Hi
first check this thought application end
or
There is another way
slave-skip-errors=1062 ---> in my.cnf and restart mysql
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 30.11.2012 23:52, schrieb Rick James:
> > Possible causes:
> > * Someone is writing to the Slave
>
2012/12/04 15:18 -0800, Karen Abgarian
MySQL, like all other products, can be peachy or bitchy. Good ones, they also
die.Wish I was kidding :-)
Mind VHS & BetaMax? BetaMax had much better color--but VHS long outlasted it.
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives
HI
share detail
Slave_IO_Running: Yes/No
Slave_SQL_Running: Yes/No
Last_IO_Errno: 0
Last_IO_Error:
Last_SQL_Errno: 0
Last_SQL_Error:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Rick James wrote:
> SHOW SLAVE STATUS\G
> SHOW MASTER STATUS;
> What directory are the bi
Hi,
I'm running this query:
mysql> SELECT email FROM promoters where id NOT IN (SELECT promoter_id
FROM credits WHERE success = 1 ) and active = 1;
Empty set (31.89 sec)
its returning an empty set and take over 30 seconds to return.
mysql> describe promoters;
+---+--
Hi,
A subquery with IN clause is not a good idea. If you want to tune this
query, try adding indexes on the tables accessed in the inner query
"credits". A composite index on (success,promoter_id) would be sufficient,
then the optimizer will use this index for the where clause and as a
covering in
MySQL, like all other products, can be peachy or bitchy. Good ones, they also
die.Wish I was kidding :-)
On Dec 4, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Andrés Tello wrote:
> Are u kidding?
>
> Mysql is dead easy and damn good... obviously it has its perks, but any
> database engine has them... (I'm loo
Are u kidding?
Mysql is dead easy and damn good... obviously it has its perks, but any
database engine has them... (I'm looking at you DB2)...
There has been a lot of improvements lately, I "feel" that mysql is moving
much more faster under oracle umbrella than when it was alone...
Replication..
Lol! Good point Karen!
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Karen Abgarian wrote:
> A touch of realism: we are all dying. For some, it may take a while,
> hopefully.
>
> On 04.12.2012, at 9:53, Tim Pownall wrote:
>
> > Mysql is used by just about every web host and is one of the most common
> > da
Oracle is investing a lot into improvements in MySQL and releasing most of it
in the Community version.
Meanwhile, MariaDB is a serious contender. It is a drop-in replacement for
MySQL. And Percona's Xtradb (included in MariaDB) is a drop-in replacement for
InnoDB. If Oracle did something
I have heard that due to Oracle taking over, the OS community is
shifting to other type of DB's .
Any thoughts?
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
A touch of realism: we are all dying. For some, it may take a while,
hopefully.
On 04.12.2012, at 9:53, Tim Pownall wrote:
> Mysql is used by just about every web host and is one of the most common
> database servers around the world. I do not have any intent to stop using
> mysql unless the
Mysql is used by just about every web host and is one of the most common
database servers around the world. I do not have any intent to stop using
mysql unless they start charging for it which I do not think will happen.
Thanks,
Tim Pownall
Sr. Linux Systems Monitoring
Hostgator.com LLC
On Tue,
12 matches
Mail list logo