On Tue, Apr 23, 2002, Alain Bench wrote:
Hello Sven,
On Sunday, April 21, 2002 at 5:37:05 AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
telnet.exe sucks. use putty.exe. nuff said.
Thanks for the advice, Sven! It solved a half of my problem: I now
get nice charset and nice thread tree. You're
Am 24.04.2002 um 04:34:38 -0400 schrieb Ken Weingold folgendes:
If you like putty and want a REALLY nice ssh client, check out
SecureCRT from VanDyke. www.vandyke.com . For Windows I really
couldn't ask for more, and VanDyke is a perfect example of how a
company should be run.
What about
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Am 24.04.2002 um 04:34:38 -0400 schrieb Ken Weingold folgendes:
If you like putty and want a REALLY nice ssh client, check out
SecureCRT from VanDyke. www.vandyke.com . For Windows I really
couldn't ask for more, and VanDyke is a perfect
Ken Weingold wrote:
You get what you pay for. Putty sucks ass compared to SecureCRT.
Putty vs. SecureCRT in functionality is like vi vs. vim, csh vs. tcsh,
sh vs. bash, etc. Both will do the job, but
well sh and vi are sometimes better for a task than their improved
counterparts (let's
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
If you like putty and want a REALLY nice ssh client, check out
SecureCRT from VanDyke. www.vandyke.com . For Windows I really
couldn't ask for more, and VanDyke is a perfect example of how a
company should be run.
I tested it a few months ago (to
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
perhaps you could explain what functionality is missing in Putty that
SecureCRT has? for certain functions, SecureCRT is a lot better, but for
many users, Putty is easier to use and provides the desired
SecureCRT is just a lot more robust in pretty
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:39:31PM -0400, Ken Weingold wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
perhaps you could explain what functionality is missing in Putty that
SecureCRT has? for certain functions, SecureCRT is a lot better, but for
many users, Putty is easier to use and
Hello Sven,
On Sunday, April 21, 2002 at 5:37:05 AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
telnet.exe sucks. use putty.exe. nuff said.
Thanks for the advice, Sven! It solved a half of my problem: I now
get nice charset and nice thread tree. You're right, Putty seems to be
5 steps ahead compared to
Alain --
...and then Alain Bench said...
%
% Hello Sven,
%
% On Sunday, April 21, 2002 at 5:37:05 AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
%
% telnet.exe sucks. use putty.exe. nuff said.
%
% Thanks for the advice, Sven! It solved a half of my problem: I now
That's good to hear!
% get nice
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, David T-G wrote:
I wanted to ask about this before but forgot... Are you sure it's
cygwin's and not Win's? Where is telnet if you do a which?
cygwin dll implements a terminal emulator inside M$'s console window.
(running bash in the window makes the terminal emulator
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 05:37:05AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
* Alain Bench [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-14 21:57]:
I use mutt in 3 ways:
...
- running remotely on a Linux box, Mutt started from Cygwin thru it's
own /bin/telnet.exe (again in a Bash session inside a cmd.exe window).
Same
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 09:45:29PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
Alas! Sven Guckes spake thus:
telnet.exe sucks. use putty.exe. nuff said.
I disagree. /usr/bin/ssh beats both of them ;)
ssh (usually) doesn't do terminal emulation.
--
Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Alain Bench [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-14 21:57]:
I use mutt in 3 ways:
...
- running remotely on a Linux box, Mutt started from Cygwin thru it's
own /bin/telnet.exe (again in a Bash session inside a cmd.exe window).
Same thing: Nice charset, bad trees. Note I had to copy Cygwin's
--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alas! Sven Guckes spake thus:
telnet.exe sucks. use putty.exe. nuff said.
I disagree. /usr/bin/ssh beats both of them ;)
--=20
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL
Hello Luke,
On Friday, April 12, 2002 at 3:39:03 PM +0100, Luke Ross wrote:
[graphic versus ascii thread tree]
If under cygwin, force mutt to run under code page 437
Could you please elaborate this one? I was never able to get Latin-1
characters *and* graphic tree at the same time
I'm using Mutt 1.3.28i, and my thread tree display looks messed up:
1117 L Jan 16 Nick Wilson (0.6K) Hook?
1118 sL Jan 16 René Clerc (1.3K) mq
1119 L Jan 16 Nicolas Rachinsky(0.3K) tq
1120 L Jan 16 Philip Wittamore (0.5K) x tq
1121 sL Jan 16 Benjamin Smith
Doh! The solution was to set ascii_chars=yes. That was it. Just
goes to show, no matter how long I look for an answer, I'm bound to
find it the minute after sending my query to a mailing list. :)
Apologies to all.
--
Katie Bechtold
http://www.katie-and-rob.org/katie/
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:27:02AM -0400, Katie Bechtold wrote:
I'm using Mutt 1.3.28i, and my thread tree display looks messed up:
1117 L Jan 16 Nick Wilson (0.6K) Hook?
1118 sL Jan 16 René Clerc (1.3K) mq
1119 L Jan 16 Nicolas Rachinsky(0.3K) tq
1120
Alas! Katie Bechtold spake thus:
Just
goes to show, no matter how long I look for an answer, I'm bound to
find it the minute after sending my query to a mailing list. :)
You too??!
Lol, I do that all the time ;)
Apologies to all.
Don't sweat it.
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
19 matches
Mail list logo
