specifying the fcc-hook: fcc-hook 'foo' "+x/y/z" without having a folder x/y/, mutt displays an error message which I can't read, and then at once the "Mail sent.". I even can't read the 'message when increasing the $sleep_time.

Re: my_hdr and fcc-hook

Hi Cedric, * Cedric Duval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010727 01:09]: > * Thomas Huemmler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07/27/01 00:23]: > > I´ve got a problem with "my_hdr From:" and "fcc-hook". If "my_hdr From:" > > is set, Mutt doesn´t produce a Fcc-Lin

Re: my_hdr and fcc-hook

* Thomas Huemmler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07/27/01 00:23]: > I´ve got a problem with "my_hdr From:" and "fcc-hook". If "my_hdr From:" > is set, Mutt doesn´t produce a Fcc-Line. Is this a bug? Looks like no fcc-hook is matching your mail. What are your

my_hdr and fcc-hook

Hi mutt users, I´ve got a problem with "my_hdr From:" and "fcc-hook". If "my_hdr From:" is set, Mutt doesn´t produce a Fcc-Line. Is this a bug? I´ve consulted google and the mutt-user-archive on mutt.org, but didn´t find an answer. I am using "Mutt 1.2.5i

Re: regexps in fcc-hook, save-hook

On 2001-06-26 at 16:59:35, Zane Crawford warbled: > What I'm trying to do, is make it such that by default, if no other rule > defines how something will be saved, that it offers USER (from > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) as the folder name. Thanks! But this is the default behaviour anyway, isn't it? Back

Re: fcc-hook update after To: change

On 2000.08.24, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David T-G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, while that might be convenient, I can also see how that would cause > problems. If you specifically set the fcc and then mutt notices that it Yep. > Probably :-) My bet is that it would only be a b

Re: fcc-hook update after To: change

t Fcc: folder according to the fcc-hook entry. Yep. % When the To: entry is changed after this, the Fcc: should be updated. Well, while that might be convenient, I can also see how that would cause problems. If you specifically set the fcc and then mutt notices that it doesn't match the To:

fcc-hook update after To: change

Hi there, I encountered a missing feature (or a bug?). When creating a new mail and exiting the editor, mutt fills in the correct Fcc: folder according to the fcc-hook entry. When the To: entry is changed after this, the Fcc: should be updated. Can this be implemented? Cu, Daniel

fcc-hook update after To: change

Hi there, I encountered a missing feature (or a bug?). When creating a new mail and exiting the editor, mutt fills in the correct Fcc: folder according to the fcc-hook entry. When the To: entry is changed after this, the Fcc: should be updated. Can this be implemented? Cu, Daniel

Re: order of save-hook,fcc-hook,fcc-save-hook,etc matters?

Brian Kimball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 15 Feb 2000: > Now I'm experimenting with fcc-save-hook, save-hook, and fcc-hook, and > I'm finding that my default setting (fcc-save-hook . "...") has to be > placed after all my other fcc-hooks and save-hook

order of save-hook,fcc-hook,fcc-save-hook,etc matters?

I've never had to worry about the order of my folder-hooks. They seem to work regardless of where and in what order I put them in my .muttrc. Now I'm experimenting with fcc-save-hook, save-hook, and fcc-hook, and I'm finding that my default setting (fcc-save-hook . "..."

Re: saving mails -> savename + fcc-hook

* Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000120 17:16]: > .. everytime I send a msg, Mutt wants to create a mailbox for it. I suppose you have "savename" set, ie mails to "user@domain" are saved in folder "=user". You might want to unset this or define a fcc

Re: prompt for Fcc -> default fcc-hook

* Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000120 14:15]: > How may I set mutt to prompt for an Fcc in the case > that there is no Fcc hook or rule already? There is no such prompt for Fcc. Workaround: Set a default fcc-hook. Sven

Re: my_hdr From: && fcc-hook

all my fcc-save-hook and fcc-hook directives do not have any % effect: by default all messages are proposed to be saved in Hmmm... That's curious... % =sent. I have played around with different configuration commands % send-hook - no effect too. Well, to turn off the =sent setting, try se

my_hdr From: && fcc-hook

Hello guys, The problem: I've corrected mutt configuration adding next string in it (to represent my current configuration): my_hdr From: Alexander Sclearuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Now all my fcc-save-hook and fcc-hook directives do not have any effect: by default all messages are pro

fcc-hook bug?

Perhaps I am not understanding something... -- .muttrc -- fcc-hook ericsson\.se =ericsson -- .muttrc -- If I send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], no fcc: gets set. What am I doing wrong? g. -- Grant Beattie Network & Unix Consultant work: [EMAIL PROTE