Re: shell return on macro?

1999-09-09 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > (Actually, I don't remember seeing "!" documented as an actual call in the > manual, I've just seen it used for urlview and such...that also is not > cross-referenced under "shell" at all. :) It's just the default binding for 'shell-escape'. -- Jeremy Blo

Re: shell return on macro?

1999-09-09 Thread Fairlight
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 12:10:36AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser blurted: > Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > I've got a question about whether something is at all configurable without > > hacking the source, either by option or part of the expression. Take: > > > > macro index g "!fetchmail\n" '

Re: shell return on macro?

1999-09-09 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > I've got a question about whether something is at all configurable without > hacking the source, either by option or part of the expression. Take: > > macro index g "!fetchmail\n" 'start/awaken fetchmail' > > This executes perfectly...except for the annoyi

shell return on macro?

1999-09-09 Thread Fairlight
I've got a question about whether something is at all configurable without hacking the source, either by option or part of the expression. Take: macro index g "!fetchmail\n" 'start/awaken fetchmail' This executes perfectly...except for the annoying "press return to continue" after it's done. I