4.0 - 4.1 undocumented incompatible change w/float?

2005-05-27 Thread Don MacAskill
I've already opened a support ticket with MySQL on this issue, but thought someone here might know the answer, too: Hi there, I'm trying to make sure I'm not doing something stupid. I'm trying to migrate from 4.0 to 4.1, but I'm hitting a snag. I can't find anything in the docs to

4.0 - 4.1 undocumented incompatible change w/float?

2005-05-27 Thread Don MacAskill
I've already opened a support ticket with MySQL on this issue, but thought someone here might know the answer, too: Hi there, I'm trying to make sure I'm not doing something stupid. I'm trying to migrate from 4.0 to 4.1, but I'm hitting a snag. I can't find anything in the docs to

InnoDB backup + replication problem?

2004-09-29 Thread Don MacAskill
I've got an interesting (well, I think so anyway) problem with my replication. The slave chugs along just fine, then spits out: Query caused different errors on master and slave. Error on master: 'Can't execute the query because you have a conflicting read lock' (1223), Error on slave: 'no

Aborted connection error (error reading comm packets) ?

2004-07-08 Thread Don MacAskill
I just switched from 4.0.18-max to 4.0.20-max on AMD64 and I'm getting tons of these in my error log: 040708 2:24:12 Aborted connection 65531 to db: 'db' user: 'user' host: `10.1.1.27' (Got an error reading communication packets) When I switch back to 4.0.18-max, they go away. These are the

BUG and workaround (Was: Table lock problem on INSERT with FULLTEXT index?)

2004-04-16 Thread Don MacAskill
This problem is completely repeatable, I'm not the only one having it, and I've found a (temporary) workaround. I'm not sure if it affects other machines than AMD64, but it certainly affects them. I've tested on two now. If you start MySQL with skip-concurrent-insert, the problem completely

Re: BUG and workaround (Was: Table lock problem on INSERT with FULLTEXT index?)

2004-04-16 Thread Don MacAskill
Success with the bug entry. Nice system, too. http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=3483 Thanks, Don Don MacAskill wrote: This problem is completely repeatable, I'm not the only one having it, and I've found a (temporary) workaround. I'm not sure if it affects other machines than AMD64

Re: Table lock problem on INSERT with FULLTEXT index?

2004-04-12 Thread Don MacAskill
pretty tiny. A mysqldump of the table is only 442K. Has no-one else seen anything like this? I can't imagine I'm the only one. Thanks, Don Don MacAskill wrote: Hi there, I've got a bizarre problem I can't seem to solve. I have a small MyISAM table (6533 rows) with a small FULLTEXT index

Table lock problem on INSERT with FULLTEXT index?

2004-04-07 Thread Don MacAskill
Hi there, I've got a bizarre problem I can't seem to solve. I have a small MyISAM table (6533 rows) with a small FULLTEXT index (3 columns per row, an average of 1 word per column). When I do an INSERT on the table, many times the thread gets stuck perpetually in Query | update. Future

Re: MySQL 4.0.16 64bit crash report

2003-12-12 Thread Don MacAskill
characters, I do not remember who made that bug report. Please test with 4.0.17 when it comes out. Thank you, Heikki - Alkuperäinen viesti - Lähettäjä: Don MacAskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vastaanottaja: Heikki Tuuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kopio: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lähetetty: Thursday, December 11, 2003

MySQL 4.0.16 64bit crash report

2003-12-10 Thread Don MacAskill
I'm running 4.0.16 on a dual-Opteron using the 64bit mysql-max binary distribution (tar.gz, not rpm) from mysql.com. I have 8GB of RAM, and it was using about 4.5GB at the time of the crash. 031210 9:24:34 InnoDB: Assertion failure in thread 1171265904 in file row0upd.c line 713 InnoDB:

Re: MySQL 4.0.16 64bit crash report

2003-12-10 Thread Don MacAskill
); i++) { data = rec_get_nth_field(rec, i, len); dfield = dtuple_get_nth_field(entry, i); ut_a(len == dfield_get_len(dfield)); - Original Message - From: Don MacAskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: mailing.database.myodbc Sent: Wednesday

Re: [Fwd: MySQL w/dual-master replication?]

2003-10-07 Thread Don MacAskill
Message- From: Don MacAskill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday 06 October 2003 20:47 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Fwd: MySQL w/dual-master replication?] Hey all, I sent this a few days ago, but it may have gotten lost in the weekend for many of you. Don't worry, I won't keep re

[Fwd: MySQL w/dual-master replication?]

2003-10-06 Thread Don MacAskill
Original Message Subject: MySQL w/dual-master replication? Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 11:07:43 -0700 From: Don MacAskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi there, I realize it's not supported, but nonetheless, I need to investigate how possible it is. The primary goal is high

MySQL w/dual-master replication?

2003-10-04 Thread Don MacAskill
the old master joins back up, I can let it be a slave for awhile to catch back up, then swap back, correct? Thanks in advance! Don MacAskill http://onethumb.smugmug.com/ -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com