On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Guilherme Orcutt wrote:
> Which one would be the best with MySQL thinking in reliability and
> performance?
> Thanks a lot for your thoughts!
InnoDB scales *MUCH* better than BerkeleyDB. While it did fine in our
benchmarks consisting of a small number of records, in some be
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, BD wrote:
> At 01:54 PM 4/5/2002, you wrote:
> >I have seen many people saying that InnoDB is a great deal, that InnoDB
> >rocks, etc. and I am concerced about how much better InnoDB is compared to
> >MyISAM tables. Can someone tells me wich one is better ? I know that InnoDB
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Aaron D. Turner wrote:
> I've read the docs on mysql.com about the BDB and InnoDB table formats, as
> well as their pro's & con's and I was wondering if anyone could give their
> opinion on the matter. I don't need row-level locking or other fancy
> features other than tran
