.
Regards,
Devananda
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
. If that's not what happened
in your case, I apologize for the long-winded email. You'll have to
provide more details about what error messages were reported, and your
system configuration, for people to help more.
HTH,
Devananda
Mark Steele wrote:
Dan: The options I specified are correct
happened?
Regards,
Devananda
Mark Steele wrote:
Dan: The options I specified are correct (according to the
documentation) to get a consistent non-blocking snapshot.
(--single-transaction disables --lock-tables, --opt is the default
behavior for mysqldump).
My question was more in the nature
,
Devananda
David Israelsson wrote:
I have a really simple (two tables, one relation) but big (~70 GB)
innodb database containing rather dynamic data. After deleting lots
of records from the tables, the innodb data files still take the same
amount of disk space as before. What is the correct way
inadvertently caused.
Best regards,
Devananda
Actually, what was missing all along was pab.login_id=1 in the ON
clause, not the WHERE clause!!! I guess I've not used that sort of
condition in a JOIN before... If I rewrite your query like this, which
is much simpler, it does
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Devananda,
I have to support Peter on this one. What he submitted to you is a
perfectly appropriate solution. It seems as though you rejected his
assistance before even trying to see if it would work.
On the contrary, I have tried his suggestions and they do
|
++-++---+---+---+-+-+-+---+
4 rows in set (0.01 sec)
Thanks in advance,
--
Devananda vdv
http://devananda
(), interval 1 hour) |
+--+
| 2006-01-19 13:47:53 |
+--+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
Cheers :)
--
Devananda vdv
http://devananda-vdv.blogspot.com/
http://mycat.sourceforge.net/
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list
integrity would be lost.
In short, any time you are running circular replication, you have to
ensure that updates are processed in the same order on all servers, or
know that the order is irrelevant to your data integrity.
Regards,
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives
, this option will Lock all tables across all databases.
However, there is a note that may be of interest to you, since you are
using 4.1.8
--first-slave, -x
Deprecated, renamed to --lock-all-tables in MySQL 4.1.8.
Regards,
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http
are already importing
your data in chunks, try making each chunk a separate transaction, or
waiting until disk activity slows to load the next chunk. Also, there
have been major improvements to InnoDB in the later 4.1 releases, so if
possible, I would suggest upgrading.
Hope that helps!
Devananda
innodb_additional_mem_pool_size = 128M
innodb_buffer_pool_size = 1G
innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 0
innodb_lock_wait_timeout = 30
Is anything wrong with this? The server had been running fine for months
with these settings
Regards,
Heikki
Thanks for all your time!
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL
Heikki Tuuri wrote:
Deva,
please post the complete output except the transaction data.
Regards,
Heikki
Please let me know if there is any additional data I can provide to help
resolve this.
=
051005 7:18:17 INNODB MONITOR OUTPUT
thread id 3, query id 5280 192.168.1.38 webserver update
INSERT INTO emails_history_30_17(email_id, mailing_id, action_type,
xtime) VALUES (
- Original Message - From: Devananda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: mailing.database.myodbc
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 10:14 AM
Subject: Re
EXTENDED, that came back saying everything was fine.
While I was writing this email, the server has crashed two more times in
this same way.
Any help would be appreciated!
Thanks in advance,
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
Devananda wrote:
One of our servers which is configured primarily for InnoDB has crashed
in the same fashion three times in the past 48 hours. I've been going
over the error log, and I would like to know if anyone else has seen
similar errors, or can give me some pointers to work out
Table_locks_waited 306450
Hope that helps!
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or deny new
connections.
You need to adjust something in the formula - reduce max_connections if
that is possible, or reduce the key_buffer_size if you do not need to be
working with MyISAM tables on this server, or allocate less memory to
innodb_buffer_pool_size.
Best Regards,
Devananda
allowing you to
allocate plenty of RAM to the innodb_buffer_pool).
Of course, you can do both (just to play it safe, right?). ;)
Best Regards,
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL
with a lot more clarity than I would have, so I'll
just agree with what he wrote and stop here :)
Regards,
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/replication-features.html (towards the
bottom it talks about replication of transactions and MyISAM engine)
Best Regards,
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeff wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Devananda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 16:14
To: Jeff
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: MyISAM to InnoDB
Jeff wrote:
True, is there a way to tell a slave to not replicate
certain queries
like alter table
on.
Regards,
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
be issued to help folks recognize when this is happening
and encourage the clear use of parentheses.
Just my $0.02
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
servers have BOTH log-bin and log-slave-updates.
With just 2 servers (A-B-A), you need log-bin, but do not need
log-slave-updates.
Regards,
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
logging enabled, and needs to have the other server as
it's master.
