* Patrik Wallstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-19 10:38]:
> I just received a file split up into 87 emails.
> Is there any way for mutt to decode those mails,
> all of which are of the MIME type message/partial?
mutt is not a partial file decoder.
tag them all, then use tag-pref
begin Patrik Wallstrom quotation:
>
> > Pat, I couldn't find your key... Is it known to be on a particular
> > server?
>
> I know it is on http://www.keyserver.net/ and another server (forgot
> which).
Your key is on the common keyservers. (BTW, keyserver.net has evidently
collapsed down to
James --
...and then James Sneeringer said...
%
% On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 08:24:27AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
...
% | Now to see if I can figure out how to change it away from /tmp, which is
% | small here...
%
% If it's the same "showpartial" I have on my system (from the metamail
% package), i
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 08:24:27AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
| ...and then Patrik Wallstrom said...
| % I don't know how showpartial works, but it did. I hope I will never
| % receive message/partial again. :)
|
| Now to see if I can figure out how to change it away from /tmp, which is
|
Hi,
* Patrik Wallstrom [04/19/02 15:07:32 CEST] wrote:
> I don't know how showpartial works, but it did. I hope I will never
> receive message/partial again. :)
Well, I can image a reason to use message/partial. Some
mailversers do have limits set how large a single mail may be.
By s
> % I don't know how showpartial works, but it did. I hope I will never
% > % receive message/partial again. :)
...
% > Now to see if I can figure out how to change it away from /tmp, which is
% > small here...
%
% If you have more time on your hands, you could figure out how to sen
> % I don't know how showpartial works, but it did. I hope I will never
> % receive message/partial again. :)
>
> Yeah :-)
>
> I checked the man page and it's actually quite simple; yay.
>
> Now to see if I can figure out how to change it away from /tmp, which is
&
hat Outlook Express can send those ugly things.
Heh. One more thing that hurts :-)
%
% > % mutt to decode those mails, all of which are of the MIME type
% > % message/partial?
% >
% > What happens if tag them and then feed them to munpack?
%
% Actually, I managed to solve it. Thi
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, David T-G wrote:
> % I just received a file split up into 87 emails. Is there any way for
> Ouch!
Yes, it seems that Outlook Express can send those ugly things.
> % mutt to decode those mails, all of which are of the MIME type
> % message/partial?
>
> W
Patrik --
...and then Patrik Wallstrom said...
%
% I just received a file split up into 87 emails. Is there any way for
Ouch!
% mutt to decode those mails, all of which are of the MIME type
% message/partial?
What happens if tag them and then feed them to munpack
I just received a file split up into 87 emails. Is there any way for
mutt to decode those mails, all of which are of the MIME type
message/partial?
--
patrik_wallstrom->foodfight->[EMAIL PROTECTED]>+46-709580442
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 06:14:53AM -0400, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> I received an attachment today, kindly split (by Outlook? or a
> friendly MTA?) into 18 separate pieces.
By Outlook. No sensible MTA would do this.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]innominate AG
Technical Consulta
I received an attachment today, kindly split (by Outlook? or a
friendly MTA?) into 18 separate pieces.
Yes, I can emacs them all together, cutting out intervening headers,
rearranging the order, etc. But I'd very much like to find a better
way. Google has not helped except to say this has come up
GASP is a preprocessor for assembly programs and is a part of binutils package.
Raju
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 11:36:40AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 12:31:00PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
>
> > > I hadn't seen "gasp" before -- and it's not in my
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 12:31:00PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > I hadn't seen "gasp" before -- and it's not in my system man pages to
> > learn about. I'd always seen that step as "fsck" and "more" :-)
>
> It's GNU Assembler if I remember right... I've actually heard of one
GNU Assembler
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 12 Mar 2000:
> I dunno from message/partial, but did you try piping all of the segments
> thru good old munpack?
Getting punpack (which I didn't have installed on my workstation),
tagging all the parts, setting pipe-split, and pipi
Mikko --
...and then Mikko Hänninen said...
% Hi,
%
% Awhile ago I asked about Mutt support for message/partial. The answer
% was that "not yet, maybe someone will write it some day".
*grin*
%
% So, does anyone know any program which can automatically assemble these
% parts? I j
Hi,
Awhile ago I asked about Mutt support for message/partial. The answer
was that "not yet, maybe someone will write it some day".
So, does anyone know any program which can automatically assemble these
parts? I just got an email which has been split into 73 parts, so the
"vi
Byrial Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I will suggest that you copy the 5 parts in sequence to a new mbox
> folder, and then reassemble the original message in an editor by
> deleting the overhead from splitting it in parts:
This is a cumbersome method, and while it works, if you end up doi
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 00:41:12 +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Hello all Mutt gurus,
>
> Just recently I got a message where the content had apparently been
> split into 5 separate parts (messages).
>
> The headers reveal:
>
> Content-Type: message/partial; [...]
Hello all Mutt gurus,
Just recently I got a message where the content had apparently been
split into 5 separate parts (messages).
The headers reveal:
Mime-Version: 1.0 (split by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: message/partial; id="Thu_Feb_10_00:24:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
number=1; total=
21 matches
Mail list logo
