I'd like to be able to drag and drop an outlook email to a different tab
that than the current one. When you drag and drop the message to a
different tab the target tab should become active and allow you to drop a
task to the view on that tab.
--
You received this message because you are subs
(Version: 4.0.0.2034)
*Problem*
Tab loses title when pinned
*Steps to recreate*
1. Create a new tab
2. Right click on the tab and choose 'Pin this tab'
*Workaround*
don't pin the tab. :(
*Expected behaviour*
The title should not disappear and there should be an option to custom
format t
e talked quite a bit about locking a workspace to a
> view. I think locking the workspace to zoom level at the same time would be
> a good improvement to that proposal. Unfortunately I don't think it's going
> to happen anytime right away...
>
> On Feb 11, 2013 7:38 AM, &qu
Goal: to be able to have a tab for each of my major projects and be able to
freeze the view/filter so that each workspace never changes. Currently I
use the zoom in feature to get to a particular folder/project but it looks
to be quite easy to mess this up.
The way I look at it is that I can s
> tasks. (which I often add through Outlook add-ins so not always able
> to flag/date/categorize).
Lisa, can you elaborate on what you mean by Outlook add-ins? Do you
have an add-in that works with MLO?
thx
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MyLifeO
This is great info folks. Thanks for responding. I'll give flags a
shot and see where it takes me.
Cheers!
On Sep 17, 6:17 am, pottster wrote:
> This is true but in To-Do view if you insert a task it will inherit
> the flag (and the parent folder) of the task above.
>
> On Sep 16, 9:34 pm, "Ri
Here's the problem - I have maybe 3 dozen active tasks but some days I
want to come in and just see the 5 or so I need to do that day.
Everything else is pretty important but sometimes I need to focus on a
few items and I get lost seeing a page of tasks.
I tried creating a node with today's date a
I have a context called @delegated.
On Jan 19, 12:17 pm, Michael Hopkins
wrote:
> If someone is doing one sub-task in my project, it's "David - write
> the introduction." If they are doing the whole project, it's "David -
> write ABC user manual." If I need to talk about it with them, they
> ge
Same here! Thanks to you both.
On Jan 9, 4:59 pm, Lisa Stroyan wrote:
> At 10:40 AM 1/9/2010, you wrote:
>
> >Getting stuck doesn't make you an exception, it makes you human! When
> >you state that you "try" to follow GTD as well, I suspect that you
> >should perhaps look closely at the Weekly R
re in the future. Can I assume that
people us the Urgency field to "push" tasks to the top of the list if
they don't sort items by due date?
On Jan 7, 2:24 pm, canadug wrote:
> Can some give me an idea of the difference between, for example,
> setting a task's goal as
> Setting a task as a Weekly Goal is not the same as expecting it to be
> completed sometime in the current week. There is no direct correlation
> between dates and goals. I do not date my tasks unless they truly are
> due on a specific date, so most of my Weekly Goals do not have dates.
> Converse
Can some give me an idea of the difference between, for example,
setting a task's goal as "week" and just setting the due date to be
the Friday? When I set the goal, the task floats to the top of my
ToDo list. I don't know why it does that and I'm not sure I like that
actually.
In other words, i
12 matches
Mail list logo