Regards,
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeff wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff McKeon
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 13:19
To: Devananda
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: RE: Circular Replication
-Original Message-
From: Devananda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 11:55
To: Jeff
Cc
,
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Dell Desktop| atpc01 |
| 1003 | Acer Laptop | atpc02 |
| 1004 | Apple iBook | NULL |
+---+-++
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Regards,
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http
old DBMS into MySQL, and continue to
use it as such, without problem. Have you tried this in a test
environment yet?
Perhaps I have completely misunderstood what you are trying to do. If
that's the case, I apologize for the long winded and useless answer!
Best Regards,
Devananda vdv
a binary log so
you can replicate those updates back to the master.
Best regards,
Devananda vdv
Thanks, Devananda!
I really should have looked at the manual once again.
I'm not sure what you meant by the last sentence - all the updates are
done on the master, and they are naturally replicated
to the master.
Best regards,
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Best regards,
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/char.html
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/charset-unicode.html
HTH,
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Justin Palmer wrote:
Hi List,
I have the following query where I am trying to locate a single students
record. I only know that the students record has an id of 3690 and an
employer_id of 3 possibles. So I thought that OR would work great. The
problem is that it returns all students with
Brian Dunning wrote:
In one case I do need to jump back and forth between databases that are
on different physical servers. What's the most efficient way to handle
this?
On Aug 2, 2005, at 11:14 AM, Devananda wrote:
Brian Dunning wrote:
My RaQ4 is throwing the Too many connections error
set the wait_timeout value in your my.cnf to something
shorter, but this would affect all your applications and does not
address the source of your problem.
Regards,
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http
, stopping if a range is encountered.
Thanks again,
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
about the servers themselves (CPU, RAM, etc)? Seeing the configuration
parameters would help us to understand where your problem may be coming
from.
Regards,
Devananda vdv
Catalin Trifu wrote:
Hi,
I have the following table :
CREATE TABLE `raw_outgoing_sms` (
`id` bigint
statement. Taking 10 hours to alter a very large table
is not unheard of, though it really depends on your table structure.
Regards,
Devananda vdv
Christos Andronis wrote:
Hi all,
we are trying to run the following query on a table that contains over 600 million rows:
'ALTER TABLE
, etc.
Regards,
Devananda vdv
Chris Kantarjiev wrote:
I'm looking at the stats on one of our servers and trying to understand
why Handler_read_rnd_next is so high. It's 256.5M right now, which is
about 10x the total number of reported queries.
The machine is being used, almost entirely
, this could cause serious
problems to your application if it relies on making any writes to the
database while you are dumping it. Thus, I would suggest using InnoDB as
much as possible.
-Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe
!
Devananda vdv
Chris Knipe wrote:
Hi all,
The moral of the story, is don't run out of disk space, but it's a bit to
late for that now.
A quick scenario One master server, two backups replicating from the
master. Our data and bin logs are on two different partitions, and the
partition holding
, then you would benefit from distributing the read load to
multiple slave servers.)
Regards,
Devananda vdv
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
of room. (See
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=122241 for an explanation.)
~ Devananda
bruce wrote:
hi...
i'm considering an app where i'm going to parse a lot of colleges (~1000)
faculty information. would it be better to have all the faculty information
in one large table
with the option
innodb_autoextend_increment, in megabytes. The default value is 8.
Regards,
Devananda
Kasthuri Ilankamban wrote:
Thank a lot for your quick reply. SInce we are not using myisam tables
( except for the system tables), I deallocated memory from myisam and
allocated to innodb. When
If you can, I recommend installing mytop
(http://jeremy.zawodny.com/mysql/mytop/) - it has helped me immensely to
identify which particular queries are putting the heaviest load on the
server.
I have a lot of two column tables consisting
of integer primary key and varchar in the second
While the query WHERE expr LIKE '%$user%' works without fail, it can
not use an index, and thus on large tables will be exceedingly slow.
mysql explain select last, first from users where concat(last,first)
like '%user%'\G
*** 1. row ***
991879310
768.08 inserts/s, 5.00 updates/s, 0.00 deletes/s, 21583.28 reads/s
END OF INNODB MONITOR OUTPUT
--
Devananda van der Veen
Systems Developer
http://hydragroup.com
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http
Hi all,
Does anyone know of a graphical monitor for innodb status? Something
like RRD, or that integrates with RRD? I'm looking to set up status
monitoring for a group of 20 servers, and this would be a very big help
in diagnosing problems.
Thanks for your time,
Devananda van der Veen
Neopets
are
currently running with innodb_thread_concurrency=16. Each DB has 200-400
active php clients, and there appears to be quite a large backup within
innodb, based on this. Any suggestions? Or experience with setting this
option to 500?
Thanks :)
Devananda
Neopets, Inc
--
MySQL General Mailing List
into
similar problems?
Thanks for you time,
Devananda
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
52 matches
Mail list logo