On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:27:23AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2012-06-22, Luis Mochan wrote:
> > > But that would defeat the purpose of the copy which is to have a
> > > stable file for LibreOffice to read while allowing mutt to wipe and
> > > delete its temporary file. A hard link would work
On 2012-06-22, David Champion wrote:
> * On 22 Jun 2012, Gary Johnson wrote:
> >
> > But that would defeat the purpose of the copy which is to have a
> > stable file for LibreOffice to read while allowing mutt to wipe and
> > delete its temporary file. A hard link would work if it wasn't that
>
* On 22 Jun 2012, Gary Johnson wrote:
>
> But that would defeat the purpose of the copy which is to have a
> stable file for LibreOffice to read while allowing mutt to wipe and
> delete its temporary file. A hard link would work if it wasn't that
> mutt wipes the file before unlinking it.
The l
On 2012-06-22, Luis Mochan wrote:
> > But that would defeat the purpose of the copy which is to have a
> > stable file for LibreOffice to read while allowing mutt to wipe and
> > delete its temporary file. A hard link would work if it wasn't that
> > mutt wipes the file before unlinking it.
> >
>
> But that would defeat the purpose of the copy which is to have a
> stable file for LibreOffice to read while allowing mutt to wipe and
> delete its temporary file. A hard link would work if it wasn't that
> mutt wipes the file before unlinking it.
>
I guess not. If I understand correctly, the
David,
Thanks for the suggestion!
Luis
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:50:02PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> * On 22 Jun 2012, Luis Mochan wrote:
> > I guess a solution used for browsing html attachments (discussed
> > here some time ago; see attached perl script) may be adapted for
> > running libr
On 2012-06-22, David Champion wrote:
> * On 22 Jun 2012, Luis Mochan wrote:
> > I guess a solution used for browsing html attachments (discussed
> > here some time ago; see attached perl script) may be adapted for
> > running libreoffice. The main idea would be to make a copy of the
> > file, send
* On 22 Jun 2012, Luis Mochan wrote:
> I guess a solution used for browsing html attachments (discussed
> here some time ago; see attached perl script) may be adapted for
> running libreoffice. The main idea would be to make a copy of the
> file, send it to libreoffice and sleep a short time befor
Thanks Chris! You're right (it was a fast translation from Spanish).
Regards,
Luis
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 04:57:04AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:38:10AM -0500, Luis Mochan wrote:
> > # DESCRIPTION
> > # Runs a browser on a copy of a file, and sleeps for a while
>
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:38:10AM -0500, Luis Mochan wrote:
> # DESCRIPTION
> # Runs a browser on a copy of a file, and sleeps for a while
> # before deleting it. It solves the problem that mutt may delete
> # the file too fast.
IMHO, change "fast" to "soon". The *speed* of delet
I guess a solution used for browsing html attachments (discussed
here some time ago; see attached perl script) may be adapted for
running libreoffice. The main idea would be to make a copy of the
file, send it to libreoffice and sleep a short time before returning
to mutt,
Regards,
Luis
On Fri, J
Hi
2012/6/22 steve :
> Have you found a solution?
Unfortunately, no!
--
Marcelo Luiz de Laia
Hi,
Le 26-04-2012, à 08:07:42 -0300, Marcelo Luiz de Laia (marcelol...@gmail.com) a
écrit :
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
>
> > It seems like most of your entries are bound to openoffice(soffice) instead
> > of libreoffice. Try to change all entries to libreoffice instead.
> >
On 26.04.12,08:07, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
>
> > It seems like most of your entries are bound to openoffice(soffice) instead
> > of libreoffice. Try to change all entries to libreoffice instead.
> >
> > Jostein
> >
>
> Thank you very much, but,
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
> It seems like most of your entries are bound to openoffice(soffice) instead
> of libreoffice. Try to change all entries to libreoffice instead.
>
> Jostein
>
Thank you very much, but, it dosen't solve that problem.
If libreoffice is alread running
On 26.04.12,06:17, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
>
> > On 25.04.12,18:12, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote:
> > > On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, David Haguenauer wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Sometime I got the same problem here. However, I see that I only get
> > > > > this
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
> On 25.04.12,18:12, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, David Haguenauer wrote:
> >
> > > > Sometime I got the same problem here. However, I see that I only get
> > > > this issue when libreoffice is already running!
> > >
> > > I be
On 25.04.12,18:12, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, David Haguenauer wrote:
>
> > > Sometime I got the same problem here. However, I see that I only get
> > > this issue when libreoffice is already running!
> >
> > I believe this is a different issue. What probably happens in yo
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, David Haguenauer wrote:
> > Sometime I got the same problem here. However, I see that I only get
> > this issue when libreoffice is already running!
>
> I believe this is a different issue. What probably happens in your
> in your case ...
> ... if LibreOffice is already runn
19 matches
Mail list logo
